TheBrutalTruth
Well-Known Member
No worse then when I'm forced to pay for idiotic bureaucrats, and stupid bitches who weren't able to keep their legs closed. I'm against that waste of money too.
For a country built around individuality we have lost our way. While there certainly are some people who have the chutzpah to revolt, I don't think they are in the right, being entirely too concerned with bullshit (Global Warming), idiocy (Socialism) and gross incompetence (violation of Personal Liberties through forced Atheism)
There was a quote that I've thrown around a few times by Alexander Hamilton (who admittedly was the pawn of international bankers, quite possibly the Rothschilds specifically), but that doesn't mean he was an idiot.
"Inequality of Property will exist as long as Liberty Exists."
There's nothing that can put it more succinctly. As long as Liberty Exists, then there will be Inequality of Property. There is no way around it, because not everyone is motivated by the same things.
The problem is that there are jack asses (mostly on the left) who insist that everyone share their goals, and then have the audacity to pretend they are for the little guy, and for the independent. They aren't. They're for lining their own pockets at the expense of the little guy, at the expense of the independent.
The wealthiest individuals in the country are all liberals, Gates, Soros, Buffett, who are entirely incompetent, and only made their fortunes on the back of better people. (Well, except Soros, I don't know how he made his money.)
Gates bought the rights to DOS from a independent programmer, he didn't program it himself (I doubt he could program his way out of a paperbag actually.)
Buffett made his money through investing. Investing in companies filled with competent, hard-working individuals that probably would rejoice if the government took a lot less out of their paychecks.
Hardly sterling examples of individuality.
Apple, Apple's not innovative. Touch Screens are not a "new" technology. I-Pods are not a new technology. Apple's strength is that it has a lot of fan-bitches that place too much stock in the Apple Brandname as a sign of individuality, failing to realize that through their decisions they are just conforming to the designs of another group. Of course, Apple isn't about to make a commercial where it's Apple on the Big Screen with Microsoft's new CEO hurling a hammer at the talking head of the CEO of Apple. That'd be a mockery of their customers.
Speaking of Conformity though. It's even more rampant on the left. You all spout the same bullshit, in the same words, in the same exact way. There's no individuality in your responses. I can rattle off your empty words backwards, forwards, sideways, and mirrored.
Ceos are Evil,
Ceos Make too much,
Government is going to save us all,
We need more regulation,
Government will protect us,
Military force is evil
Waterboarding is torture
So much idiocy.
CEOs aren't evil, no more so than the workers under them. Of course there are some on the left that think corporations are evil from the bottom up, but their nut cases, and few and far between, and thus not worth mentioning.
CEOs might make too much, but that's really no one's business but
1. The CEO
2. The Board of Directors
3. The Shareholders
It is not the government's business, nor any one else's that does not have a real ownership stake in the company.
What's the next point? Ahh yes, Government is going to save us all. You mean like it's doing right now? By totally destroying our economy through gross incompetence, an idiotic fiat money system, a banking system that is designed to loot the pockets of every American out there while maximize returns from the "creation" of money out of thin air, and the collection of interest?
The government could have stacked the 700 Billion dollars into a giant pile and used it to roast marshmallows and the banks probably would have just been fine with that action, because they are going to reap interest on that 700 Billion, and that's a lot of interest. At 5%/year it's 35 Billion. Sure, it gets divided by a lot of banks, but it's still a shit load of money. Enough that the government could have just handed it all out (preferably to people who actually PAY taxes, but that's another argument.)
Then on top of those three items there is the fact that the government stole the only truly honest money system we ever had (Gold/Silver) and made its use illegal. Then, when the government came up with an alternative, the bankers stepped in, and put a stop to its use (Lincoln Greenbacks).
Everyone talks about our money supply being backed by the Federal Government, but it's not. It's backed by the slavery of the entire country to bankers, who loan out money, and then collect the principal plus interest. Typically reaping the benefits, because they are playing a game that's nothing but positives for them, and nothing but negatives for their clients. (The best place to store your money is in fact in a Bank, but not in its vaults, at least during normal times when there is not a collapse of the credit markets.)
No, government isn't going to save us, it just makes everything worse.
The three laws of government interference
1. If it moves, tax it
2. If it's still moving, regulate it
3. If it's no longer moving, subsidize it
Then there's the entire debate about the morality of military force. I don't even see how there is a debate. Maybe all you clowns forgot about 9/11, maybe the Kurds in Iraq aren't real people to you. So much for your vaunted compassion...
Of course, that's just the life you keep on telling yourselves to justify your idiotic world views that require the theft of the product of the productive for the consumption of the incompetent.
Military Force isn't immoral, no more so than a gun is evil. Military Force is a political tool, just as a fire arm is a personal tool designed to kill people at a distance (preferably before they have a chance to steal from you.)
Ah, yes, and my favorite, waterboarding is torture. Having not had any personal experience with waterboarding, I can't really offer anything other than my opinion that it really is a piss-poor torture. When I think torture I think racks, hanging some one by the wrists from the ceiling, flaying them alive, using them to put out cigarette buts, maybe taking a metal pail, putting a giant Norwegian rat in it, and then applying heat to the outside of the pail until the rat starts burrowing in their flesh. Now that's torture.
Peace Through Superior Fire Power, and He who laughs last, thinks fastest.
