Attention Atheist

Mr.KushMan

Well-Known Member
You see that flower that grew 100x what it used to be because the seed was exposed to water? You see that bee that also came about the same way scavenging for that flower that just happened to yield pollen? Why does everything just so happen work together flawlessly? You athiest think that nature is not for you but against you, it is a cold harsh unforgiving thing right? Wrong, nature is there for us, it yeilds fruits, vegetables, and medicine specifically for all life on earth to survive. Do you honestly believe that everything just so happened to exist perfectly? No sorry to break it to you but the almighty creator put it here for us living creatures specifically (Not just for us but for every living creature on earth)

I had these beliefs before I even cracked the bible open. It is just too hard to ignore the obvious. When I grew up I heared the official story for why life exist, you know the whole big bang theory. Like i said in my earlier posts it is impossible to believe with all the luck and chance that must be mentioned when telling this fairytale. Then they come saying that there is a peice missing that scientist have not been able to find.

Anyway, there is too many question marks and unsurities for me to believe this fairytale, even if i wanted to I have had too many experiences with god to deny it. You see that herb in your pocket? guess what? Jah made the herb for man.
Do you see that beautiful cannabis plant? You are a complete moronic fool if you cannot realize that it was put here by the almighty creator.
I will give you parts of that and let you discover others. I love every moment and embrace it as my last, kind of like a hunter; I wait hungry and patient. Nature is everything including the things that run through your mind, a mind which seems to be extremely fragmented. Nature works seemingly flawlessly because of hundreds of thousands, maybe billions, of years of slow and persistent tweaking, but even still we experience influxes of various species, disease and weather patterns, so nature still exhibits chaoticism.

Think about sex, you create life in an incredibly joyous union. If it wasn't as rewarding, or even painful, do you think a species would have survived? At every level of creationist doctrine a logician is there to steer the herd back on path.

Now if the creator created all this, are we talking about the anthropomorphic man in the clouds, or a source of all being and reality, which I could at some level understand(the eternal toa, or the one(eg. the universe))? But no matter what science is our best tool to gaze at the scope of existence. Even if there are too many "unsurities", what makes a book full of provable fallacies better?

Science also states that there may be an infinite amount of universes and each representing a different quantum state, many worlds interpretation, so literally everything exists in every possible state always. And Big Bang can't work without quantum physics, and quantum physics can't work without numbers and numbers, whether they can quantify reality, are all we have to work with in this unknowable world.

So recite this to yourself daily like I have when I read it above my bed, "Wisdom is knowing I am nothing, love is knowing I am everything; and between the two my life moves." ----Sufi poet.

Peace
 

afrawfraw

Well-Known Member
"For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan

That is all.
 

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
You see that flower that grew 100x what it used to be because the seed was exposed to water? You see that bee that also came about the same way scavenging for that flower that just happened to yield pollen? Why does everything just so happen work together flawlessly? You athiest think that nature is not for you but against you, it is a cold harsh unforgiving thing right? Wrong, nature is there for us, it yeilds fruits, vegetables, and medicine specifically for all life on earth to survive. Do you honestly believe that everything just so happened to exist perfectly.
Ignoring for a minute some of the very imperfect things we see in nature, all you do here is make an argument from personal incredulity. Just because you fine awe and don't understand intricacies in nature, you attribute everything to a supernatural power. This is what ancient man did before they had the tools to understand nature.

So, have any other proof besides your personal feelings?
 

sniklefritzz

New Member
i cant believe this thread is still going, eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 

dickdasterdly666

Well-Known Member
Ignoring for a minute some of the very imperfect things we see in nature, all you do here is make an argument from personal incredulity. Just because you fine awe and don't understand intricacies in nature, you attribute everything to a supernatural power. This is what ancient man did before they had the tools to understand nature.

So, have any other proof besides your personal feelings?
I wouldn't say that ancient man did not understand nature. Previous civilizations that built pyramids and made extremely high tech Aerodynamic boats among many other things we still cant grasp, knew perfectly about nature and even more so i think in that itself they respected nature.
and besides Atheism has been around for thousands of years as a Pagan religion, so its nothing new, it was just reintroduced in our time and people got sucked in, and i agree that it gives a person a feeling of power and superiority and that is what is attractive about it. when Atheists think that there is no creator that is part of their faith/religion.

So just as you talk to the christian and say that he is basing his info on personal feelings, you would be doing the same.
Just as you would tell the christian that the bible is written by men and is full of contradictions therefore they shouldn't believe in it, but they still do, is effectively the same with Atheists when they block all misshapes, contradictions and uncertainty's and put them behind in order to practice their faith.

In these circumstances if you provide 1000's of proofs to them, they will still reject them. so there is no point.
the only way to solve this is to come to terms on common ground.
Humans don't even know why we yawn which is such a small issue, they don't even understand how their whole body's work and they feel superior and knowledgeable enough to deny the existence of a creator.
 

afrawfraw

Well-Known Member
I wouldn't say that ancient man did not understand nature. Previous civilizations that built pyramids and made extremely high tech Aerodynamic boats among many other things we still cant grasp, knew perfectly about nature and even more so i think in that itself they respected nature.
and besides Atheism has been around for thousands of years as a Pagan religion, so its nothing new, it was just reintroduced in our time and people got sucked in, and i agree that it gives a person a feeling of power and superiority and that is what is attractive about it. when Atheists think that there is no creator that is part of their faith/religion.

