White nationalists sick of being called racist.

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
I see. It's like discrimination. It must be terrible to be a victim of discriminatory cake baking.

You seem to minimize the use of force when the end result meets your approval. That kind of rationalization can lead to unintended consequences.

If everyone did that rather than interacting on a consensual basis, the varying things people approve of insist that there will be continual disagreements. That doesn't seem like a worthy method if it doesn't end in mutual agreement.

When people don't agree, the best thing is not to interact, as peace is then maintained.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
You seem to minimize the use of force when the end result meets your approval.
Tldr.

Usually when your opening statement is retarded it is an indication of the rest of the content of your post. This, together with the fact that you're the source leaves me sure that there is nothing of value in the rest of your post.

Hopefully this will help you make your opinions seem almost relevant.

Inb4 pedophilia is described as consensual.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Tldr.

Usually when your opening statement is retarded it is an indication of the rest of the content of your post. This, together with the fact that you're the source leaves me sure that there is nothing of value in the rest of your post.

Hopefully this will help you make your opinions seem almost relevant.

Usually when a person replies to something with his main point being a diversion or an insult rather than a refutation, he cannot offer a decent refutation and his opinion has been exposed as contradictory or nonsensical.

You fit that description.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Usually when a person replies to something with his main point being a diversion or an insult rather than a refutation, he cannot offer a decent refutation and his opinion has been exposed as contradictory or nonsensical.

You fit that description.
I disagree. My reasons are fourfold.

First, your post opened with your typical bullshit and wasn't even interesting.

Secondly, you're philosophy is a contradictory pile of crap which means everything you have to say is ridiculous.

Thirdly, while you would certainly attempt to come off as nonpartisan, you're one of the targets of the thread.

Last but not least, your disagreement with the point conveyed in the thread is indicated by your desire to post in it.

Quite ironic that instead of arguing against the thread title, such as by saying that there are no racist members or something to that effect, you instead tried to create a diversion. Then you claim I'm creating a diversion, as if I were trying to derail my own thread.

You must really need attention, you have been following me from thread to thread for a while now.

Inb4 my Veteran's disability check gets compared to rape.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
I disagree. My reasons are fourfold.

First, your post opened with your typical bullshit and wasn't even interesting.

Secondly, you're philosophy is a contradictory pile of crap which means everything you have to say is ridiculous.

Thirdly, while you would certainly attempt to come off as nonpartisan, you're one of the targets of the thread.

Last but not least, your disagreement with the point conveyed in the thread is indicated by your desire to post in it.

Quite ironic that instead of arguing against the thread title, such as by saying that there are no racist members or something to that effect, you instead tried to create a diversion. Then you claim I'm creating a diversion, as if I were trying to derail my own thread.

You must really need attention, you have been following me from thread to thread for a while now.

Inb4 my Veteran's disability check gets compared to rape.

Your first line is subjective, you never refuted any of it either.


This is an interesting quote that offers a refutation of your second line.

Bakunin:

They [Marx et al.] assert that a dictatorship – theirs, of course, can create liberty for the people. We assert that no dictatorship can have any other goals than the perpetuation of itself, and that it is capable only of creating and cultivating slavery in the people which submits to it. Freedom can only be created by freedom…

Your third statement is funny.

Your fourth one could be valid. I like to expose your hypocrisy. Plus I'm drinking coffee and smoking weed.

Inb4 I give you shit about your government check.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Rofl at dumb ass ancap quoting Bakunin. So priceless. Yet again you quote a collectivist anarchist (libertarian socialist) but you just had to pick the antisemitic one.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Rofl at dumb ass ancap quoting Bakunin. So priceless. Yet again you quote a collectivist anarchist (libertarian socialist) but you just had to pick the antisemitic one.
Quoting a person is not an endorsement of everything they say is it? It could be an endorsement or recognition of a particular
thing that was said though.

You seem a little more irritable than usual today. Has your coercive and monopolistic government failed to deliver you a hot breakfast and a cup of coffee, this morning, "anarchist" ?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Usually when a person replies to something with his main point being a diversion or an insult rather than a refutation, he cannot offer a decent refutation and his opinion has been exposed as contradictory or nonsensical.

You fit that description.
what is the most peaceful way to kick someone out of a place of business because of their skin color?
 

see4

Well-Known Member
I disagree. My reasons are fourfold.

First, your post opened with your typical bullshit and wasn't even interesting.

Secondly, you're philosophy is a contradictory pile of crap which means everything you have to say is ridiculous.

Thirdly, while you would certainly attempt to come off as nonpartisan, you're one of the targets of the thread.

Last but not least, your disagreement with the point conveyed in the thread is indicated by your desire to post in it.

Quite ironic that instead of arguing against the thread title, such as by saying that there are no racist members or something to that effect, you instead tried to create a diversion. Then you claim I'm creating a diversion, as if I were trying to derail my own thread.

You must really need attention, you have been following me from thread to thread for a while now.

Inb4 my Veteran's disability check gets compared to rape.





 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Reverse racism is... racism.

Inverted racism is... racism.

One star. Simple trolling. It's middle of the month so the welfare ran out and OP has time on his hands.
 
Top