invents printed gun, fucks 16 year old, flees to thailand......

[The Yorkshireman]

He's up on charges in the state where he fucked the 16 YO. Do the crime, do the time. What's legal or illegal in other states is irrelevant.
If he uses the "I didn't know she was 16" line, I'll laugh. When was a law ever written like this: "Fucking kids is illegal unless you don't know their age."
Good god, what a sniveling excuse.
Aren't your kind always talking about personal responsibility? Of course your kind only mean that when convenient, I guess.

If you would have read my earlier posts you would have seen me say......

"Cody Wilson met the girl via a sugar baby site and she clearly lied to him about her age.
She is 16 and the age of consent in Texas is 17, so she's less than a year younger than the age of consent in the state that they had sex.
It's not like he's a fucking peado, he was clearly duped.

He was arrested and faces charges of Statutory Rape because the girl is under age, although there are no repercussions for the sugar baby website for failing to vet the girl and check her age to avoid exactly this kind of situation in the first place.
The girl deliberately joined a sugar baby site and then went to the police after she had consensual sex with Cody Wilson, despite her being within the age of consent in most of the USA.
Why the fuck would the girl intentionally join the site, have consensual sex with Cody and then go to the police to file a sexual assault claim based entirely on the fact that she was coincidentally under age in the state he lives in without having an ulterior motive?
It makes no sense at all."

And also.....

"When you are a member of a website that basically sells prostitution (as in a sugar baby site) you would assume that the women are of legal age and that the website has done it's due diligence in vetting and confirming the women's age, despite this what do you do when you are lied to by said female and she looks and says she's (for example) 18, 19 or 20?

What's stopping girls of 12, 13, 14 and 15 joining the website and pretending they are 16, 17 and 18 if they look it?
Absolutely nothing, that's what.

Do you ID every female you intend to have sex with in case you are being duped and she's under age? No, I fucking thought not.
But I'll admit that he could have done more to protect himself from being duped."

But no obviously you didn't, you just jumped in with both feet judging me on a whim without assessing the points rationally.

And what is "your kind" supposed to mean?
You know fuck all about me unless you ask and I tell you.
Don't be so arrogant as to assume you know me and what I stand for.

 

[The Yorkshireman]

Everybody in a little bubble circle jerking each other yet when the actual facts of the situation are laid out not one person has a rational and logical answer to any of them.

.............................

 

[Roger A. Shrubber]

you're a fucking dirtbag defending another dirtbag.....are you really donald trump? is this what you do when you aren't tweeting in defense of your women abusing friends?

 

[Fogdog]

If you would have read my earlier posts you would have seen me say......

"Cody Wilson met the girl via a sugar baby site and she clearly lied to him about her age.
She is 16 and the age of consent in Texas is 17, so she's less than a year younger than the age of consent in the state that they had sex.
It's not like he's a fucking peado, he was clearly duped.

He was arrested and faces charges of Statutory Rape because the girl is under age, although there are no repercussions for the sugar baby website for failing to vet the girl and check her age to avoid exactly this kind of situation in the first place.
The girl deliberately joined a sugar baby site and then went to the police after she had consensual sex with Cody Wilson, despite her being within the age of consent in most of the USA.
Why the fuck would the girl intentionally join the site, have consensual sex with Cody and then go to the police to file a sexual assault claim based entirely on the fact that she was coincidentally under age in the state he lives in without having an ulterior motive?
It makes no sense at all."

And also.....

"When you are a member of a website that basically sells prostitution (as in a sugar baby site) you would assume that the women are of legal age and that the website has done it's due diligence in vetting and confirming the women's age, despite this what do you do when you are lied to by said female and she looks and says she's (for example) 18, 19 or 20?

What's stopping girls of 12, 13, 14 and 15 joining the website and pretending they are 16, 17 and 18 if they look it?
Absolutely nothing, that's what.

Do you ID every female you intend to have sex with in case you are being duped and she's under age? No, I fucking thought not.
But I'll admit that he could have done more to protect himself from being duped."

