NorthwestBuds
Well-Known Member
And the truth shall set you free.
Why Vote Against Republicans?
- Thread starter NorthwestBuds
- Start date
mr.red
Well-Known Member
WELL
Both dems and republicans suck
I like rush though, but he is conservative.
I am a libertarian and think that everyone else has it wrong.
And people need to stop blaming bush for everything.
Sure he fucked up.
Did no one notice that obama just wasted a fuck load of OUR money.
And spent more than was spent in the history of our country..
The man is an amazing speaker.
But I am thinking he has no clue what to do.
It is common sense people, you cannot save/get money by spending it.
Republicans suck too, but I like them more because I want less gov.
People really like to think the gov can't tell them how to live but should provide for them.
Provide for yourselves people, do what you like. As long as no one is hurt.
Gov is there for protecting us, not to be a parental figure.
Both dems and republicans suck
I like rush though, but he is conservative.
I am a libertarian and think that everyone else has it wrong.
And people need to stop blaming bush for everything.
Sure he fucked up.
Did no one notice that obama just wasted a fuck load of OUR money.
And spent more than was spent in the history of our country..
The man is an amazing speaker.
But I am thinking he has no clue what to do.
It is common sense people, you cannot save/get money by spending it.
Republicans suck too, but I like them more because I want less gov.
People really like to think the gov can't tell them how to live but should provide for them.
Provide for yourselves people, do what you like. As long as no one is hurt.
Gov is there for protecting us, not to be a parental figure.
TheBrutalTruth
Well-Known Member
You might be a Democrat if...
... You think that it's more important to get a BJ from an Intern instead of accepting the offer from a foreign nation to arrest a terrorist leader that has already attacked your nation.
... If you pay more attention to what a politician wears, how they do their hair, and how they walk then what their stances are on a campaign issue.
... If you planned on voting for Hillary because she was a woman, or for Obama because he was Black, despite disagreeing with the vast majority of their platforms.
... If you actually watch CNN
... Believe that some speech should not be Free, because it's "mean"
... Still haven't gotten over Bush, despite the fact that he's no longer President.
... Actually believe in Global Warming, despite a lot of evidence in the contrary, former supporters speaking against it, and the fact that it's clear that Gore is just manipulating the issue for his own private gain.
... If you think that accepting contributions from corporations make Republicans evil, but doesn't have the same effect on Democrats.
... If you hide bribe money in a freezer.
... If you believe that people like Obama actually give a damn about you.
... If you think that Watergate was more massive than Clinton's Filegate Scandal.
... Believe that the government can make you "safer"
... Want the government to make you "safer" by taking away your fire arms and then releasing violent criminals on the streets where they can rob, rape and kill you.
... Believe that releasing violent criminals back into society will some how change them.
... Oppose the Death Penalty, but support Abortion
BadDog40
Well-Known Member
You know, the fascist that your boy Bush put in there as Secretary for Homeland Security who used the Constitution to wipe his ass with.
Did I mention he also wrote The Patriot Act?
TheBrutalTruth
Well-Known Member
See, I don't really pay attention to small details like that, because they are irrelevant. Who cares about who wrote the Patriot Act, all that matters is that the idiot Bush signed it, and the idiots in Congress passed it.
Both parties are equally guilty of acting in a way that is contrary to the interests of the United States as a nation, economically, in global politics, and on Defense issues.
Both parties are guilty of sending billions in tribute to foreign nations by not pulling our soldiers back to the United States after a war.
It's the most comical thing ever when you think about it. Everyone goes on and on about how the United States does not build empires. Yes, we do, we just pretend not to.
We are still occupying Germany and Japan. We are still defending the Province of South Korea, and even after Obama's "Withdrawal" we're going to be defending the Province of Iraq with 50,000 soldiers.
Both parties are incompetent.
I think we need a new political party. Of course, in my opinion, the best candidates would be the combination of the Constitutional Party and Libertarian Party with some of the dumber ideas thrown out.
