POLL: gay people are more popular than evangelical christians

[UncleBuck]

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/wa...oll-gay-people-more-popular-than-evangelicals

53 percent of respondents held a favorable view of gay people, while 42 percent held a favorable view of evangelical Christians. Meanwhile, 18 percent of the likely voters surveyed held an unfavorable view of gay people, while 28 percent held a negative view of evangelical Christians.


LOfuckingL.

the paradigm is shifting.

 

[hydroMD]

Makes sense.... the most radical/ flamboyant gays dont have the negative impact on the group as a whole as say Westboro Baptist does on religion.

Id argue the majority of people casting such a bad light on religion arent actually evangelical. Nobody that's completely devout judges any on for anything per the bible, as supposedly its gods job as I understand it.

How can ya hate a person for the way they love?
-brother Ali

 

[schuylaar]

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/wa...oll-gay-people-more-popular-than-evangelicals

53 percent of respondents held a favorable view of gay people, while 42 percent held a favorable view of evangelical Christians. Meanwhile, 18 percent of the likely voters surveyed held an unfavorable view of gay people, while 28 percent held a negative view of evangelical Christians.


LOfuckingL.

the paradigm is shifting.

as predicted.

 

[schuylaar]

Makes sense.... the most radical/ flamboyant gays dont have the negative impact on the group as a whole as say Westboro Baptist does on religion.

Id argue the majority of people casting such a bad light on religion arent actually evangelical. Nobody that's completely devout judges any on for anything per the bible, as supposedly its gods job as I understand it.

How can ya hate a person for the way they love?
-brother Ali

..or for living.

 

[hydroMD]

..or for living.

Tell that to the guy wearing a human skin suit right now

 

[schuylaar]

Tell that to the guy wearing a human skin suit right now

i don't get it.

 

[King Arthur]

At least it is proof that beliefs can change

 

[hydroMD]

i don't get it.

As In I hate that guy

 

[Milovan]

.


.

 

[desert dude]

Fire up the ovens, it's time to make some crispy Christys.

 

[UncleBuck]

Fire up the ovens, it's time to make some crispy Christys.

you're a wite supremacist and quite possibly one of the least popular members of this entire site.

go wish federal prison on more people as you work for the federal government and rejoice when they get it.

 

[King Arthur]

Funny story, I just had a couple of lesbians staying at my guest house and they left behind a little friend.... well when I say little I mean like 3 times the size of a real mans cock LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

Gave me a good chuckle, was wondering if they were ever going to ask for it back and if they don't I might just take it to goodwill and donate it.

Oh point of my story is that people are people lol.

 

[Rob Roy]

Another persons freedom to control their own person and property shouldn't be changed by the whims of a poll.

 

[UncleBuck]

Another persons freedom to control their own person and property shouldn't be changed by the whims of a poll.

has anyone ever been forced to open a public store rather than a private one?

 

[Rob Roy]

has anyone ever been forced to open a public store rather than a private one?

Yes, people that had stores prior to the usurpation of their private property right in 1964 had their stores changed, from one kind of property to another, by government force.

I win again!!!!

 

[UncleBuck]

Yes, people that had stores prior to the usurpation of their private property right in 1964 had their stores changed, from one kind of property to another, by government force.

I win again!!!!

so they were not allowed to call their stores private instead of public? can you show me where in the civil rights law it forced them to call their stores public instead of private?

 

[Rob Roy]

so they were not allowed to call their stores private instead of public? can you show me where in the civil rights law it forced them to call their stores public instead of private?

They had already been private. Having to change them to some other government invented pseudo property status is evidence of the force. The initial change was forced on them and then in order to comply they would have been forced to do something else.


Hint- When force is used or threatened....it's presence is self evident. It's like a turd in punch bowl, its clearly a turd and not an attractive garnish, well for most of us anyway.

 

[UncleBuck]

They had already been private.

so they were not allowed to call their stores private instead of public? can you show me where in the civil rights law it forced them to call their stores public instead of private?

 

[Rob Roy]

so they were not allowed to call their stores private instead of public? can you show me where in the civil rights law it forced them to call their stores public instead of private?

So they were grandfathered in or would they be forced to do something to designate the new status of their property that a non owner had forced upon them?

Also, I'm a little tired tonight sweetheart and can't be up all night doing the absurd dance with you. I have cocks to slaughter in the morning.

 

[mr sunshine]

So they were grandfathered in or would they be forced to do something to designate the new status of their property that a non owner had forced upon them?

Also, I'm a little tired tonight sweetheart and can't be up all night doing the absurd dance with you. I have cocks to slaughter in the morning.

How many cocks?