"Those Who Oppose Gay Rights Are Vilified"

yeah , that shit blew my mind, id check out some of the rest of his stuff.

but, that sketch, i just had to share here lol.
 
Steve French said:
I only used the word nigger here to illustrate how most "whiteys" wouldn't give a fuck about some nigger getting shot in the ghetto, and how it wouldn't make the front page because in their eyes thats how niggers are and it happens all the time. If I were really such a bigot, don't you think I would've said "faggot" instead of homosexual?
Click to expand...

OMG. It must be something in the water up there. If I were God I would change the sexual orientation of every single MAPLE LEAF player just to punish you for being such a fucking retard. I would even change their emblem to a rainbow colored maple leaf.
Then I would change their anthem to "The Dance of The Sugar Plum Fairies"
Did anyone ever tell you; "You really should never speak, ever."
 
BTW... I think you are a racist. A bigot. A homophobe. Anti American and a fucking hippocrite just for starters.
You speak without thinking. You preach but can't grasp the meaning of 'The Word'. You hide behind a book whose words you really don't understand but you're afraid to tell anyone because they will tell you what I have told you for free; you're retarded.
I hope your first son is gayer than Liberace. I hope you catch him with another man one day and that the guy on top is blacker than the ace of spades. Then after years of costly therapy I hope you come to the divinely inspired conclusion that your son is still your son. Love does not discriminate. Maybe then will you be able to post in this thread and have something of value to contribute.
Until then put the mouse down. Step away from the computer and read that book....
 
What if a Christian/Catholic person with strong religious beliefs works in a marraige registry office and are now forced by law to marry homosexual people regardless of the fact they believe it is wrong...whos rights take precendent there? Just recently in Ireland it became against the law for the registry office worker to refuse to marry homosexuals because it was a denial of their (now equal) human rights...but now its denying the rights to free religious belief of the office worker.

Just wondering from an outside view like, I dont give a shit what people do as long as they dont hurt other people and have respect for me and my beliefs.
 
Harrekin said:
What if a Christian/Catholic person with strong religious beliefs works in a marraige registry office and are now forced by law to marry homosexual people regardless of the fact they believe it is wrong...whos rights take precendent there? Just recently in Ireland it became against the law for the registry office worker to refuse to marry homosexuals because it was a denial of their (now equal) human rights...but now its denying the rights to free religious belief of the office worker.


Just wondering from an outside view like, I dont give a shit what people do as long as they dont hurt other people and have respect for me and my beliefs.
Click to expand...

If he is working for a registry office then he is working for the government and has to abide by the government guidelines regardless of religious beliefs. That is called separation of church and state. You know... part of the Constitution that we all live by and do well by... If his religious beliefs conflict with his job performance then why is he working there anyway? Do you think it's right that someone whose religious beliefs are against mixed marriages should be allowed to refuse someone simply for their skin tone?

The new law that passed in Delaware exempts religious institutions from performing same sex marriages if they don't want to. Just like the law in California that was repealed due to Prop. H8TE. If you work for the government you have to follow government policies or work somewhere else. Plain and simple.

So basically you think that Christian sharia law supersedes Constitutional law?
 
Harrekin said:
What if a Christian/Catholic person with strong religious beliefs works in a marraige registry office and are now forced by law to marry homosexual people regardless of the fact they believe it is wrong...whos rights take precendent there? Just recently in Ireland it became against the law for the registry office worker to refuse to marry homosexuals because it was a denial of their (now equal) human rights...but now its denying the rights to free religious belief of the office worker.

Just wondering from an outside view like, I dont give a shit what people do as long as they dont hurt other people and have respect for me and my beliefs.
Click to expand...

I think the rights of the homosexual couple supersede the rights of the registry worker because the registry worker also has the right to find another job that more suits his religious beliefs.
 
Harrekin said:
What if a Christian/Catholic person with strong religious beliefs works in a marraige registry office and are now forced by law to marry homosexual people regardless of the fact they believe it is wrong...whos rights take precendent there? Just recently in Ireland it became against the law for the registry office worker to refuse to marry homosexuals because it was a denial of their (now equal) human rights...but now its denying the rights to free religious belief of the office worker.

Just wondering from an outside view like, I dont give a shit what people do as long as they dont hurt other people and have respect for me and my beliefs.
Click to expand...

To also go along with what Carne said. Legally they have to abide by what the law says. If you want to follow you're religious views/morals, then you would seek other employment and trust that god will reward you for doing so lol. A job is a job is a job though. I was brought up to not celebrate holidays, but I worked at jobs where i had to decorate for it. Doesn't mean I celebrate or believe in it.
 
Harrekin said:
What if a Christian/Catholic person with strong religious beliefs works in a marraige registry office and are now forced by law to marry homosexual people regardless of the fact they believe it is wrong...whos rights take precendent there? Just recently in Ireland it became against the law for the registry office worker to refuse to marry homosexuals because it was a denial of their (now equal) human rights...but now its denying the rights to free religious belief of the office worker.

