Yes you threw a tantrum and said you'd never read the "far right tabloid," so I obliged you with a left leaning source. You claimed that she said that she's not giving veto power to a child but can't provide me with a better word. You insert things and explanations that are not consistent with her direct quote. This form of complete denial screams triggered to me. You've changed your argument to "that's not what she said/meant," once proven wrong, to, "I think it's great." You're as wishy washy as a congressional Republican when they change their defense to "no QPQ," to, "QPQ is OK if you're the president." The fact that you can't articulate a meaningful argument without name calling further suggests your emotional state, or "triggered" state. Have a grain of accountability please.
There is literally nothing truthful about this post. Warren was not in fact promising to give a child any sort of veto power. I do in fact completely deny this, as I have consistently ever since long before you said she was "hysterical in her support of the woke community". Contradicting your blatant lie does not make a tantrum, nor am I therefore "triggered". There is nothing wishy washy about that, nor did I change my defense. You made a claim and I contradicted it. This has been my argument all along.
I'll simplify it though since you seem to be immune to logic. You said she was "hysterical in her support of the woke community". I asked you very politely to expound on this and said I didn't understand what you meant. Please go back and verify this. You then posted an article literally from a far right tabloid, to which I responded more directly and rudely since I have had such an exchange with you before in which you had a tantrum and refused to accept logic, instead using alt-right buzzwords like "triggered". I didn't change my argument when I saw the actual video of Warren speaking, I continued with the same argument, that she was not "hysterically supporting the woke community", nor was she promising a child veto power, but in fact that I continued to be correct in my assertion and furthermore, I whole-heartedly agree with what the woman said.
By all means, go back and see this, nobody else cares.
Why do women with power frighten you though?
