Doer
Well-Known Member
Yes, except, to me these are linked. And are therefore equally discounted. They don't stand one without the other as a BB supoprt, they prop each other. That's how I see it.Afaik, Doer, there are independent corroborations (not conclusive, but highly supportive) of/for the Bang.
1) the microwave background radiation.
2) The very-large-scale galactic distribution ... the "cobwebby" unevenness that shows up when the scale approaches a gigaparsec. My 2¢ ... cn
It's the MBR folks that see a pattern to the cobwebbyness. Cobweb universe is one of the basic mysteries. Why is it not a smooth disribution? How can a Bang condense into Cobwebs? If we can link that to something....MBR has compelling unevenness as well.
My problem here is the MBR. If the spaceframe is not static and not Constant based, we can't surmise that the radiation has cooled by a standard rate. The idea is if you rev the MBR back up over 18 billion years, you get the energy of the BB. That takes a Constant.
Another thing we don't know is the scale of Expansion's acceleration rate. Is it universal or patchy? I'm going to GUESS patchy. Patchy across time, as well as space. There could be random contactions and expansions happening right NOW, in a patchy universe.
So, cobweb and MBR could be the result of Patchiness in our manifold. That's just a guess.
But, I'd say surely,the A1 standard candle proof of Acceleration as overtaken even these slim "evidence."