Sacrifice 13 Million Americans to save the economy

oopsididit

Well-Known Member
They extrapolate total cases from number of deaths and mortality rate.

China (with new data) is reporting ~1% mortality. So 1000 infected for every 1 that dies.

Today there are total 910 deaths at this moment. Considering a minimum 3 weeks from initial infection to death, and number of infections doubling every three days, that puts us somewhere around 30 million infections in the US.

For comparison, average flu numbers are between 10-50 million yearly. Covid-19 has happened in about 6 weeks.
If you believe the numbers out of China I have some toilet paper to sell you...
 

its.always.420

Well-Known Member

USA is still a lower percentage and the infections are just starting for most, plus hospitals are not yet over crowded. Give it 2 weeks and those numbers will be much higher.
1% is 1 in 100, not 1 in 1000. Cmon people!
Well they lady doctor said they estimate 1000 infections for every 1 death or at least that's what I remember. So that would be 0.1% mortality.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
What does that have to do with starting with the correct number. Population. Start with that. Then divide. That’s how math works. Less than 1%

We just watched them bail out businesses that were just bailed out 12 years ago.
Hey, Mr Right Wing propaganda poster, remember when you said this?

17 total deaths in US
Death rate over 80 is high. Everything else is nothing
Going to bed losers I got a job. Peace
That was on March 6

Good times.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
NY is currently expecting 140,000 hospitalizations over the next month. From my understanding about 15%-20% infected need hospitalization. Assuming 20% , does this mean ny authorities think there are roughly 700,000 ny’ers with the virus currently? This seems very low. Consider ny metro area has 20 million people. 8 million ride the public transit weekly. according to Dr Birx the virus has been active and spreading around NY for several weeks. If thats the case , dont their current estimates seem low?
Now consider the numbers from new york . 3,805 hospitalizations, 285 deaths. Thats a mortality rate of nearly 7.5% for those hospitalized. This is with ny having all the resources it needs to meet the current influx. As ny resources begin to stretch thin over coming weeks the mortality rate for those hospitalized will certainly rise. So assuming NY recieves needed resources the current projections , 140,000 beds, 40,000 icu’s. Currently they have only 50,000 beds. Lets just assume they get all the resources they need for their current projection, there would still be over 10,000 fatalities in NY in the coming weeks.

20 million in the ny metro area , with heavily used public transit system, serving as hub for transmission to 8 million riders a week, where the virus was active for weeks before the “lockdown”. Now lets assume instead of about 700,000/million out of the 20 million people currently having it, the real number is twice the current estimate. Lets assume its 2 million out of 20 million. That would require 200,000 beds. If its actually 5 out of the 20 million that are positive. Ny would need a million beds. And we would see very large number of people die before finding a hospital bed. Fatalities would reach hundreds of thousands just for NY. Please understand im not saying this is the case. Just pointing out the potential depending on how many were infected before the “lockdown”.

Couple days ago there were many people saying 50-75 % would get it. If that were the case we would lose nyc in the coming weeks and 1-2 million people would die in the state in the coming months. BUT, Dr.Birx pointed out at the conference couple days ago that 50-75 % sould not be infected till the virus runs through the population in multiple cycles. That would be 12 to 18months? Reading between the lines, Is she saying that would be the case if we kept up quarantine and social distancing till the vaccine?

Am i misunderstanding something? Please fee freel to correct.
Which misunderstanding are you talking about?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
With 327 million Americans and a death toll percentage increasing to around 4% due to over populated hospitals, it equates to around 13 million deaths.

Is it worth it to save the economy? Or let it burn and start a new one, perhaps a better one?

For reference, 37,000 people died of the flu last year in America.
The primary goal of the "stimulus package" is to continue the US dollar fiat currency swindle game. Overlords will kill to keep that one going.


Corona Virus is a very useful WMD, "weapon of mass distraction" . It's proving very useful to the tyrants.

1585188701055.png
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
What does that have to do with starting with the correct number. Population. Start with that. Then divide. That’s how math works. Less than 1%

We just watched them bail out businesses that were just bailed out 12 years ago.
All that tells you is the % of people who have it SO FAR. That % will increase tomorrow and continually each day thereafter. Come back to reality and stop listening to FOX news.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Ya but no. X those by 10 to account for the lack of testing in all western countries.
obama gave trump a booming economy and a pandemic response team

and just look what that racist orange retard did with it

20% unemployment coming, global depression imminent

food shortages, unchecked pandemic, mass panic -all trumps fault
 

oopsididit

Well-Known Member
obama gave trump a booming economy and a pandemic response team

and just look what that racist orange retard did with it

20% unemployment coming, global depression imminent

food shortages, unchecked pandemic, mass panic -all trumps fault
Hmm not what I was talking about since I was communicating with the adults about the lack of testing in Western countries resulting in inaccurate covid-19 numbers, but OK, you have mental difficulties I guess, so we won't bother you with that.
 
Top