londonfog
Well-Known Member
Honestly have you read the report ? It really seems like you have not.
Bernie Sanders 2020
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Seriously. These idiots who voted for Trump all sound like crime syndicate lawyers.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
@Bugeye , you are aware that the whole investigation into trump's obvious and proven russia collusion started when papadopolous drunkenly bragged to another country's intelligence officials that trump was in bed with the russians, right?
not that it wasn't obvious since 2013/2014
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Now wait one doggone minute. Can you prove that Trump was really in that photo? Did you have a legal FISA warrant when you posted that? Was it really legal?@Bugeye , you are aware that the whole investigation into trump's obvious and proven russia collusion started when papadopolous drunkenly bragged to another country's intelligence officials that trump was in bed with the russians, right?
not that it wasn't obvious since 2013/2014
see how easy that is?
londonfog
Well-Known Member
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Trump would say he doesn't remember meeting her. Doesn't know who she is. He is photographed with lots of pretty women.DA COMRADE
Man -- that's soooo easy.
Herb & Suds
Well-Known Member
Probably a coffee boy tbh?
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
All it changes is the perception that politicians can get away with anything to the actual proof of same.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you spent years crying like a bitch about the deficit as obama brought it down by a trillion dollars and now you are rooting on conald as he spends like a drunken sailor.
worry about your corrupt, criminal, irredeemable party before you lecture us on ours you loser nazi.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
let's examine your previous post.
you, who celebrated alongside white supremacists on election night, are asking us to believe that not only do you want to see your hero impeached, but that you also care that democrats are doing everything their constituents want.
excuse me for not believing a thing you say. after i see you celebrating alongside white supremacists, i kinda find it hard to believe that you are genuinely interested in either of those things.
also, why is it that you develop amnesia whenever i list the obvious collusion that we all saw happen?
you should try posting without all the lying, bad faith, shamelessness, and hypocrisy ya nazi loser
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Exactly. You right wing nuts come to every discussion like a guilty criminal trying to beat a rap now.
racerboy71
bud bootlegger
there doesn't have to be an underlying crime to have obstruction of justice.. obstruction is a crime in and of itself..
the definition of obstruction..
Modern obstruction of justice, in United States jurisdictions, refers to the crime of offering interference of any sort to the work of police, investigators, regulatory agencies, prosecutors, or other (usually government) officials. Often, no actual investigation or substantiated suspicion of a specific incident need exist to support a charge of obstruction of justice. Common law jurisdictions other than the United States tend to use the wider offense of Perverting the course of justice.
firing comey in order to make an investigation go away is the very definition of obstruction, again, a crime in itself.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
...and yet people here still wonder why I don't like, trust or respect the Democratic Party any more than the Republicans.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Oh you're one to call other people right wingers, Mr pot calling the kettle black!
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
No, I'm very much liberal left.
Your leftist-authoritarian leanings have dictatorial overtones and you do support brutal dictators. So be careful with the kettle -pot analogy.
squarepush3r
Well-Known Member
TacoMac
Well-Known Member
Correct. That's the rich man's interpretation of the law.
In the real world of we typical Americans, if a police officer ask you, "which way did they go?" and you intentionally mislead them by pointing in the wrong direction, you are guilty of obstruction even if no crime was ever committed.
In the event a crime was committed, you are guilty of obstruction and aiding and abetting.
This rich man's interpretation they've come up with doesn't hold water in front of a judge. The problem is that Democrats are too chicken shit to do what should be done.
They're more worried about failing and losing their political clout than doing their jobs.
But that's nothing new in Washington.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
You're authoritarian left, top left quadrant