But no obviously you didn't, you just jumped in with both feet judging me on a whim without assessing the points rationally.

And what is "your kind" supposed to mean?
You know fuck all about me unless you ask and I tell you.
Don't be so arrogant as to assume you know me and what I stand for.

I don't know if you realize it but a 30 year old man put his dick into a 16 year old girl and that's illegal in Texas.

Everything you said is unimportant to what the gun nut did.

Your kind just want what you want. I get it. But the law in Texas is what it is so suck it.

 

[The Yorkshireman]

you're a fucking dirtbag defending another dirtbag.....are you really donald trump? is this what you do when you aren't tweeting in defense of your women abusing friends?

Listen Mr "he got caught in Thailand for fiddling 15 year olds."
When actually he was in Taiwan and was arrested because the US cancelled his passport.

I'm not defending anybody.
I simply stated my opinion based on the actual facts of the situation.

When you have a rational and logical answer to my points then fair enough, but you've shown yourself to be pig ignorant so far.

 

[The Yorkshireman]

I don't know if you realize it but a 30 year old man put his dick into a 16 year old girl and that's illegal in Texas.
Everything you said is unimportant to what the gun nut did.
Your kind just want what you want. I get it. But the law in Texas is what it is so suck it.

Yes, I'm not saying it isn't and I'm not defending him for doing it.

I'm saying it most probably wasn't intentional and he was most probably duped and set up given the facts of the situation.
There's a term called 'extenuating circumstances', you should look it up.

And everything I said is very important to what "the gun nut" did, which is why I made the points I did.

So for example what if she had a fake ID like a drivers license that says she was 18?
Is he still guilty of being a child rapist despite him doing all he could to verify her age, yet was lied to and is a victim of fraud by deception?
What about a thought out response to the other example situations I gave?

But no, logical discourse doesn't come into it does it?
Because that would force you to think rationally for yourself.
Your kind just want what they want, I get it.

You show your hand and the mentality you have by calling him "the gun nut".
He's for guns and you're obviously not, the accusation is he fucked an underage girl and that alone is enough to condemn the guy in your eyes.
No due process, no nothing.

I see.

 

[Fogdog]

Yes, I'm not saying it isn't and I'm not defending him for doing it.

I'm saying it most probably wasn't intentional and he was most probably duped and set up given the facts of the situation.
There's a term called 'extenuating circumstances', you should look it up.

And everything I said is very important to what "the gun nut" did, which is why I made the points I did.

So for example what if she had a fake ID like a drivers license that says she was 18?
Is he still guilty of being a child rapist despite him doing all he could to verify her age, yet was lied to and is a victim of fraud by deception?
What about a thought out response to the other example situations I gave?

But no, logical discourse doesn't come into it does it?
Because that would force you to think rationally for yourself.
Your kind just want what they want, I get it.

You show your hand and the mentality you have by calling him "the gun nut".
He's for guns and you're obviously not, the accusation is he fucked an underage girl and that alone is enough to condemn the guy in your eyes.
No due process, no nothing.

I see.

Your opinion is irrelevant and the same old whiney entitled white male crap that brought us the NRA and Trump along with mass shootings at schools. He was 30 YO, he gave money to a girl who was under age when he fucked her. Your story requires a ridiculous conspiracy theory, which is a weakness of your kind. I'm glad you picked a topic where you are clearly wrong when you defend one of your own.

 

[The Yorkshireman]

 

[Sir Napsalot]

No you didn't.
You said you were judging his character based on him being outspoken in his videos.

Right, it's totally about my disdain for outspokenness

 

[Fogdog]

View attachment 4205353

Exactly. The facts are he fucked girl who whas under age. All of your emotional opinions are based upon no facts or evidence.

I'm glad you are beginning to understand but you probably aren't.

 

[Fogdog]

Everybody in a little bubble circle jerking each other yet when the actual facts of the situation are laid out not one person has a rational and logical answer to any of them.