Just wondering from an outside view like, I dont give a shit what people do as long as they dont hurt other people and have respect for me and my beliefs.
Click to expand...

Religious freedom protects the workers right to believe as he wishes, it does not give him an excuse to oppress others for not sharing the belief.
 
I'm going to echo the previous posts and point out that he doesn't have the right to not do his job, regardless of his religious convictions. I don't think the office worker gets to pick and choose who to marry based on their own opinions anyway; that's what policies and standard operating procedures are for. It's his job to do what his job description says, and it's based on whether or not they fill out the information on the form. A worker at McDonald's doesn't get to put chicken on a customer's cheeseburger because the worker prefers chicken to beef - the company decides the ingredients on a cheeseburger. If he were with a private organization such as a church, then it would be that church's prerogative to decide policy regarding same sex marriages. A government agency has to follow the policies set forth by the government.
 
THAT'S WHY THIS CUNTRY IS THE WAY IT IS. WE GOT gays HAVING CHILDREN! DAT IS FUCKD UP FOR THE KIDS, SEEING 2 DUDES KISSIKNG EACH OTHER, THATS WHY THEY GET BULLIED AND PIKD ON IN SCHOOL. THANKS TO THE gays DAT HAVE THE,! COME ON PPL OPEN UR EYES, THIS COUNTRY IS SOFT AND WEAK, AND ALLOWING gays TOO MARRY AND WHAT NOT IS MAKING SOFTER AND SOFTER PPL. THATS WHY GOD BURNED THAT CITY IN THE DESERT, ALL THE FILTH AND SIN.

THOSE WHO SUPPORT IT MIGHT AS WELL BE gay AS WELL and brn in HELL!

JUS MY 2CENTS
 
olylifter420 said:
THAT'S WHY THIS CUNTRY IS THE WAY IT IS. WE GOT gays HAVING CHILDREN! DAT IS FUCKD UP FOR THE KIDS, SEEING 2 DUDES KISSIKNG EACH OTHER, THATS WHY THEY GET BULLIED AND PIKD ON IN SCHOOL. THANKS TO THE gays DAT HAVE THE,! COME ON PPL OPEN UR EYES, THIS COUNTRY IS SOFT AND WEAK, AND ALLOWING gays TOO MARRY AND WHAT NOT IS MAKING SOFTER AND SOFTER PPL. THATS WHY GOD BURNED THAT CITY IN THE DESERT, ALL THE FILTH AND SIN.

THOSE WHO SUPPORT IT MIGHT AS WELL BE gay AS WELL and brn in HELL!

JUS MY 2CENTS
Click to expand...

LOL @ "cuntry"
 
AND WHO OF ALL PPL CAME OUT WIT DIS CRAP? da vatican! DA church WIT DA MOST SEXUAL MOLESTATION OF YOUNG BOYS!! WOW PPL, U R PREETTY IGNORANT! IT IS ONLY LOGICAL TO SAY DAT U ALL WHO SUPPORT DIS gay CRAP, MORE THEN LIKELY SUPPORT THE MOLESTATION OF YOUNG BOYS. ITS SAME SEX RITE? OH, BUT THE AGE, U SAY. ITS STILL SAME SEX, AND AS SAME SEX SUPPORTRS, U MUST SUPPORT THESE ACTS OF SIM AS WELL.
 
One more.thing, I dnt give a fuk if I get "vilified" or whtevr for not supporting queers! Jus like u tards who support gay crap who think they have all the rights in da world, well so do I, so fuk off
 
I hope our little fledgling gay boy olylifter comes to terms with his homosexuality soon and has lots of butt sex. He seems like a bottom to me.
 
carne seca, ur truly a fag. Ive prob had more pussy then u will evr have queer! A "bottom" wtf is dat?


No wonder u support it, ur frm new mexico, I understand now. Tht seems like "a bottom" to me, lol
 
olylifter420 said:
carne seca, ur truly a fag. Ive prob had more pussy then u will evr have queer! A "bottom" wtf is dat?


No wonder u support it, ur frm new mexico, I understand now. Tht seems like "a bottom" to me, lol
Click to expand...

Hrmm if he is a fag, then he doesn't care about pussy does he? Why do you think that is an insult? I mean he could say, "I've had more dick than you'll ever have", but since you don't like dick, you don't care right? Did you apply even the slightest thought before you wrote those words?

Do you actually think about any of the things you say? You think that where a person is from has anything to do with the subject at hand? You think that personal attacks about irrelevant facts makes you a bigger badass? Are you really not embarrassed by the words and concepts you convey? If not, then you aren't paying attention to yourself.

I am not vilifying you for your views on gays. I am saying that your inconsistent logic, lack of valid points and attention to non issues leaves your opinion without merit.
 
You might as well have typed out a calculus equation. You would have the same comprehension level. :p

The funny thing is, I think we're about equal on the "pussy-getting" scale. Which is zero. I can, however, be assured that I've been hit on by more women in one month than he has his entire lifetime. I can't tell you how many times a woman has said to me that she would be the one to turn me straight. :)

Come out of the closet oly. It's much brighter out here in the sunlight. ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top