zimmerman news

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not sure which is more messed up, the fact that she is the star witness, or the fact that the judge is helping the prosecution.
 
NO RE-Direct on the star witness... You know what? The prosecution knows they have a dog of a case. This whole trial is just to keep blacks from rioting. for some reason there are thousands of blacks chanting 'I am Treyvon Martin'. I hate Zimmerman and Treyvon. Couple of morons. Georgy has no business with a hand gun and Mr. Martin was a thug
 
The prosecution desperately tried to impugn Ms. Lauer's testimony by claiming that Lauer is a twitter "follower" of Zimmerman's brother. I don't know how twitter works and it seems the prosecutor doesn't either.
 
Impman said:
NO RE-Direct on the star witness... You know what? The prosecution knows they have a dog of a case. This whole trial is just to keep blacks from rioting. for some reason there are thousands of blacks chanting 'I am Treyvon Martin'. I hate Zimmerman and Treyvon. Couple of morons. Georgy has no business with a hand gun and Mr. Martin is a thug
Click to expand...

That could explain why the prosecution chose murder 2, which is an impossibility in this case. They knew they had no case so chose the highest possible bar because they knew they had no case.
 
Is it just me or does the judge seem confused all the time? Seems like her first trial or something.
 
Lauer testified that the first sound of the fight that she heard was at the T of the walkway. Not sure about Buck's ravings but it seems to me that has protested against that with vehemence.
 
Vague sounds and dark figures. What are the facts though? Zimmermans face beat to shit and a dead 17 year old. Grass stains on the knees of the kid and one bullet through his heart. Tragedy .... what a symbolic event though. it epitomizes black and white social relations so perfectly. no communication, trust and so much violent feelings.
 
echelon1k1 said:
"If I had a son, he'd look like treyvon"
Click to expand...

had no idea obama posted in this thread. which post was that?

:dunce:

dumbass race baiting moron.

Doer said:
Well, I've been watching it on CourtTV (HLN) The big gal was very compelling. They will try again, today, to impeach her on some of the minor details that she changed from the deposition to the testimony. But, she is a feisty witness who calls out the Defense guy, by name. "I told you, already."

She doesn't watch any News-joke. Good girl. She lectured the Defense on the murder investigation, TV show "48 Hours."

"Yo suppose to call me!", she snipped. So cool. A true US citizen that does not give a damn about the insinuation of puppy love for Trevon." (I would guess, as a motive to lie)

"Do that seem like lots of text to you?" Then she rolls here eyes.

I'm in love. :) The delicious disrespect for all but the Judge is very refreshing.
Click to expand...


her borderling mental retardation and attitude kinda worked in her favor. i haven't watched day 2's cross yet, but from what i just read, she stood up to the heat.
 
The fact that she keeps changing her answers depending on who she talks to at the time doesn't make her a very credible witness.
 
SirGreenThumb said:
So you seem to think that Zimmerman had enough foresight to decide, "I'm gonna go up to this person, invoke him to punch me a few times and then shoot him."
That is an ignorant way for you to think because by your own words Zimmerman kept changing his story, so by your observations Z would have been to stupid to have that foresight.
Click to expand...

that is quite the ignorant, non-sequitir rebuttal to the facts of the case, which i will repeat since they make you blabber moronically: there is no evidence that martin attacked zimmerman, it is known that martin ran, and it is known that zimmerman followed martin multiple times.

all of this suggests that martin was NOT the attacker, since he ran and zimm pursued.


SirGreenThumb said:
Yea, it is so dumb of me to think that having a civil conversation could have saved a life. Yep, so very very stupid.
Click to expand...

no, what i was calling dumb was you grammar.

do you even bother to read what you respond to, or do you just reach blindly into a hat of irrelevant douchebaggery?


SirGreenThumb said:
Yea, no evidence what so ever. Not the marks all over Z's face, not the blunt force trauma on the back of his head. Lets also not forget that Z didn't have any marks on hands, which would need to be present for someone to throw the first punch, I've been in many many fights, and every single time I have at least some swollen knuckles at the very least.
Click to expand...


there was no blunt force trauma, you are making that up. you are an idiot. zimmerman had a tiny scratch with ZERO bruising. this is a fact, dipshit.

martin had no swollen knuckles either. he was right handed, and had the smallest of marks on his left ring finger. nothing consistent with the "25 - 35 punches" that zimm says happened.

why do you ignore the facts?