.............................

gun nut

trump supporter

 

[The Yorkshireman]

Right, it's totally about my disdain for outspokenness

The conversation went.......

I personally think he's an asshole

What facts do you base your opinion on?

The fact that I'm a good judge of character

Oh really, you know Cody Wilson personally do you?

Don't need to

He's quite forthright on video

So without you giving an objective example of why you think he's an arsehole nobody knows what the fuck you mean.

 

[Fogdog]

The conversation went.......











So without you giving an objective example of why you think he's an arsehole nobody knows what the fuck you mean.

Your unjustified opinion is ridiculous and becomes more so when you try to explain it.

"bbbbut other states it's legal"

"bbuut I believe he was set up"

"Oh and my made up scenario -- you must take it seriously." LOL

Your kind are so much in a "belief bubble".

 

[Sir Napsalot]

So without you giving an objective example of why you think he's an arsehole nobody knows what the fuck you mean.

Maybe everybody knows what I mean but you

 

[Fogdog]

Maybe everybody knows what I mean but you

@The Yorkshireman is defending a child sex offender not because he thinks the man didn't do it but because the offender is a gun nut. How sick is that.

 

[The Yorkshireman]

Your opinion is irrelevant and the same old whiney entitled white male crap that brought us the NRA and Trump along with mass shootings at schools. He was 30 YO, he gave money to a girl who was under age when he fucked her. Your story requires a ridiculous conspiracy theory, which is a weakness of your kind. I'm glad you picked a topic where you are clearly wrong when you defend one of your own.

My opinion is as irrelevant as yours is.

1) "the same old whiney entitled white male crap that brought us the NRA and Trump along with mass shootings at schools."

I'm not whining about anything, I gave my opinion based on the facts.
You're the one who's whining, while still not addressing the points.
You assume I'm white, male AND American it seems! Based on what? Your fucking emotions!
Ad Hominem much!

You do know the NRA was founded 146 years ago in 1871 right? lol
You do know that 46% of women voted for Trump right?
You do know that most school shootings in the USA have been committed by people on psychiatric drugs right?
(Evidence....)
https://www.cchrint.org/school-shooters/


2) "He was 30 YO, he gave money to a girl who was under age when he fucked her."

You keep banging on about he gave money to a 16 year old when he fucked her yet still refuse to address the possibility that he was lied to.
Why she was on a sugar baby website offering sex for cash and prizes in the first place.
Maybe he asked her age during the conversations on the website and she showed him a fake ID, it's quite plausible and you have no fucking idea.
But you're not willing to entertain it because it doesn't fit your personal agenda.


"Your story requires a ridiculous conspiracy theory, which is a weakness of your kind."

It's not ridiculous at all, it's quite simple and very plausible.
Again with the "your kind" bullshit, you've judged me based on your agenda, I judged you on exactly what you've said.


3) "I'm glad you picked a topic where you are clearly wrong when you defend one of your own."

I'm not fucking wrong, my opinion is exactly that, an opinion, an opinion can't be wrong because it's not a statement of fact.
Given the circumstances and facts of the situation it is highly unlikely that the ALLEGED offense was deliberate.
If so then yes, he deserves what he gets, I never justified it if the situation is black and white/cut and dry but under rational scrutiny it's dodgy situation.
You haven't given it any rational scrutiny at all, you've heard a story and just ran with it because it fits your world view.

My opinion is that he was probably set up in the #metoo style, the reasons for which are based on verifiable facts.
The government has it in for Cody Wilson, that's not a theory.
They tried to fuck him over already and they failed, he sued them and won. They don't want untaxable/untraceable guns to be on the streets in mass amounts but he made it possible and the law is on his side despite what yours or the governments feelings are about it.

And what the fuck is defend one of my own?
I'm not even American and I don't live in America, you're assuming based on your emotions again.

You've got fuck all to say but throw Ad Hominem based on emotion and not any rational thought.

