Doer
Well-Known Member
Hey, how do you know where I live? Is that from google maps?
zimmerman news
- Thread starter desert dude
- Start date
- Status
Doer
Well-Known Member
Hold on...what's this now, my troolie trools? A very boring DNA preso, finally, I see to point.
If Zims story is straight there should be some blood of Zim's on Trevon's clothes, hands, (holding Zims mouth), etc
So, there seems to be no Zim blood from an instantly broken nose, anywhere. So....it ain't over.
If Zims story is straight there should be some blood of Zim's on Trevon's clothes, hands, (holding Zims mouth), etc
So, there seems to be no Zim blood from an instantly broken nose, anywhere. So....it ain't over.
SirGreenThumb
Well-Known Member
Now you all tell me, I felt my neurological receptors starting to misfire trying to decipher all that.. I bet Doer and Cannabineer could have one hell of a conversation.
SirGreenThumb
Well-Known Member
I can really only decipher moo goo gai pan.And he admits to being able to decipher intelligible thought.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Why do you assume there was no blood?Hold on...what's this now, my troolie trools? A very boring DNA preso, finally, I see to point. If Zims story is straight there should be some blood of Zim's on Trevon's clothes, hands, (holding Zims mouth), etc So, there seems to be no Zim blood from an instantly broken nose, anywhere. So....it ain't over.
SirGreenThumb
Well-Known Member
That's what she said...
Doer
Well-Known Member
Why do you assume to say, "why do you assume?" All I have said is what evidence seems to be coming in.
So, if you assume you are making an ass out of u and me.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i believe his assertion is based on a little thing called forensic evidence, or in this case, the complete lack thereof.
but maybe the judge and hury will agree to see things from the perspective of you and desert dud, where evidence is no matter and interrogators get fired for asking questions.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
Poor, Bucky, all butt hurt.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
why would i be butthurt that you said interrogators should be fired for asking questions?
why would i be butthurt that there is no blood on martin's hands, cuffs, or fingernails, despite supposedly suffocating zimmerman on his bloody face?
these seem more like things that would make you butthurt. so i call projection.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
gimpwoman = deluded school girl
desert dude
Well-Known Member
Gee, Buck, it looks like you almost got a degree in psychology too.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
serino should be fired for asking questions!
Doer
Well-Known Member
desert dude
Well-Known Member
Hey, Buck, did you catch the latest prosecutorial back fire? Their witness bolstered the defense case that self defense was reasonable in this case.
"They called as a witness Alexis Francisco Carter, the military attorney who taught the class. Carter described Zimmerman as one of his better students and said the neighborhood watch volunteer got an "A'' in his class.
Under cross-examination, Carter gave two definitions of legal concepts that seemed to bolster the defense's case. He explained that a person can make a self-defense argument if the person has a "reasonable apprehension" of death or great bodily harm.
."Play video
"It's imminent fear. The fact alone that there isn't an injury doesn't necessarily mean that the person didn't have a reasonable apprehension or fear," Carter said. "The fact that there are injuries might support there was reasonable apprehension and fear."
Carter also explained the concept of "imperfect self-defense," when a person is being threatened but then counters with a force disproportionately greater than the force used against them.
"They would have the right to defend themselves?" said defense attorney Don West.
"Right," Carter said.
http://news.yahoo.com/expert-no-martin-dna-gun-grip-200653214.html
SirGreenThumb
Well-Known Member
Oh, Oh, Don't forget he is JAG.Hey, Buck, did you catch the latest prosecutorial back fire? Their witness bolstered the defense case that self defense was reasonable in this case.
"They called as a witness Alexis Francisco Carter, the military attorney who taught the class. Carter described Zimmerman as one of his better students and said the neighborhood watch volunteer got an "A'' in his class.
Under cross-examination, Carter gave two definitions of legal concepts that seemed to bolster the defense's case. He explained that a person can make a self-defense argument if the person has a "reasonable apprehension" of death or great bodily harm.
."Play video
"It's imminent fear. The fact alone that there isn't an injury doesn't necessarily mean that the person didn't have a reasonable apprehension or fear," Carter said. "The fact that there are injuries might support there was reasonable apprehension and fear."
Carter also explained the concept of "imperfect self-defense," when a person is being threatened but then counters with a force disproportionately greater than the force used against them.
"They would have the right to defend themselves?" said defense attorney Don West.
"Right," Carter said.
http://news.yahoo.com/expert-no-martin-dna-gun-grip-200653214.html
FlyLikeAnEagle
Well-Known Member
Another day, another lie Zimmerman gets caught up in.
- Status