So just as you talk to the christian and say that he is basing his info on personal feelings, you would be doing the same.
Just as you would tell the christian that the bible is written by men and is full of contradictions therefore they shouldn't believe in it, but they still do, is effectively the same with Atheists when they block all misshapes, contradictions and uncertainty's and put them behind in order to practice their faith.

In these circumstances if you provide 1000's of proofs to them, they will still reject them. so there is no point.
the only way to solve this is to come to terms on common ground.
Humans don't even know why we yawn which is such a small issue, they don't even understand how their whole body's work and they feel superior and knowledgeable enough to deny the existence of a creator.
Atheism=Pagan? Oh, shit! And if you present R-E-A-L evidence to an Atheist, he/she will investigate it to the fullest, like any other evidence collected. Being an Atheist means simply that you don't arrive at conclusions unless there is substantial evidence...This is why we are skeptics! Because nothing is taken at face value, either to support or prove false the existence of Magic. There is no other common denominator! We are not organized. We do not have "Services". Just asking for a little evidence before we come to a conclusion. So far we have everything in our universe which contains NO MAGIC! Just because we haven't found all the answers does NOT mean Magic did it! THERE IS NO EVIDENCE SUPPORTING GOD. NONE. Mystery's are NOT evidence. Someone's reaction to shock is NOT evidence. Evidence, to me, are facts, supported by scientific findings. If a theory is tested by new evidence, it will be considered with an OPEN MIND. No evidence of Magic=NO MAGIC! I can collect more evidence proving YOUR existence than any one can collect proving a GOD. And that "Powerful" feeling your talking about...Where is it? I feel like an animal that will live it's life and die like every other form of life on this rock. Oh, to feel safe, and believe that this "loving Father" is there for me. It is NOT comforting to be an Atheist. TRUST ME! I grew up having entire classes turn on me and make fun of me because they couldn't understand my beliefs. People always view atheists as "this" or "that". We're just people who don't buy without evidence. PERIOD.
 

dickdasterdly666

Well-Known Member
Atheism=Pagan? Oh, shit! And if you present R-E-A-L evidence to an Atheist, he/she will investigate it to the fullest, like any other evidence collected. Being an Atheist means simply that you don't arrive at conclusions unless there is substantial evidence...This is why we are skeptics! Because nothing is taken at face value, either to support or prove false the existence of Magic. There is no other common denominator! We are not organized. We do not have "Services". Just asking for a little evidence before we come to a conclusion. So far we have everything in our universe which contains NO MAGIC! Just because we haven't found all the answers does NOT mean Magic did it! THERE IS NO EVIDENCE SUPPORTING GOD. NONE. Mystery's are NOT evidence. Someone's reaction to shock is NOT evidence. Evidence, to me, are facts, supported by scientific findings. If a theory is tested by new evidence, it will be considered with an OPEN MIND. No evidence of Magic=NO MAGIC! I can collect more evidence proving YOUR existence than any one can collect proving a GOD. And that "Powerful" feeling your talking about...Where is it? I feel like an animal that will live it's life and die like every other form of life on this rock. Oh, to feel safe, and believe that this "loving Father" is there for me. It is NOT comforting to be an Atheist. TRUST ME! I grew up having entire classes turn on me and make fun of me because they couldn't understand my beliefs. People always view atheists as "this" or "that". We're just people who don't buy without evidence. PERIOD.
lol first of all im not attacking you in anyway and im not trying to change your views on anything, im simply talking about my personal opinion on the matter.
What you mean to say is being an atheist TO YOU PERSONALLY, "means simply that you don't arrive at conclusions unless there is substantial evidence...This is why we are skeptics!"
Because there are no rules for atheists it means you are all in your own little boats and worlds.
Dawkins thinks humanity should follow Darwin just long enough to cast off Jesus Christ and religion as a whole etc..., then ditch Darwin in favor of following Richard Dawkins' opinion on life, the universe and everything.

"Evidence, to me, are facts, supported by scientific findings. If a theory is tested by new evidence, it will be considered with an OPEN MIND".

Great im really happy you said that because ill present you with something after your reply. and see that OPEN MIND of yours that you talk about.


"I can collect more evidence proving YOUR existence than any one can collect proving a GOD."

that's interesting, can you provide your evidence? and then ill provide my evidence if you haven't hopelessly crushed me with yours.

And that "Powerful" feeling your talking about...Where is it? I feel like an animal that will live it's life and die like every other form of life on this rock. Oh, to feel safe, and believe that this "loving Father" is there for me.
I know atheists that don't give a shit about real science or religion and dont find it necessary to follow up diverse evidence, all they needed was the initial idea to get rid of the thought of a creator even though they themselves say there might be a possibility there is a god, it gives them a feeling of power, that look im cursing god all day and doing what i want from bad to good and if there is a god he is powerless against me. If your not in that boat then your not fully submerged like others which is a positive thing i think.


