zimmerman news

Status
Not open for further replies.
Travon_Martin_Day_Skittles_.png
 
UncleBuck said:
you didn't post the full interview either, meaning you lied.

the fact is that i posted enough context to establish when he said that he was walking back towards martin.

the fact is that zimm lied over and over and over again.
Click to expand...

"didnt see him"

"looked to make sure he wasnt there."

"when i came back, obviously he was waiting somewhere"

so yes zimmie "walked back towards him" in the sense that he walked back towards his car and martin was hiding there, resulting in zimmie walking right into martin';s ambush. the jurors figured out this simple sequence of events, but clearly :

A ) It's to complex for your drug addled mind to comprehend.

B ) You will say anything to reassure your position that zimmie is a depraved racist killer with murder on his mind, and martin is an "innocent child" butchered for the crime of being black...

C ) youre just a habitual liar.

D ) All of the above.
 
Dr Kynes said:
so yes zimmie "walked back towards him" in the sense that he walked back towards his car and martin was hiding there
Click to expand...

that would be literally impossible to reconcile with the timeline, much less physical reality or zimm's own reenactment of the events.

thanks for proving that you are an idiot.
 
UncleBuck said:
as if fabricated post office stories, doctoring pictures of obama to makehim look "ghetto", and posting stormfront links didn't make it obvious enough, you made sure to remove all doubt once again by smearing a dead black kid.

keep it classy!
Click to expand...

*As
*Obama
*make him

The truth hurts doesn't it. :lol:
Oh, by the way, you're repeating yourself again. Butt hurt. :clap:
Trayvoning-Tumblr2-620x229.jpeg
 
UncleBuck said:
you didn't post the full interview either, meaning you lied.

the fact is that i posted enough context to establish when he said that he was walking back towards martin.

the fact is that zimm lied over and over and over again.
Click to expand...

Buck, you are a bald faced liar trying to lynch an innocent man. I don't even bother to look up your quotes because you have lied over and over. Trayvon's corner is filled with your type.
 
desert dude said:
Buck, you are a bald faced liar trying to lynch an innocent man. I don't even bother to look up your quotes because you have lied over and over. Trayvon's corner is filled with your type.
Click to expand...

not trying to "lynch an innocent man" (nice race bait reference, by the way. zimm isn't innocent either).

all i'm doing is correcting lies that people like you put out there.

i'm so sorry that zimmerman's own words about "and then when i walked back towards him" (after hanging up with dispatch) make you so upset. lrn2reality, sistah.
 
cannabineer said:
Specify. List, with especial emphasis on those that allow employment within one's field of training/expertise. cn
Click to expand...

one may choose their field of training/expertise though.

in fact, it would behoove one to choose the right field if they wish to make a living without signing a W2. you might choose to train in farming, hunting, or trapping instead of actuarial sciences, for example.

no one is ever forced to become an actuary.
 
UncleBuck said:
there's no evidence of that.

or, another way to say it, is that there is as much evidence for that as there is to support the theory that zimm kept on looking for martin.

actually, i am being modest. there is more evidence that zimmerman went looking for martin. here are zimmerman's own words: "and then when i walked back towards him".

so much for an ambush, turns out that is simply your racist fantasy. no surprise there, more racism from the forum's resident race-douche.

if zimm just knew his place and went back to his car, martin would still be alive. fact.
Click to expand...

He's telling it from the perspective of AFTER THE FACT you moron. He isn't relating what was going on in his head at that moment. He had no idea where TM was, only the general direction he ran off in. But over a year later he relates it that way because now he knows exactly where TM was, he got ambushed by him.
 
SirGreenThumb said:
*As
*Obama
*make him

The truth hurts doesn't it. :lol:
Oh, by the way, you're repeating yourself again. Butt hurt. :clap:
Trayvoning-Tumblr2-620x229.jpeg
Click to expand...



i am totally nuetral in this whole situation, as i stated before, i do not have enough of MY OWN investigation and research to know or think i know what happened, therefore it is NOT my place to say anything about this situation whether guilty or not guilty, i simply do not beleive the BS im fed from a spoon thru the media about what happened, sorry but i dont just beleive whatever im told, therefore i cannot comment on how i feel or what i think happened or who is right or wrong, HOWEVER


this is low....to post something like this IMO is not right...we are talking about a 17 year old kid here guys....drug addict, pot smoker, gang banger, gun toter whatever the fuck you want to call him or think of him, it doesnt make it right to post demeaning and deragatory pics of a dead CHILD....come on, have a little more fucking class guys...im not pointing the finger at one person, but when i see something like this im not going to sit back and say nothing




GROW UP





have some respect for a dead child AND YOURSELF






god dammit.
 
NoDrama said:
He's telling it from the perspective of AFTER THE FACT you moron. He isn't relating what was going on in his head at that moment. He had no idea where TM was, only the general direction he ran off in. But over a year later he relates it that way because now he knows exactly where TM was, he got ambushed by him.
Click to expand...

that was from interrogation the night of the incident, dumbass.

his story changes from "so i walked back towards him" to "i think he came from over there or something" to "he jumped out of the bushes and sucker punched me out of nowhere".

he keeps on changing and revising and exaggerating his story to be worse and worse. there's a reason why innocent people don't need to do anything like that.
 
Bombur said:
How does it violate the constitution? The amendment says nothing about private business owners and who they're allowed to deny service as far as I know.
Click to expand...

It violates the unconstitutional civil rights act. I wonder if I can ban all who have ugly common brown eyes.
 
UncleBuck said:
that was from interrogation the night of the incident, dumbass.

his story changes from "so i walked back towards him" to "i think he came from over there or something" to "he jumped out of the bushes and sucker punched me out of nowhere".

he keeps on changing and revising and exaggerating his story to be worse and worse. there's a reason why innocent people don't need to do anything like that.
Click to expand...

Interrogation happened BEFORE he encountered TM? Boggle
 
UncleBuck said:
you are so easily confused, it hurts.

tell me what date this interrogation occurred.

http://www.talkleft.com/zimm/singletontranscript1.pdf

now tell me which date the incident happened.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Trayvon_Martin

hint: they both happened on february 26, 2012.

have fun sleeping it off, champ.
Click to expand...
Wow your trying to tell me that he did not know of TM's whereabouts during the interrogation? And you think I need to sleep it off? How about returning to reality there space cadet? The interrogation happened after Zimmerman already had his scuffle with Travon. Don't try to say otherwise.
 
NoDrama said:
Wow your trying to tell me that he did not know of TM's whereabouts during the interrogation? And you think I need to sleep it off? How about returning to reality there space cadet? The interrogation happened after Zimmerman already had his scuffle with Travon. Don't try to say otherwise.
Click to expand...

you must be insanely drunk because i never said they interrogated zimmerman before the scuffle. where did you get that idea from?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top