Where is Darren Wilson's Justice?

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
Poor tiny penis can't read. too dumb to see that it doesn't say civil rights, it says civil rights ACT.

Poor tiny penis....

Click to expand...
nice try.

the distinction is meaningless, since it still means you support discrimination on the sole basis of skin color.

racist.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
jahbrudda said:
You mean the thread where you said the Northwest Passage was navigable year round?
It was so ridiculous I made it my signature. LMAO
Click to expand...
Yeah, that thread. The same one where you cited the guy from KUSI NEWS San Diego channel 51 as some kind of expert, cited NASA studies countless times which only bolster the IPCC position and you got schooled so many times by so many people and demonstrated that you don't know the difference between an ad hominem and an insult.

That thread. Don't worry, I'll bump it when it falls off the first page of threads just so people can keep seeing how stupid you are, as if being a soc
NoDrama said:
Better than relying on the ramblings of a cartoonist.

woops
Click to expand...
You mean Cook? The guy with a degree in physics who is working on a graduate degree in this very field? You mean the guy who co-authored peer reviewed scientific papers?

Coming from the guy who copy pasted half a wikipedia page and called it a citation, I'm not the least bit surprised that you think he is discredited by the fact that he drew cartoons.
 
jahbrudda

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
You mean Cook? The guy with a degree in physics who is working on a graduate degree in this very field? You mean the guy who co-authored peer reviewed scientific papers?

Coming from the guy who copy pasted half a wikipedia page and called it a citation, I'm not the least bit surprised that you think he is discredited by the fact that he drew cartoons.
Click to expand...
No, this John Cook, the cartoonist who admits he's not a scientist. :lol:

Another AC FAIL

The Truth about Skeptical Science


Source: Skeptical Science Forums
Skeptical Science is a climate alarmist website created by a self-employed cartoonist, John Cook (who apparently pretends to be a Nazi). It is moderated by zealots who ruthlessly censor any and all form of dissent from their alarmist position. This way they can pretend to win arguments, when in reality they have all been refuted. The abuse and censorship does not pertain to simply any dissenting commentator there but to highly credentialed and respected climate scientists as well; Dr. Pielke Sr. has unsuccessfully attempted to engage in discussions there only to be childishly taunted and censored, while Dr. Michaels has been dishonestly quoted and smeared. The irony of the site's oxymoronic name "Skeptical Science" is that the site is not skeptical of even the most extreme alarmist positions.

John Cook is now desperately trying to cover up his background that he was employed as a cartoonist for over a decade with no prior employment history in academia or climate science.

Thanks to the Wayback Machine we can reveal what his website originally said,

"I'm not a climatologist or a scientist but a self employed cartoonist" - John Cook, Skeptical Science
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
Oh look a photoshopped pic...

FYI, he CO-AUTHORED studies. So even if he were discredited, the peer reviewed research is still valid, since it was peer fucking reviewed. Keep trying to understand this, some day you will.
Click to expand...
lol, beenthere can't even tell the truth when showing a picture of his arch nemesis.
 
sheskunk

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
Yeah, that thread. The same one where you cited the guy from KUSI NEWS San Diego channel 51 as some kind of expert, cited NASA studies countless times which only bolster the IPCC position and you got schooled so many times by so many people and demonstrated that you don't know the difference between an ad hominem and an insult.

That thread. Don't worry, I'll bump it when it falls off the first page of threads just so people can keep seeing how stupid you are, as if being a sock puppet and troll wasn't enough.
Click to expand...

I see YOU as the dumb one. Just so you know. ;)
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
nice try.

the distinction is meaningless, since it still means you support discrimination on the sole basis of skin color.

racist.
Click to expand...
Sorry tiny penis, me telling you what ron paul's position is does not mean I support it, it just means you are too dumb and need someone to explain it to you since you can't read and all. Dyslexia and tiny penis syndrome are the hallmarks of Stormfront veterans.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
Sorry tiny penis, me telling you what ron paul's position is does not mean I support it, it just means you are too dumb and need someone to explain it to you since you can't read and all. Dyslexia and tiny penis syndrome are the hallmarks of Stormfront veterans.
Click to expand...
you literally called the civil rights act unconstitutional, which means you think it should be legal to discriminate on the sole basis of skin color.

that's racist.

not only that, you are too cowardly to even own up to your own stated position. but then again, cowardice is a prerequisite for racism.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top