"It is NOT comforting to be an Atheist. TRUST ME! I grew up having entire classes turn on me and make fun of me because they couldn't understand my beliefs. People always view atheists as "this" or "that". We're just people who don't buy without evidence."

see here it is again, while YOU don't deem it comforting others may do and thats why there are so many different atheistic views today, actually in detail no two atheists share the exact same views as a whole.
all they do is compliment each other in areas they agree on and bash each other when they clash.
Tomorrow a new guy might come along and present a theory which is better than both Dawkins and Darwin and bash the both of them. Its a constant game of building bridges and bridging gaps.

lol again i say no offense just conversation.:eyesmoke: peace.
 

Leothwyn

Well-Known Member
I wouldn't say that ancient man did not understand nature. Previous civilizations that built pyramids and made extremely high tech Aerodynamic boats among many other things we still cant grasp, knew perfectly about nature and even more so i think in that itself they respected nature.
I don't know if I'd equate technological ingenuity with understanding nature. I think they did have a much closer relationship to nature than we do, but they didn't have a great understanding of how it worked beyond what they personally experienced. They saw the sun as a magic spirit. Modern religions are doing the same thing - making up stories for things that haven't been explained. I do acknowledge that there is a certain amount of faith in atheism, but it's based on a foundation of logic and extrapolation from what we do know, and have proven scientifically. There's a big difference between that and clinging to fantastic stories about magic and spirits - stories that were made up thousands of years ago by people who had very limited scientific knowledge.
 

afrawfraw

Well-Known Member
lol first of all im not attacking you in anyway and im not trying to change your views on anything, im simply talking about my personal opinion on the matter.
What you mean to say is being an atheist TO YOU PERSONALLY, "means simply that you don't arrive at conclusions unless there is substantial evidence...This is why we are skeptics!"
Because there are no rules for atheists it means you are all in your own little boats and worlds.
Dawkins thinks humanity should follow Darwin just long enough to cast off Jesus Christ and religion as a whole etc..., then ditch Darwin in favor of following Richard Dawkins' opinion on life, the universe and everything.

"Evidence, to me, are facts, supported by scientific findings. If a theory is tested by new evidence, it will be considered with an OPEN MIND".

Great im really happy you said that because ill present you with something after your reply. and see that OPEN MIND of yours that you talk about.


"I can collect more evidence proving YOUR existence than any one can collect proving a GOD."

that's interesting, can you provide your evidence? and then ill provide my evidence if you haven't hopelessly crushed me with yours.

And that "Powerful" feeling your talking about...Where is it? I feel like an animal that will live it's life and die like every other form of life on this rock. Oh, to feel safe, and believe that this "loving Father" is there for me.
I know atheists that don't give a shit about real science or religion and dont find it necessary to follow up diverse evidence, all they needed was the initial idea to get rid of the thought of a creator even though they themselves say there might be a possibility there is a god, it gives them a feeling of power, that look im cursing god all day and doing what i want from bad to good and if there is a god he is powerless against me. If your not in that boat then your not fully submerged like others which is a positive thing i think.


"It is NOT comforting to be an Atheist. TRUST ME! I grew up having entire classes turn on me and make fun of me because they couldn't understand my beliefs. People always view atheists as "this" or "that". We're just people who don't buy without evidence."

see here it is again, while YOU don't deem it comforting others may do and thats why there are so many different atheistic views today, actually in detail no two atheists share the exact same views as a whole.
all they do is compliment each other in areas they agree on and bash each other when they clash.
Tomorrow a new guy might come along and present a theory which is better than both Dawkins and Darwin and bash the both of them. Its a constant game of building bridges and bridging gaps.

lol again i say no offense just conversation.:eyesmoke: peace.
See evidence of your existence above ;)

And being an Atheist IS simply that you don't arrive at conclusions unless there is substantial evidence...PERIOD. Any other views are, like you said, individualistic. I wasn't attacking you. I'm sorry you felt so. Your information was just a little...Off. And if you think that the guys having pissing contests are having fun, look a little closer.
 

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
See evidence of your existence above ;)

And being an Atheist IS simply that you don't arrive at conclusions unless there is substantial evidence...PERIOD.
To be perfectly accurate, that is the definition of skeptic. An atheist merely means NOT a theist. IOW, does not have a belief in god or gods. Buddhists are technically athesists. Young children that have not been taught about a god are atheists. Just because one is atheist does not make them a skeptic or empiricist.

It is for this reason that atheism is not a belief system nor requires any faith. One can be an atheist merely because they have never put any thought whatsoever into the subject. That hardly requires faith.

Now someone like you, me and Dawkins, certainly have thought about it and have come to the conclusion that there is insufficient evidence to accept the word of others that there is a god. That too doesn't require faith because no one is making a positive claim about the non-existence of a god.

