Capitalism loses

Which economic policy for the 21st century will win out

  • Total voters
    15
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
His post is accurate. Kynes hasn't actually read any of the works he criticizes and it's apparent to anyone who has. It's like fundamentalist who don't accept the theory of evolution, they ask questions like "where's the missing link?" and "if evolution were true, why are there still apes?". Someone who has read Darwin's work doesn't ask those questions because the answers are found inside the works themselves. Those that have read Darwin's work know this.. It shines a spotlight on ignorance. It's a "wait, what?" moment..

His posted butchering of Keynesian economics shows that

His posted butchering of communism, socialism, capitalism, anthropogenic climate change and all the way down to cars shows that..

If he spent half the time learning about these things rather than reading right wing blogs he already agrees with only to confirm his bias, he wouldn't post such butcherings online for people like abandon, buck, chesus and me to make fun of

He's pretty clearly a dude who has been caught up in the context of his generation and hasn't moved past it

There are a handful of other members who share similar characteristics. It's exacerbated by their anger and emotion, enough to the point I don't even think half of them actually smoke weed, they just joined RIU to bitch about politics with people they truly hate. Test it yourself, compare each others posts. Buck spits venom in similar fashion, but it's easy to see it's just a game with him, others, like Kynes and Muyloco actually have real animosity towards those they disagree with politically and it's very clear to read between the lines in their posts to see it. I give credit to NoDrama and ginwilly as it's also clear they don't. Some people take this place way too seriously, and I'm beginning to think you do as well.

I can't wait to skim past Kynes' book report about this post, I'm sure it'll be entertaining
Click to expand...
You accuse someone of not reading books he claims he has read and then continue to repeat it until you hope other people believe it is true.

Kynes says he read what he said and some internet twerp decides he didnt. Who am I supposed to believe?

I am pretty sure you didnt read any of those works because honestly you dont come across as smart enough to know which way to hold a book much less how to read, comprehend, summarize and form opinions from the body of work.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
Kynes says he read what he said and some internet twerp decides he didnt. Who am I supposed to believe?
Click to expand...
whoever provides better evidence.

pada and abandon have presented evidence that kynes has either not read at all or quote mined marx. kynes has offered nothing to disprove them, just more evidence that he has not read marx.

are you aware of how to go about evaluating evidence for competing claims?
 
GreatwhiteNorth

GreatwhiteNorth

Global Moderator
Staff member
Go the source of your frustration instead of venting shotgun style.
You may actually get some results if you interacted directly with whom ever you're referring to.

And PM's preferably.
Just my .02
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
You bitch and complain til the end of the earth, it doesn't matter what anyone says. You feel that if you bitch long enough and loud enough, you win. I'm afraid to inform you, that's not the case in legitimate dialogue.
Click to expand...
That's right. You can always tell who the winner is by how many times they use the word "science" while they clearly have no idea what the word means. Science, science, science, science, science, science, science, science, science, science, science, science, science, science, science, science, science, science, science, science, science. 21 times. I win!!!
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
GreatwhiteNorth said:
Go the source of your frustration instead of venting shotgun style.
You may actually get some results if you interacted directly with whom ever you're referring to.

And PM's preferably.
Just my .02
Click to expand...
if i knew who put my shit on the Passive Aggressive User Discouragement bullshit, i would certainly have some choice words for them.

unfortunately whoever did it sent no message, made no statements regarding whether or no i was being put on such a list, nor why such a course of action might have been warranted

the site functions normally, right up till i log in, then it falls apart.
i get constant Random Errors (503 errors, long transaction times, failed transaction, random logouts, random redirects to the front page, etc.) and slow loads, starting late last week.

the only rational explanation is that i have been put on the Passive Aggressive User Discouragement List.

had the individual responsible taken ownership of their actions, then the matter could be addressed like grownups (or at least one grownup talking to a petulant child) but that option is not open, since the reponsible party prefers to remain anonymous, and hide his (or her) reasons for this action.

just getting to the point where i could type this message took 7 minutes, and will most likely require 3-5 attempts to post.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
if i knew who put my shit on the Passive Aggressive User Discouragement bullshit, i would certainly have some choice words for them.

unfortunately whoever did it sent no message, made no statements regarding whether or no i was being put on such a list, nor why such a course of action might have been warranted

the site functions normally, right up till i log in, then it falls apart.
i get constant Random Errors (503 errors, long transaction times, failed transaction, random logouts, random redirects to the front page, etc.) and slow loads, starting late last week.

the only rational explanation is that i have been put on the Passive Aggressive User Discouragement List.

had the individual responsible taken ownership of their actions, then the matter could be addressed like grownups (or at least one grownup talking to a petulant child) but that option is not open, since the reponsible party prefers to remain anonymous, and hide his (or her) reasons for this action.

just getting to the point where i could type this message took 7 minutes, and will most likely require 3-5 attempts to post.
Click to expand...
maybe it was because you spent the better part of last week demonizing blacks?
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
maybe it was because you spent the better part of last week demonizing blacks?
Click to expand...
Classic Schmoesby!

nothin substantive to say?
wanna make a baseless charge of Racism anyway?
cant come up with something fresh?

time for another Buckpost!




thats the worst part of the Passive Aggressive User Discouragement List.

i have to see your nonsense again.
 
G

god1

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
maybe it was because you spent the better part of last week demonizing blacks?
Click to expand...

Whaaaat ...... wait a minute; let's assume he did, what difference does it make?

You demonize people all the time?

It's the bias baby, it's the bias ....

But then I don't have to remind you, do I?
 
sheskunk

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
why are you always so miserable?

you're messing with the feng shui here.

and blocking the flow.
Click to expand...

Consider me a dose of reality.

Tupac and Biggie are a perfect example of how rap music creates violence. Nothing about that makes me a miserable person. I am simply presenting facts.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
god1 said:
Whaaaat ...... wait a minute; let's assume he did, what difference does it make?

You demonize people all the time?

It's the bias baby, it's the bias ....

But then I don't have to remind you, do I?
Click to expand...
keep crying, i'll keep laughing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top