Don´t you mean PLATO ????
Pluto was Mickey Mouse´s dog.
American education, yeah, right.
Is this sarcasm or do you really not know what Plato has to do with government? Plato's The Republic was a large influence on the framers of the Constitution. If you are going to talk about the intent of the framers then you should probably know how their ideas were developed and where the concepts came from.Call the kettle black bitch.
Our education system uses GOOGLE to find Plutocracy as a legitimate and common phrase.
WTF would PLATO or a frickin cartoon dog have anything to do with this subject? I don't see the correlation. YOU are the ignorant one.
You just put your hoof right in your mouth !!
Plato is pertinent to this because the individuals that wrote the founding documents of our actual government were influenced by his writing. The Plutocracy was your point, not reality. I do not think you even made a good argument for it in the first place. Since I do not think you are saying that wealthy people actually have more power and resolve than the federal government itself then you must be talking more about policy. Money is only an advantage in swaying policy because so many people do not vote and or pay little enough attention that sound bites and advertisements can buy their vote. The most broken part of our system is in the apathetic and unintelligent majority, but that is not the same thing as having an institutional barrier. In a lot of ways our current system really hasn't even been tested, and really won't be until all citizens exercise their power to vote.No I'm not being sarcastic. Again WTF does PLATO and his "Republic" have anything to do with Plutocracy ? Plato as a LARGE influence? Checks and Balance? I can see that
Plato was gay anyways so his thoughts are null and void
When you only have the choice to vote for one of 2 evils, you still get evil. Voting won't do shit to change things. Revolution will.Plato is pertinent to this because the individuals that wrote the founding documents of our actual government were influenced by his writing. The Plutocracy was your point, not reality. I do not think you even made a good argument for it in the first place. Since I do not think you are saying that wealthy people actually have more power and resolve than the federal government itself then you must be talking more about policy. Money is only an advantage in swaying policy because so many people do not vote and or pay little enough attention that sound bites and advertisements can buy their vote. The most broken part of our system is in the apathetic and unintelligent majority, but that is not the same thing as having an institutional barrier. In a lot of ways our current system really hasn't even been tested, and really won't be until all citizens exercise their power to vote.