@ dickdasterdly666, this is where your conclusions fail. People aren't actively NOT believing in a god for ulterior motives like you imply, to feel powerful or whatever. An empiricist that finds evidence lacking for a worldwide deluge doesn't necessarily have an agenda to prove Genesis wrong and feel superior but is merely following the evidence. Unless you can tell us what misshapes (whatever that means), contradictions and uncertainties we are ignoring, you still FAIL.
 

afrawfraw

Well-Known Member
To be perfectly accurate, that is the definition of skeptic. An atheist merely means NOT a theist. IOW, does not have a belief in god or gods. Buddhists are technically athesists. Young children that have not been taught about a god are atheists. Just because one is atheist does not make them a skeptic or empiricist.

It is for this reason that atheism is not a belief system nor requires any faith. One can be an atheist merely because they have never put any thought whatsoever into the subject. That hardly requires faith.

Now someone like you, me and Dawkins, certainly have thought about it and have come to the conclusion that there is insufficient evidence to accept the word of others that there is a god. That too doesn't require faith because no one is making a positive claim about the non-existence of a god.

@ dickdasterdly666, this is where your conclusions fail. People aren't actively NOT believing in a god for ulterior motives like you imply, to feel powerful or whatever. An empiricist that finds evidence lacking for a worldwide deluge doesn't necessarily have an agenda to prove Genesis wrong and feel superior but is merely following the evidence. Unless you can tell us what misshapes (whatever that means), contradictions and uncertainties we are ignoring, you still FAIL.
I agree. There was a discussion about Atheists in contrast...I do not count confused folks as Atheists AS IT APPLIES AS A DEFINITION IN THESE DAYS AND TIMES...Agnostic is the label applied to undecided folks...Atheist core value=the absence of belief that any deities exist...But I skipped a step and was explaining how one would arrive at such a belief. Dickdasterdly666 Identified Atheists as Pagan, which is INCORRECT, unless your using the CHRISTIAN definition which identifies Atheists as Heathens, which is a more appropriate term for me/us.

So it's Mr. Heathen to you...just kidding. I'm not upset in any way, Dick. Just bewildered at your beleifs, as you are of mine;)
 

afrawfraw

Well-Known Member
"Just because one is atheist does not make them a skeptic or empiricist." - Mindphuk

You would think, but statistically, it's dead on! In this age, how do you come to the conclusion, even if your parents are Atheists, that there are NO deities without second guessing everyone who claims so?
 

KiefCatcher

Well-Known Member
"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able, and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?"

-Epicurus (341 BCE)
 

afrawfraw

Well-Known Member
Bear in mind that human beings are social animals and arriving at a conclusion which is not popular requires a lot of conviction. I also find this funny;


The Federal Bureau of Prisons does have statistics on religious
affiliations of inmates. The following are total number of
inmates per religion category:

Response Number %
---------------------------- --------
Catholic 29267 39.164%
Protestant 26162 35.008%
Muslim 5435 7.273%
American Indian 2408 3.222%
Nation 1734 2.320%
Rasta 1485 1.987%
Jewish 1325 1.773%
Church of Christ 1303 1.744%
Pentecostal 1093 1.463%
Moorish 1066 1.426%
Buddhist 882 1.180%
Jehovah Witness 665 0.890%
Adventist 621 0.831%
Orthodox 375 0.502%
Mormon 298 0.399%
Scientology 190 0.254%
Atheist 156 0.209%
Hindu 119 0.159%
Santeria 117 0.157%
Sikh 14 0.019%
Bahai 9 0.012%
Krishna 7 0.009%
---------------------------- --------
Total Known Responses 74731 100.001% (rounding to 3 digits does this)
 

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
"Just because one is atheist does not make them a skeptic or empiricist." - Mindphuk

You would think, but statistically, it's dead on! In this age, how do you come to the conclusion, even if your parents are Atheists, that there are NO deities without second guessing everyone who claims so?
I agree for the most part but you did skip steps and I was mainly countering dickdasterdly666 claims that atheism is a faith. I was just trying to be more precise for the sake of the discussion.
 

dickdasterdly666

Well-Known Member
I don't know if I'd equate technological ingenuity with understanding nature. I think they did have a much closer relationship to nature than we do, but they didn't have a great understanding of how it worked beyond what they personally experienced. They saw the sun as a magic spirit. Modern religions are doing the same thing - making up stories for things that haven't been explained. I do acknowledge that there is a certain amount of faith in atheism, but it's based on a foundation of logic and extrapolation from what we do know, and have proven scientifically. There's a big difference between that and clinging to fantastic stories about magic and spirits - stories that were made up thousands of years ago by people who had very limited scientific knowledge.
See evidence of your existence above ;)

And being an Atheist IS simply that you don't arrive at conclusions unless there is substantial evidence...PERIOD. Any other views are, like you said, individualistic. I wasn't attacking you. I'm sorry you felt so. Your information was just a little...Off. And if you think that the guys having pissing contests are having fun, look a little closer.
I agree. There was a discussion about Atheists in contrast...I do not count confused folks as Atheists AS IT APPLIES AS A DEFINITION IN THESE DAYS AND TIMES...Agnostic is the label applied to undecided folks...Atheist core value=the absence of belief that any deities exist...But I skipped a step and was explaining how one would arrive at such a belief. Dickdasterdly666 Identified Atheists as Pagan, which is INCORRECT, unless your using the CHRISTIAN definition which identifies Atheists as Heathens, which is a more appropriate term for me/us.

