Are you completely insane?
The parents of the child did not want the child getting a transfusion on the basis of it was against their religious beliefs (they were Mormons or something)
Parents have every right to choose what treatments the child receives or doesn't, you're obviously not a parent if you don't respect this.
In the Savita case, the doctors COULDN'T have acted because the law disallowed them, she died of septicemia however it's unclear if even an immediate abortion could've prevented her death.
How in Gods name can you blame a doctor for doing their job exactly as the law prescribes?
Do we want doctors breaking the law now?
How about if the doctor decided he could save 8 people with your organs and decided to just break the law and harvest them? Would we applaud them for having the foresight to break the law like that?