Zimmerman sues NBC

UncleBuck · Dec 9, 2012

bottom line, this is a publicity stunt for zimmerman. he is only trying to gain sympathy and funds. he has never showed an ounce of remorse for what happened, he has only told 7 different stories about what happened, arranged for his wife to lie to the judge, watched his wife lie to the judge, and play victim.

he's not exactly doing himself any favors, and yet some people here would suck his cock and swallow the load if he asked politely.

UncleBuck · Dec 9, 2012

Carthoris · Dec 9, 2012

Did the company Fox was lying about try to sue them? This would be a precedence. The other was a for wrongful employment.

If Martin was white, no one would care. If he was a neonazi youth instead of a thieving ghetto thug, UncleFuck would dance and laugh and say how good it was he was dead.

Samwell Seed Well · Dec 9, 2012

redivider said:
what will be tested is whether or not you can start a confrontation, knowing you are armed, then decide to shoot somebody when that person confronts you back....

very well put, people who think Z's actions were warranted are either racists or pussies so afraid of the world around them that they are neurotic to the point of manic fear

Samwell Seed Well · Dec 9, 2012

Carthoris said:
Did the company Fox was lying about try to sue them? This would be a precedence. The other was a for wrongful employment.

If Martin was white, no one would care. If he was a neonazi youth instead of a thieving ghetto thug, UncleFuck would dance and laugh and say how good it was he was dead.

only bigots like yourself are not missed when ever they go back to there hateful lives and leave the rest of us coexisters alone

Canna Sylvan · Dec 9, 2012

Samwell Seed Well said:
only bigots like yourself are not missed when ever they go back to there hateful lives and leave the rest of us coexisters alone

The truth hurts?

althor · Dec 9, 2012

This Zimmerman idiot built himself up to be some kind of badass tough guy all in his head.
He goes out and picks a fight with a CHILD. That CHILD beats his ass, so the pussy bitch pulls out a gun and shoots the CHILD he starts a fight with.
Zimmerman should spend his life sitting in a jail cell, anyone who sees otherwise has some kind of flaw in their logics.

Canna Sylvan · Dec 9, 2012

PeyoteReligion said:
Omitting certain parts of anything is not lying at all. Misleading yes, but lying, not even close.

Jesus says in the Bible, "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth." But then says a bunch of hypocritical hippy shit. Therefore that makes them Jesus cock suckers full of it.

NoDrama · Dec 9, 2012

Samwell Seed Well said:
only bigots like yourself are not missed when ever they go back to there hateful lives and leave the rest of us coexisters alone

Wow, I think you used like 3 wrong words, a preposition with no subject, 2 misspellings, and 3 missed commas. Oh Oh and a Hyphen.

Let me guess? High School graduate?

desert dude · Dec 9, 2012

PeyoteReligion said:
Omitting certain parts of anything is not lying at all. Misleading yes, but lying, not even close.

Since you have posted 3173 times on RIU, I am going to guess that you have probably used most of the common words in the English language. Using your logic, I can cobble together any quote from you that I care to create and simply "omit" the words that stand in the way of my nefarious mission. Is that OK with you? Is that simply "misleading"?

PeyoteReligion said, "I sucked Unclebuck's dick last night and he blew a huge load! I almost choked, but it was creamy and good. Buck said it was an uncommonly large load of jizz because he had not been laid in a while. He also said I swallowed pretty good for a racist teabagger, which made me smile." As far as I know, that quote is a lie. Would you call that just a bit misleading, or a lie?

If I took it a step further and created a quote that got you indicted for conspiracy to distribute marijuana across state lines, would that be OK?

How 'bout I find some of your family videos and edit them to bolster my accusation that you are a federal criminal, is that OK with you?

cannabineer · Dec 9, 2012

Canna Sylvan said:
Jesus says in the Bible, "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth." But then says a bunch of hypocritical hippy shit. Therefore that makes them Jesus cock suckers full of it.