So it's Mr. Heathen to you...just kidding. I'm not upset in any way, Dick. Just bewildered at your beleifs, as you are of mine;)
HEHE, no offence meant, let me finish my first point and ill get onto anything else you want after, but for now im going to be finishing my reply soon so we will see if bewildering can clime to new heights or drop dead. ;)
 

afrawfraw

Well-Known Member
I agree for the most part but you did skip steps and I was mainly countering dickdasterdly666 claims that atheism is a faith. I was just trying to be more precise for the sake of the discussion.
No, not really because there is no argument and I'm just typing stuff so you'll keep reading. We pretty much have an accord on this, so...Uhh...Don't drink the Kool Aid...I'm lit...
 

afrawfraw

Well-Known Member
But as an Atheist it's refreshing to know I covet the true knowledge and the sheeple scramble at my feet. ROFLMAO!!!
 

dickdasterdly666

Well-Known Member
I don't know if I'd equate technological ingenuity with understanding nature. I think they did have a much closer relationship to nature than we do, but they didn't have a great understanding of how it worked beyond what they personally experienced. They saw the sun as a magic spirit. Modern religions are doing the same thing - making up stories for things that haven't been explained. I do acknowledge that there is a certain amount of faith in atheism, but it's based on a foundation of logic and extrapolation from what we do know, and have proven scientifically. There's a big difference between that and clinging to fantastic stories about magic and spirits -.
Great, i just wanted someone else to admit to the FACT that older civilizations did not have means of understanding when it came to nature, even those who were advanced technologically in ways we cant explain.

It might sound as if I just contradicted myself, but follow below so you can see why.

See evidence of your existence above ;)

And being an Atheist IS simply that you don't arrive at conclusions unless there is substantial evidence...PERIOD. Any other views are, like you said, individualistic. I wasn't attacking you. I'm sorry you felt so. Your information was just a little...Off. And if you think that the guys having pissing contests are having fun, look a little closer.

lol, i didn't think you were attacking me i just thought my reply might have sounded like an attack so i wasn’t sure.

anyway back to the subject.
just a reminder:
afrawfraw :
"Just asking for a little evidence before we come to a conclusion."
"Mystery's are NOT evidence."
"Evidence, to me, are facts, supported by scientific findings."
" If a theory is tested by new evidence, it will be considered with an OPEN MIND"
"No evidence of Magic=NO MAGIC!"

lol, fair enough the evidence of me being here is the evidence that my writing was above. i agree.
and im not into any type of peeing contests so i wouldnt know.:D

Now.
You want to know about FACTS you say.
Im going to give you an appetiser, and if it doesn’t tickle you then there is no point for more.


=============================================================
NOTE: Allah is God in Arabic{same as Elohim in Judaism}

The sea:
Dr. William W. Hay, Professor of Geological Sciences at the University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A. Formerly Dean of the Rosentiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science at the University of Miami. http://www.colorado.edu/GeolSci/faculty/hay.html

With regard to partitions between different oceans, these bodies of water are not homogeneous as it might appear to us, they are in fact different seas distinguished by varying degrees of salinity, temperature and density.

In the following we can see a divider between the Mediterranean and the Atlantic Ocean
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]SeasOceans_02.jpgThis is the base of the Rock of Gibraltar. We can spot the coloured partition between the two bodies of water, though the naked eye cannot see it in nature. This has become possible by means of satellite photography and remote sensing techniques.
Professor Hay "I find it very interesting that this sort of information is in the ancient scripture of the Holy Qur'aan, and I have no way of knowing where they would come from, but I think it is extremely interesting that they are there and that this work is going on to discover it, the meaning of some of the passages."
.
X- Whom do you think is the original source of such information?
Professor Hay: "Well, I would think it must be the Divine Being!"

“He has let free the two seas meeting together: Between them is a barrier which they do not transgress”. {55: 19-20}

When the water from one sea enters the other sea, it loses its distinctive characteristic and becomes homogenized with the other water. In a way this barrier serves as a transitional homogenizing area for the two waters
…………………………………………………………………………………………
The ocean is split into two main layers, the surface and deep part. The surface of the ocean is characterized by the warmth/light, the deep bydarkness.
The light ray is composed of seven colours, and when the light ray hits water, it is scattered into these seven colours.