SirGreenThumb said:
Now lets draw our focus to the your last sentence where YOU are the one who brings up color, when I specifically said human decency. Seems to me like you are the one focused on skin color, I however was focused on human decency.
Click to expand...

i bring up the fact that you assume that the smaller black kid who ran away attacked the larger guy who followed because only a racist would make that assumption. and you seem uber-focused on race, your posts are littered with references to race.






SirGreenThumb said:
Only you seem to keep looking at that comment as being racially charged. Only racists are looking at that comment as being toward the color of someones skin, and you keep repeating it so, yea there you go. All his earlier calls show is that he was doing his part as the neighborhood watch leader and reporting ANY suspicious activity. He was told to do it, and he did. Not to mention the burglary report showed why he called about certain individuals.
Click to expand...

fucking punks. those assholes always get away.

there i said them again. now show me where i assign racial motivation to them. go right ahead and spell it out.

i said they show ill will, not racial motivation.

there you go, wearing your race-colored glasses again. but you are totally not a racist, right?

:lol:

right.

:roll:






SirGreenThumb said:
I wouldn't be surprised if it was restricted from being into evidence, just like how it was restricted to be entered in about what kind of person TM really was, but thankfully his friend demonstrated that for us. Also, it is irrelevant if his nose was broken or not, he has the marks, TM only had a bullet hole. (Self defense)
Click to expand...

now i know you are fucking dumb.

zimm's "injuries" are in evidence, they were already brought up in opening statements.

a tiny scratch and a bloody, but not broken, nose.

but good job on bringing up the smear campaign against martin that was proven to be false, idiot.

no racist would ever keep harping on that after it's been disproven.

idiot.








SirGreenThumb said:
So after I looked it up, I found out that you are using "full wrist control" in order to twist this to your own liking. He managed to grab TM wrists during the struggle so he couldn't grab his gun or maybe to try and get him to stop hitting him. You don't know whether or not TM tried to grab the gun so don't try to pretend you do.
Click to expand...

i am using full wrist control because that is what zimm said in the interrogation. he was able to exercise full wrist control at will.

don't blame your ignorance on me for being informed. own your stupidity and racism.

no DNA from martin on the gun or holster, by the way. and you can hear zimm cock the gun in the call to dispatch.



SirGreenThumb said:
And now we come to the part where you capitalized ABORT. This shows me you are completely butt hurt now and it makes me smile. :grin:
That little thing about abortion doesn't bother me anymore so you waste your time every time you attempt it, and it just shows me how butt hurt you get when you do it and I love it. So thank you for that.
Click to expand...

i'm just glad that you spared this world more versions of yourself and turned it into medical waste instead, all while voting for the guy who would get rid of abortion.

very consistent on your part, nothing hypocritical there.

SirGreenThumb said:
And finally we come to this part. My quote simply shows what you and other people trying to turn this into race seem to think simply because he called about suspicious black males, even though I gave the burglary report showing no other than suspicious black males burglarizing the neighborhood, and yet you try and call me racist for it. I love how ignorant you are. You are like the smartest kid with down syndrome.
Click to expand...

you brought race heavily into your post at the end for no other reason than to justify your own subtle racism preemptively.

don't blame me for being smarter than you and reading between the lines.

i've seen pictures of you, you look like a fucking caveman that dropped out of 7th grade.


SirGreenThumb said:
I also see how you used what that illiterate, uneducated halfwit of a star witness said about Z acting creepy. You have serious issues even attempting to bring anything that girl said into any of this.

And yes, it does appear that your reading comprehension has completely failed you.
Click to expand...

yet she will have far more credibility than the guy you are trying to defend.

not only that, she still probably knows more about the facts of the case than you do.

i have had to correct your delusions over and over again, inform you of basic facts like what zimm's "injuries" were, what zimm said in the interrogations, and so much more.

you have proven time and again that you are not familiar with the facts of the case, and illustrated how important race is to you in this whole scenario.

why would someone who is clearly uninformed like you are take such an interest in a case like this, despite being head-in-the-sand when it comes to basic facts?

i bet it has nothing to do with your shiny skin head :lol:

moron.
 
So am i right this Diamonds lady lies several times under oath, deletes incriminating texts, and can't speak or read? Seriously did they see if she was competent enough for this?
 
All in all, a very bad day for the prosecution. The prosecution needs to get it in gear or they are toast.

Is it possible that the jury could acquit on murder 2, but convict on manslaughter?
 
I am beginning to think that the state charged murder 2 knowing that was a bridge too far. It's just a show trial for the state to be able to say, "we tried our best, but this one just got away from us".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top