kelly4
Well-Known Member
I stopped at "speed is irrelevant".All of this shit is situational.. we can all change the scenarios and weapons to make one weapon look "better", more fatal, more catastrophic, more destructive whatever the argument may be.
Evaluating guns at Sandy hook vs. a "F350 with lift, mudders, plow, and a suicidal driver on a marathon course would kill more people?" is absurd. Two very different "venues". Take that truck and put it in a parking lot at Sandy Hook while students are in classrooms (same situation that the shooting took place in), and your argument would fail miserably.
"If the truck is doing 50 mph from behind... How much noise does it make? How much time would it take for everyone to realize what's going on?" - Speed is irrelevant for one. The screams of the first person would undeniably provide warning to other people in harm's way much quicker than the sound of the vehicle. Not to mention a person with a gun can pick targets from front of a crowd to the back or anyone in between on spilt seconds. Meaning scrambling out of the way is just a nuisance for a shooter, not a killing spree stopper..
"How many shots would have to be fired to kill me?" - That's a stupid question but I'll answer it anyway - one.
Is the seed of a bullet relevant? What if I throw one at you?