SeasOceans_06.jpg
In the above diagram we can see the colours are absorbed according to the filtration by depth.
If you are diving at 30 + feet and cut urself you would not be able to see the blood as at that point the red would have been filtered out by the layers. And so do the other colours shown.
We can see that darkness is noticed in a progression rather than all of a sudden, + darkness originates in the first place because of barriers that conceal light

“Or (the unbelievers state) is like the depths of darkness in a vast deep ocean, overwhelmed with billow topped by billow, topped by (dark) clouds: Depths of darkness, one above another: If a man stretches out his hand, he can hardly see it! For any to whom Allah does not give light, there is no light.”{24:40}
======================================================


“Say: The (Qur'aan) was sent down by Him who knows the secrets (that is) in the heavens and the earth... {25:6}”

“Verily in the heavens and the earth, are signs for those who believe. And in the creation of yourselves and the fact that animals are scattered (through the earth), are signs for those of assured faith. And in the alteration of night and day, and the fact that Allah sends down sustenance from the sky, and revives therewith the earth after its death, and in the change of the winds, - are signs for those that are wise. Such are the signs of Allah, which we rehearse to thee in truth: then in what exposition will they believe after Allah and his signs?” 45: 3-6}


Existence of subatomic particles

Theory of Atomism was introduced by the Greek Democritus 23 centuries ago.
And everyone after him including the Arabs used to believe the same. They thought that the atom was the smallest unit of matter.{Arabic word for atom used is Dharra, also can be pronounced Zara, Thara.}
The below verse clearly disapproved of that

“The Unbelievers say, Never to us will come The Hour: say, Nay! But most surely, By my Lord, it will come Upon you by Him Who knows the unseen From Whom is not hidden The least little atom In the Heavens or on earth: Nor is there anything less Than that, or greater, but Is in the Record Perspicuous.”

“See you not, that Allâh sends down water (rain) from the sky, and causes it to penetrate the earth, (and then makes it to spring up) as water-springs and afterward thereby produces crops of different colours, and afterward they wither and you see them turn yellow, then He makes them dry and broken pieces. Verily, in this, is a Reminder for men of understanding.”
Its speaking about the Omniscience of God, His knowledge of everything hidden or apparent. Further it is saying that God is aware of everything, smaller or bigger than an atom.

=====================================================

Bernard Palissy was the first one to describe the water cycle in.1580
Thales of Miletus thought that the surface mist of the sea was picked up by clouds and eventually went into land and the rained.
In prior times people did not know where underground water came from they thought that under the winds effects on the ocean thrusts the water into the interior of land, they even thought it returned through secret passages, or the great abyss.
Even since Platos time this passage has been named the Tartarus.
A great thinker of the eighteenth century called Descartes even accepted this.
Aristotle’s theory only prevailed in the 19 century and today we know rainwater that seeps into the cracks in the ground is the reason.
None of the above went into the great detail of the Quran.

"He sends down rain From the sky And with it gives life to The earth after it is dead: Verily in that are Signs For those who are wise.” {30:24}
{ill leave that one with a ? for you}

“And We send down water From the sky according to (Due) measure, and We cause it To soak in the soil; And We certainly are able To drain it off (with ease).” {23:18}
“Seest thou not that Allah Sends down rain from The sky, and leads it Through springs in the earth? Then He causes to grow, Therewith, produce of various Colours.”{39:21}
The emphasis on due measure is that it is claimed that rain evaporates and drops in constant measured quantity's, which is only confirmed nowadays through technological researches.



“And We send the fecundating winds, Then cause the rain to descend From the sky, therewith providing You with water (in abundance).” {15:22}

Hydrology of today completely agrees with the Quran on such verses. more can be found:

{7:57},{3:9}, {25:48- 49}, {13:17}, {36:34}, {50:9-11} ill stop here im sure you get the point.

===============================================================


Folding is a recently discovered fact in geology, it is responsible for the formation of mountains.
Earth has a radius around 3100 and the crust we are living on is pretty thin being anywhere between 1-30 miles, and because of that earth is highly susceptible to earthquakes. And the mountains are the ones that keep us stable because they are like pegs that holds the earths crust firm for stability otherwise we would be all over the place.

“Have We not made The earth as a wide Expanse, And the mountains as pegs?”{78: 6-7}

“And We have set on the earth Mountains standing firm, Lest it should shake with them.” {21:31}

Earth has many broken rigid plates around 100 km in thickness. These plates float on aesthenosphere. Mountain formations happen at the border of the plates. Mountains have the strongest foundations found in nature which are up2 90kms in thickness, continental surfaces come second I think at 30+km deep and so on.


“And the mountains Hath He firmly fixed.” {79-32}

=============================================================
Also the barriers between salt and fresh water bodies:

“And made a separating bar between the two bodies Of flowing water?”{27:61}


“It is He Who has Let free the two bodies Of flowing water: One palatable and sweet, And the other salty and bitter; Yet has He Made a barrier between them, And a partition that is forbidden To be passed”.{25:53}


In estuaries, where fresh and salt water meet, things are different from what is found in places where two oceans meet. It has been discovered that what distinguishes fresh from salt water is a pycnocline zone with a set and stable density discontinuity separating the two layers. This zone of separation has salinity different from both types of water.