Classic spin right here. You insinuate that Jesus said that as one of his teachings. Here's some context that turns that on its head. Matthew, chapter 5. cn

[SUP]38 [/SUP]“You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’[SUP][a][/SUP] [SUP]39 [/SUP]But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also.

nontheist · Dec 9, 2012

NoDrama said:
Wow, I think you used like 3 wrong words, a preposition with no subject, 2 misspellings, and 3 missed commas. Oh Oh and a Hyphen.

Let me guess? High School graduate?

I liked how he expressed bigotry toward bigots in someway trying to express how bad bigots are. Congratulation Samwell you went full retard.

desert dude · Dec 9, 2012

1. NBC's statement was false.
2. Zimmerman was charged with murder 2, and investigated for hate crimes by the FBI. This all happened AFTER Florida's state attorney's office had declined to charge him with a crime. Certainly, NBC's hit job was instrumental in creating the hysteria that arose over the whole incident, and this caused the political pressure on Florida's criminal justice system to "do something".
3. Not only did NBC fail to do adequate research about the truthfulness of the audio recording they ran multiple times, they actively edited the audio recording of the call to intentionally characterize Z as a racist.NBC needs to get out the check book and settle out of court on this.

How to prove libel

There are several ways a person must go about proving that libel has taken place. For example, in the United States, first, the person must prove that the statement was false. Second, the person must prove that the statement caused harm. Third, the person must prove that the statement was made without adequate research into the truthfulness of the statement. These steps are for an ordinary citizen. For a celebrity or a public official, the person must prove the first three steps and that the statement was made with the intent to do harm or with reckless disregard for the truth.[SUP][citation needed][/SUP] Usually specifically referred to as "proving malice".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation

Red1966 · Dec 9, 2012

UncleBuck said:
bottom line, this is a publicity stunt for zimmerman. he is only trying to gain sympathy and funds. he has never showed an ounce of remorse for what happened, he has only told 7 different stories about what happened, arranged for his wife to lie to the judge, watched his wife lie to the judge, and play victim. he's not exactly doing himself any favors, and yet some people here would suck his cock and swallow the load if he asked politely.

Are you volunteering?

Red1966 · Dec 9, 2012

Samwell Seed Well said:
only bigots like yourself are not missed when ever they go back to there hateful lives and leave the rest of us coexisters alone

coexisters? Get real, you are as about as intolerant as a person can get. Your last three posts were nothing but slurs against anyone who might disagree with you. Coexister indeed!

Red1966 · Dec 9, 2012

althor said:
This Zimmerman idiot built himself up to be some kind of badass tough guy all in his head. He goes out and picks a fight with a CHILD. That CHILD beats his ass, so the pussy bitch pulls out a gun and shoots the CHILD he starts a fight with. Zimmerman should spend his life sitting in a jail cell, anyone who sees otherwise has some kind of flaw in their logics.

Funny, I see all your assumptions as "flawed". You pretend you know Zimmerman's thoughts. You don't. Your "CHILD" was 17 and bigger than Zimmerman. Zimmerman may have been out of line, but he didn't start the fight. There is no such word as "logics".

cannabineer · Dec 9, 2012

Red1966 said:
Funny, I see all your assumptions as "flawed". You pretend you know Zimmerman's thoughts. You don't. Your "CHILD" was 17 and bigger than Zimmerman. Zimmerman may have been out of line, but he didn't start the fight. There is no such word as "logics".

Taller but not bigger. Zimm weighed between 35 and 50 pounds more, allowing for the ranges of weights quoted. cn

Carthoris · Dec 9, 2012

Samwell Seed Well said:
only bigots like yourself are not missed when ever they go back to there hateful lives and leave the rest of us coexisters alone

My entire philosophy is leaving people alone. Socialism is the exact opposite.

Red1966 · Dec 9, 2012

cannabineer said:
Taller but not bigger. Zimm weighed between 35 and 50 pounds more, allowing for the ranges of weights quoted. cn

OK, taller, and in better shape. Satisfied?

cannabineer · Dec 9, 2012

Red1966 said:
OK, taller, and in better shape. Satisfied?

I have no good info that Martin was in better shape. cn

Zimmerman sues NBC

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Ursus marijanus

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Attachments

Ursus marijanus

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Ursus marijanus

Similar threads