Like the Libertarians stance on the borders, and the Constitutional Party's stance on Nationalizing all Foreign Assets here in this country. Of course, the second depends on how they intend on accomplishing that nationalization. If they intend to purchase the assets from the foreign corporations with their voluntary assent or through eminent domain, then I don't see a problem with it. If they intend on not compensating the foreign corporations for their property here, then I see a problem with it.
There's some other issues that would need to be modified for them to be truly viable.
But even in their current forms, both parties represent better alternatives than the Democrats and the Republicans.
monkeyinmywhitehouse
New Member
bucket head look how many wars were fought by dems= (cowardcrats) last century? how many dem war dead???ww2 over 450,000 Vietnam 63,000 all dem wars, bush 5,000 just look at the numbers dumb ass trader you should be hanged!
Drgreenz
Well-Known Member
Are you all kidding me??? Maybe people should start to look into just exactly how and when this recession started. Bush until 2006 even with the war cut government spending by 18% and had an aproval rating of over 65%. in 2006 we elected a vast democrat majority in both the house and senate. then came the regulation over freddy and fanny. yes they were made to give sub prime mortgages to people who would otherwise not qualify for shit. thats what started the recession not Bush's war or spending. Look at history, every time the house and senate are democrat controled there has been a recession... every time. the president no matter who he is doesnt write law he can merly aprove or veto and in a veto case the senate just revotes. study a little bit about your government America... No wonder this country is going to shit. its because we elect socialist. do some research and turn off the mainstream media ie: Clinton News Network-cnn
are you ignorant? I think you are.
Obama just spent ten trillion in the first month and a half.he just beat bush's record
Drgreenz
Well-Known Member
that explains it pretty good...
"When the governments stops governing for the people and begins governing over them it is every patriots duty to rise up with arms and begin anew..."-John Adams
"The tree of liberty must be watered in the blood of patriots..."-Thomas Jefferson
Yes I'ld say start buying and hiding your guns. Times are getting interesting...
they will know who to blame for the 6 million foreclosures this year.the 7 million lost jobs.
they will know who to blame for inflation through the roof and a unemployment rate of over 10% advertised and 25%. unadvertised(the government cooks the books real bad when it comes to numbers,they are always in the government favor the real numbers are always different)
obama and the democrats are going to get the blame.you said you all would fix it..well get to fixing .all you seem to be able to do is point fingers .try and place blame,this is going to be a ugly four years.oh yea .dont think you are pulling the wool over anyones eyes around here.the federal reserve under greenspan when clinton was in office took interest rates to 1% snf held them there for a year.this is what created these bubbles .why did greenspan do this shit? cause greenspan is a fucking liberal and used monetery policy as a tool in favor of his politics.
who was it that dictated to private banks to loan to inner city FOLKS who had no track record or ability to repay? oh yea..it was the democrats under clinton wasnt it?i bet you forgot that didnt you?i bet you have also forgot about NAFTA and GATT and permanent most favored trade status all under clinton didnt you?
liberals are such ignorant losers.
they think they can bull shit their way through life.
well let me tell you something,there is always a time when you have to pay the band for the dance.t
time to pay up.
FlyLikeAnEagle
Well-Known Member
Where do you get your facts from? Rush Limpballs? Bush's approval rating sunk to below 40% starting in 2005 and was down to 31% by 2006.
http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm
NorthwestBuds
Well-Known Member
Max your imitation of an uneducated, raving nut job is spot on!
joker152
Well-Known Member
hey max....that ten trillion dollar figure is still fairly stinky, you should give those numbers a little time to air out after you pull them out of your ass next time cause it reeks in here. in all seriousness where did you get that figure? rush? billo? almost half if not more of the money that has been allocated since obama took office was already intended to be spent And allocated by the next president. most of it was there already, so the question sir is, are you ignorant?
NorthwestBuds
Well-Known Member
when max has to flat out lie to make a point, what's the point?
CrackerJax
New Member
Prediction:
Republican SWEEP in 23 months. (write it down stoners)
out.
Republican SWEEP in 23 months. (write it down stoners)
out.
medicineman
New Member
No..............