Allah is talking about an evil man that didn’t allow the Prophet Muhammad {Pbuh} from praying.
“Let him beware! If he does not stop, We will take him by the naasiyah (front of the head), a lying, sinful naasiyah!” (96: 15-16)

The skull at the front of the head we find the prefrontal area of the cerebrum. Essentials of Anatomy & Physiology Book says about this area: "The motivation and the foresight to plan and initiate movements occur in the anterior portion of the frontal lobes, the prefrontal area .This is a region of the association cortex… It also says: In relation to its involvement in motivation, the prefrontal area is also thought to be the functional centre for aggression…"

==========================================

Next is a bit o Bio.

As we all know, only now do we know that everything was made of water, and we are certain that some sort of big bang happened. So we are in agreement on the following.
Cytoplasm which is a basic substance in cells are 80% water.
Most organisms also consist of somewhere between 50-90% water.
Humans 71%. {give or take}
And every living entity needs water to exist.

“Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one Unit of Creation), before We clove them asunder? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?” {21:30}

“And Allah has created Every animal from water”.{ 24:45}

“It is He Who has Created man from water: Then has He established Relationships of lineage And marriage: for thy Lord Has power (over all things).” {25:54}

-=============================

It was long thought that plants didn’t have sexes until recently.

“And has sent Down water from the sky. With it have We produced Diverse pairs of plants Each separate from the others.” {20:53}

“And fruit Of every kind He made In pairs, two and two.” {13-3}

{a little info} http://www.physorg.com/news143899812.html
“And of everything We have created pairs.” {51:49}


“Glory to Allah, Who created In pairs all things that The earth produces, as well as Their own (human) kind And (other) things of which They have no knowledge.” {36-36}

================================

Next on Zoology.


“There is not an animal (That lives) on the earth, Nor a being that flies On its wings, but (forms Part of) communities like you.” {6:38}
We know because of research that animals and birds organize, live and work together.


“And thy Lord taught the Bee To build its cells in hills, On trees, and in (mens) habitations; Then to eat of all The produce (of the earth), And find with skill the spacious Paths of its Lord.” {16: 68-69}

Karl Ritter von Frisch (November 20, 1886 – June 12, 1982) was an Austrian ethologist who received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1973, along with Nikolaas Tinbergen and Konrad Lorenz.
His work centered on investigations of the sensory perceptions of the honey bee and he was one of the first to translate the meaning of the waggle dance. His theory was disputed by other scientists and greeted with skepticism at the time. Only recently was it definitively proved to be accurate theoretical analysis.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_von_Frisch

{summary}After discovering any new garden or flower the Bee goes back and tells its co-bees the exact direction and map to get there, which is known as bee dance. The meanings of this movement are to transmit information between them. They have been discovered using photography and other methods..
“And find with skill the spacious Paths of its Lord.”



The parable of those who Take protectors other than Allah Is that of the Spider, Who builds (to itself) A house; but truly The flimsiest of houses Is the Spiders house, If they but knew. {29: 41}
If your not sure just how incredibly powerful a spiders web is, maybe you should check.

And before Solomon were marshalled His hosts of Jinn’s and men And birds, and they were all Kept in order and ranks. At length, when they came To a (lowly) valley of ants, One of the ants said: O ye ants, get into Your habitations, lest Solomon And his hosts crush you (Under foot) without knowing it. {27: 17-18}

Before a long time people would have laughed about ants talking to each other.
Now though we know how sophisticated ants really are and how they:
Bury their dead in a similar way that we do.
Have a remarkably sophisticated communication system
Have meetings every now and then and talk.
Have regular markets where they exchange goods.
Have an extremely organised structure, with supervisors, workers, managers Etc..etc..etc…


“We took the Children of Israel across the sea: Pharaoh and his hosts followed them in insolence and spite. At length, when overwhelmed with the flood, he said: "I believe that there is no god except Him Whom the Children of Israel believe in: I am of those who submit (to Allah in Islam)." (It was said to him): "Ah now!- But a little while before, wast thou in rebellion!- and thou didst mischief (and violence)! "This day shall We save thee in the body, that thou mayest be a sign to those who come after thee! but verily, many among mankind are heedless of Our Signs!” {10: 90-91}
"So this day We shall deliver your (dead) body (out from the sea) that you may be a sign to those who come after you! And verily, many among mankind are heedless of Our Ayat (verses, signs, revelations, etc.)" (10:92)

Pharaoh died from asphyxiation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Bucaille
Dr. Maurice Bucaille, who (being also a Christian) was conversant with the Biblical version of Pharaoh's story as being drowned in pursuit of Prophet Moses, only till late 20th century did he realise, the Holy Quran made the definite prediction about the preservation of the body of that same Pharaoh of Moses' time.

In his book, The Bible, The Qur’an and Science, Bucaille aims to prove the Qur’an is in agreement with scientific facts, while the Bible is not. He claims that in Islam, science and religion have always been “twin sisters” (vii). According to Bucaille, there are monumental errors of science in the Bible and not a single error in the Quran (120), whose descriptions of natural phenomena make it compatible with modern science. Bucaille concludes that the Qur’an is the reliable word of God.
He later learned Arabic and then became Muslim.