 

[The Yorkshireman]

@The Yorkshireman is defending a child sex offender not because he thinks the man didn't do it but because the offender is a gun nut. How sick is that.

You stupid fuckwit.

I'm not defending any body for any reason.

I said I don't think the guy did it deliberately, I think he was set up like #metoo because the government want his activity's stopped, despite the fact that the law is on his side and they've tried to fuck him over once already and failed.

It's quite simple but you clearly can't grasp it.

 

[The Yorkshireman]

Maybe everybody knows what I mean but you

Yeah maybe everybody can read your mind.

Or maybe you can't give a rationally thought out reason as to why you think the guy is an arsehole.

 

[Fogdog]

My opinion is as irrelevant as yours is.

1) "the same old whiney entitled white male crap that brought us the NRA and Trump along with mass shootings at schools."

I'm not whining about anything, I gave my opinion based on the facts.
You're the one who's whining, while still not addressing the points.
You assume I'm white, male AND American it seems! Based on what? Your fucking emotions!
Ad Hominem much!

You do know the NRA was founded 146 years ago in 1871 right? lol
You do know that 46% of women voted for Trump right?
You do know that most school shootings in the USA have been committed by people on psychiatric drugs right?
(Evidence....)
https://www.cchrint.org/school-shooters/


2) "He was 30 YO, he gave money to a girl who was under age when he fucked her."

You keep banging on about he gave money to a 16 year old when he fucked her yet still refuse to address the possibility that he was lied to.
Why she was on a sugar baby website offering sex for cash and prizes in the first place.
Maybe he asked her age during the conversations on the website and she showed him a fake ID, it's quite plausible and you have no fucking idea.
But you're not willing to entertain it because it doesn't fit your personal agenda.


"Your story requires a ridiculous conspiracy theory, which is a weakness of your kind."

It's not ridiculous at all, it's quite simple and very plausible.
Again with the "your kind" bullshit, you've judged me based on your agenda, I judged you on exactly what you've said.


3) "I'm glad you picked a topic where you are clearly wrong when you defend one of your own."

I'm not fucking wrong, my opinion is exactly that, an opinion, an opinion can't be wrong because it's not a statement of fact.
Given the circumstances and facts of the situation it is highly unlikely that the ALLEGED offense was deliberate.
If so then yes, he deserves what he gets, I never justified it if the situation is black and white/cut and dry but under rational scrutiny it's dodgy situation.
You haven't given it any rational scrutiny at all, you've heard a story and just ran with it because it fits your world view.

My opinion is that he was probably set up in the #metoo style, the reasons for which are based on verifiable facts.
The government has it in for Cody Wilson, that's not a theory.
They tried to fuck him over already and they failed, he sued them and won. They don't want untaxable/untraceable guns to be on the streets in mass amounts but he made it possible and the law is on his side despite what yours or the governments feelings are about it.

And what the fuck is defend one of my own?
I'm not even American and I don't live in America, you're assuming based on your emotions again.

You've got fuck all to say but throw Ad Hominem based on emotion and not any rational thought.

I'm not stating an opinion. I'm stating a fact. The man is charged with sex with a minor under Texas law, where the crime occurred..

Your opinion is based upon a made up story. Therefore you opinion is baseless and only worthy of mocking..

Just in case you want to deny your made up story, I'll repeat exactly what you said:

Yes, I'm not saying it isn't and I'm not defending him for doing it.

I'm saying it most probably wasn't intentional
he was most probably duped and set up given the facts of the situation.
So for example what if she had a fake ID like a drivers license that says she was 18?
Is he still guilty of being a child rapist despite him doing all he could to verify her age, yet was lied to and is a victim of fraud by deception?
What about a thought out response to the other example situations I gave?

Not a word of what you said was fact. It was all just supposition, a nice word to avoid saying it was made up shit.

My thought out response to the "other example situations" is, those aren't facts. The facts are he fucked a girl who was 16 and he was 30. That's against the law in Texas, the state where he did it.

