US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia Is A Racist POS!

Is Scalia a racist piece of shit masquerading as a Supreme Court Justice?

  • Yep. Racist.

  • Nope. Not racist. Black kids don't need to be in advanced colleges

  • Keep stomping until you're up to your neck in it

  • Tyler Durden is my hero

  • Mmmmmmmm Dooooooonuuuuuts....


Results are only viewable after voting.

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Ya mean you're not voting for Queen Hillary? Hate to disappoint the Sanders lemmings, but she is a shoe-in and Sanders enabled it with such good-ol-boy public rhetoric like "nobody cares about your damn emails!"

Sorry good-ol-boy Sanderstein, you don't speak nor represent honest, hard working Americans.
Since you neither work nor are intellectually honest, we can see why you wouldn't vote for him.
 

Uncle Ben

Well-Known Member
Since you neither work nor are intellectually honest, we can see why you wouldn't vote for him.
You seem to know a lot about my daily activities. Where did you acquire such insight and wisdom?

Again, what's with this "we" shit? Talking to that lil mouse in your glass of Kool-aid again or do you speak for all of man kind?
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Fuck your bullshit, fat boy. He FARTS more facts on this forum than you'll ever cite. You just need an education... poor victim of Republican funding cuts for schools that you are.
Dems ran the country when I went to school. You and your "facts". Typically, your "facts" are just self-serving/self-deluding assumptions.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Ha! That's rich. You mean intolerant like not wanting gay couples to have same rights as everyone else? Or not wanting any immigrants or refugees entering the country? Or supporting the death penalty?

Like that?
No, not like that. Is English your second language?
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Acting your age?
Demonstrating yours. Guess it went over your head. Here, I'll dumb it down for you:

"Apparently it is for you" is much the same as the childhood retort "I'm rubber and you're glue, nanner, nanner, nanner."
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
So you call liberals intolerant and because you disagree with these progressive judges you're going to denigrate them? Lol. Stick to your garden, it's where you make the most sense.

We can debate all we want on who's more intolerant. I'll bet you $500 I can find more intolerance in the right.
Only because you can't see your own intolerance.
 

bravedave

Well-Known Member
Trivial. Those two are the only two who *might* not be on the take like the rest of them. Not certain, but that's my hunch.

.
I think Warren's fraud was pretty egregious and shows a pretty deep, non-trivial, character flaw.

I certainly can give a pass to Bernie on the DNC thing. However, he is a walking, talking example of a character flaw.
 

pnwmystery

Well-Known Member
Only because you can't see your own intolerance.
That's rich coming from the likes of you.

Now, that's funny. YOU not knowing liberals are fascist!
Didn't you just accuse someone of doing the same thing as "I'm rubber you're glue...." and how childish it is? Look at you right here. It's really funny though because fascism never comes from the left. Politically and historically it's always from the right. Both Roger Griffin and Aristotle Kallis professors of history at Oxford and Lancaster respectively squarely put fascism on the far-right, as well as pretty much every politically theory. Sorry, you don't get to rewrite that, not until you come out with a book that details your argument for this better than a historian and political theorist at Oxford, and pretty much every political theorist since fascism came about.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
That's rich coming from the likes of you.



Didn't you just accuse someone of doing the same thing as "I'm rubber you're glue...." and how childish it is? Look at you right here. It's really funny though because fascism never comes from the left. Politically and historically it's always from the right. Both Roger Griffin and Aristotle Kallis professors of history at Oxford and Lancaster respectively squarely put fascism on the far-right, as well as pretty much every politically theory. Sorry, you don't get to rewrite that, not until you come out with a book that details your argument for this better than a historian and political theorist at Oxford, and pretty much every political theorist since fascism came about.
...and what really gets me is that he's using classic fascist information control tactics here... with little success outside of the right wing clique, but self importance knows no bounds.

Can't wait for him to start bashing those Oxford liberals, lol

Let's wait and see if he knows who attends there?
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
That's rich coming from the likes of you.



Didn't you just accuse someone of doing the same thing as "I'm rubber you're glue...." and how childish it is? Look at you right here. It's really funny though because fascism never comes from the left. Politically and historically it's always from the right. Both Roger Griffin and Aristotle Kallis professors of history at Oxford and Lancaster respectively squarely put fascism on the far-right, as well as pretty much every politically theory. Sorry, you don't get to rewrite that, not until you come out with a book that details your argument for this better than a historian and political theorist at Oxford, and pretty much every political theorist since fascism came
about.
"as well as pretty much every politically theory." Yes, so pretty much everything, eh?
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
...and what really gets me is that he's using classic fascist information control tactics here... with little success outside of the right wing clique, but self importance knows no bounds.

Can't wait for him to start bashing those Oxford liberals, lol

Let's wait and see if he knows who attends there?
You clearly didn't.
 
Top