The body is usually lying in Cairo museum but it tours around I remember it being in Chicago a while ago if im not mistaken as well as Dallas Texas etc…

Lol you know what ill stop here and call it a day and note I haven’t even scratched the surface of these subjects and I haven’t even gone in depth.
Not to mention that I have excluded most if not all Astronomy/Cosmology, Medicine, Physiology, Step by Step Embryonic process that would take pages up, Senses, speed of light etc…
There are lots of different verses that explain the same things, but I selected a few here and there. I didn’t want to bore you with science and maths and how to cure the problems of the world etc…

A. Einstein : Science without religion is lame, and religion without science is blind.

It might be interesting to note that our history and huge scientific, philosophic etc…contribution to the world is completely forgotten about and not mentioned for some reason. I saw on one of the threads here someone talking about Nobel prize winners and that 1 Muslim maybe of everyone would get an award trying to imply that we are backward and that we don’t have scientists or we are stupid, I would urge those people to use all three of their brain cells to push a little further research wise before opening their mouths. You just might find that things are far from what you think, see or speak.


ANYWAY, PLEASE NOT THAT THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION IS NOT A 100% ACURATE AND SOME WORDS THAT ARE IN ARABIC WOULD DESCRIBE SOMETHING SPACIFIC OR ONE WORD CAN MEAN 3-4 DIFFERENT WORDS TOGETHER, WHICH CAN NOT DESCRIBE THE PROPER MESSAGE OF THE VERSE BECAUSE ENGLISH AND MOST LANGUAGES ARE POOR LANGUAGES COMPARED TO THE RICH ARABIC LANGUAGE SO THEY MIGHT NOT HAVE EXACT TRANSLATIONS, FORCING THE TRANSLATOR TO USE THE NEXT BEST WORD THAT DESCRIBES THE WORD/SITUATION.
That is why the Arabic text is always next to the translation.

The Holy Quran is FLAWLESS. 0 contradictions, 0 mistakes, 0 changes have been made and it is still a 100% the same as 1400yrs ago, there are no Versions as some might like to believe.
=============================================================


Now let me remind you once more:
Leothwyn:
“they did have a much closer relationship to nature than we do, but they didn't have a great understanding of how it worked beyond what they personally experienced”.
“stories that were made up thousands of years ago by people who had very limited scientific knowledge”
Afrawfraw:
1} "Just asking for a little evidence before we come to a conclusion."
2} "Mystery's are NOT evidence."
3} "Evidence, to me, are facts, supported by scientific findings."
3}"If a theory is tested by new evidence, it will be considered with an OPEN MIND"
4}"No evidence of Magic=NO MAGIC!"



Ok so which one of the above did I come short in other than 2? Though I think we can even include 2 since the more we know about science the more unknown mysteries we unlock.


Then refute anything that I have presented so we can weed out what you dont agree with and continue with the rest.

Now can you both please explain to me HOW could a MAN that is not able to write or read, come up with a book of this magnitude in the middle of the dessert?
And don’t tell me it was MAGIC- because ill use ur formula against you.:mrgreen:.

As soon as you get through this then we can progress to more complex issues.

On another note I asked a question a while back on this thread about who would be able to tell you what a machine is without inspection by anyone. And the answer was somewhat like the manufacturer or designer or producer.
Earth...Do you get the drift now?

And about Christianity I am here to serve.
I {god willing} will show you what your eyes have probably not seen before, what ever testament the Christians hold bring it forth and ill show you Islam inside it and ill even go further and show you that the Crucifixion/Resurrection never happened, that Jesus{pbuh} wasn’t God and that Jesus foretold Islam and prophet Muhammad{pbuh}.

And if you want to see the contradictions that you probably haven’t seen ill present those too.

PS. This is not an insult to faithful Christians I will simply provide PROOF and you can throw it out or pick at it, either way no disrespect. So please no foul language etc…

And what ever misconception you may have, doubts, rumours or brainwashing you may have been subjected to, fire away ALL your questions about any aspect{talked about above or not} and I will try and answer them to clear them all.

By the way one of the challenges the Quran has presented for the past 1400 years has been to try and produce a similar Surah/Chapter in Arabic.
And 100s of years have passed and everyone who has tried from all over the world, especially famous Arabs have ended in misery, the challenge still holds its position if ur interested in taking a swing at it J.

“Or do they say: "He (Muhammad{buh}) has forged it?" Say: "Bring then a surah (chapter) like unto it, and call upon whomsoever you can, besides Allah, if you are truthful!” {10: 37-38}


“And if you (Arab pagans, Jews, and Christians) are in doubt concerning that which We have sent down (i.e. the Qur'an) to Our slave (Muhammad {pbuh}), then produce a surah (chapter) of the like thereof and call your witnesses (supporters and helpers) besides Allah, if you are truthful.” {2:23}







And finally as i end ill say a few.
The hardest war is the war against your ego and yourself.

And to every road to success there is a hard battle and nothing comes easy or for free.
 
Top