The gun nut is in for a very bad time due to his own actions.

 

[The Yorkshireman]

I'm not stating an opinion. I'm stating a fact. The man is charged with sex with a minor.
Your opinion is based upon a made up story. Therefore you opinion is baseless and only worthy of mocking..

He's been charged, NOT CONVICTED.

No my story is not made up.
Other than my opinion that he was set up and he maybe didn't do it deliberately, everything I've said about the situation and him is verifiable fact.
You haven't even read my original post you disingenuous fool.

What I said was........

I personally think Cody Wilson was set up for pissing the government off.

Here are the facts, make your own mind up but I think it's pretty obvious what happened.

Cody Wilson met the girl via a sugar baby site and she clearly lied to him about her age.
She is 16 and the age of consent in Texas is 17 (the minimum age is 14 with an age differential of 3 years), so she's less than a year younger than the age of consent in the state that they had sex.
It's not like he's a fucking peado, he was clearly duped.

He faces charges of Statutory Rape because the girl is under age, although there are no repercussions for the sugar baby website for failing to vet the girl and check her age to avoid exactly this kind of situation in the first place.
The girl deliberately joined a sugar baby site and then went to the police after she had consensual sex with Cody Wilson, despite her being within the age of consent in most of the USA.
Why the fuck would the girl intentionally join the site, have consensual sex with Cody and then go to the police to file a sexual assault claim based entirely on the fact that she was coincidentally under age in the state he lives in without having an ulterior motive?
It makes no sense at all.

So now we get down to the interesting stuff and the real point of all this......

Cody Wilson inventing 3D printed guns is old news, it's not even relevant any more.
But what is relevant is that Cody Wilson's company Defense Distributed now make and sell desktop CNC machines called the Ghost Gunner for $2,000 that take an aluminium 80% finished AR-10 or AR-15 lower receiver and do all the machining needed to turn that chunk of metal into a 100% finished AR-10/AR-15 lower receiver in a couple of hours, these machines also finish 1911 pistols.
The lower receiver is the only part of the gun considered a weapon and as such is the only part of the gun that has a serial number on it if bought legit (the rest of the parts can be bought off the shelf at Walmart by a child), the serial number is there only for tax purposes.
Having an untraceable weapon is not the problem because making your own gun is perfectly legal, the problem is that Cody Wilson is enabling people to mass produce AR-15 lower receivers and 1911 pistols in their own home, thus depriving the government of the tax money on every one made and the law is entirely on his side.
The governments recent propaganda and fear mongering concerning "ghost guns" is directly because of Cody Wilson, it's not about crazy fuckers shooting up schools with untraceable guns (because like I said making your own gun is legal), it's simply about money.

So what do you do when an ingenious guy and his company have given the people a way to mass produce the most popular gun platform in the country for a very affordable price, thus potentially depriving you of millions of dollars in tax revenue and there's not a damn thing you can do about it?

The way the current climate is in the USA you set him up to be sent to prison for a very, very long time, simply by getting a girl to #metoo him.
Job done.


https://ghostgunner.net/

The government are very much interested in Cody Wilson.
They issued him with a Federal Firearms License so he is legally allowed to sell guns.
He released the plans for many 3D printed weapons into the public domain for free via his company Defense Distributed's website called DEFCAD.
The USA government's State Department Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance then forced Defense Distributed to remove the plans from the DEFCAD site claiming rights to the information and threatening them with violations under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations.
Defense Distributed started making and selling the CNC ghost gunner machines that finish milling AR-15 lower receivers.
Defense Distributed then raised enough cash to sue the state department for violating their first amendment rights to free speech over the 3D printer plans, Defense Distributed won the lawsuit.



So yes, Cody Wilson got a Federal Firearms License and gave 3D printer plans away for free.
The government tried to stop him, he sued them and won.
Then he sold the people the means to mass produce their own AR-15 and 1911 receivers without giving the government any money and it's all perfectly legal.

You bet they're pissed off at him.