Why Is The Bible So Revered As The "Word of GOD"?

[ginjawarrior]

http://www.learnthebible.org/cambrian-explosion-disproves-evolution.html

Anthropologist went searching and found a layer of fossil called the Cambrian Explosion, because it refers to the great quantity and diversity of life found in this geologic column. You see, evolutionist claim that humankind took millions of years to establish, after crawling out of the sea. But this fossil layer proves that humankind had a sudden appearance and did not take millions of years to evolve

You sir should pay attention to the point.

mankind didnt appear until half a billion years after the cambrian explosion thats hardly all of a sudden...

 

[BrotherBuz]

.The theists come with crazy claims, the rest of us point it out, it's acknowledged by everyone but the one making the claim and the circle jerk continues ad infinitim. Babs, crackerboy, weed4cash..brotherbudz.

My claims are founded in bedrock. I have physical, fossil and tangible evidence, what do you have?. You got nothing-nothing.

 

[KlosetKing]

First u want a "theory" then u want fact, which do u want? u want to know how eve was made but u believe how God made Adam? why u would choose THAT, I just don't know.

Actually i never said i believed ANY of that story cuz i dont. I was merely using a specific example, i dont want to speak in generalities like you guys are so pro at doing.

Noah, millions, said who? That is YOUR interpretation. Seeing as the bible says God had already killed off mankind & all living creatures once before, and the fact that we know species evolve from other species, that explains that...there were far from millions, probably not more then a couple hundred; my interpretation, certainly plausible.

You continue this, but it is only because you do not accept evolution as even slightly plausible. The bottom line is there were millions of animals, trees, insects, and numerous other forms of life that he COULDN'T HAVE POSSIBLY got them all. To think that one old man built a big enough boat to even fit 2 of just 1 thousand animals is an absolute fallacy, and mentally handicapped children still have trouble accepting it.

So the bible is "so old & outdated" but yet u believe THIS part, that Jesus was a real man? But nothing much else, and everything wrapped around this ONE man, told by this book is fairytale? He is the only man to walk on water, because he is the only by God's hand, he wanted to walk on water, just like he is the only man he allowed to be crucified and then breathed eternal life into him, yet let him walk the earth again.

There is actual science and TONS of books that imply that jesus was a man. Can you find TONS of books referring to noah? can you find TONS of books that refer to adam and eve? no, just a couple. Also, you only continue to believe he walked on water because its what your fabled story book tells you. Were you there? Guess what, i just saw my mom walk on water too! Who are you to say i didnt, you werent there! See your reasoning? You guys keep missing the biggest thing about having a debate, the burden proof lies on those making the claim.

Finally, again do u want to call the bible literature or history...u said it. History IS FACT!

I provide quotes and links for all of my arguments, almost every time. Please, PLEASE, point out to me where i said 'History is Fact'. You cant, because it didnt happen.

People believe it the same way they believe what was written about how George Washington talked, looked, & was, because it was written by people who knew him, knew of him, & from that time frame. To say now, that so much time has passed, that those that still believe this piece of history (u said that right) r afraid of the future or cling to outdated ideals is absurd. We believe it to be our human history like any other. And is it still outdated to have a man near on one knee to propose to his bride to be? God I would hope not. I hope the younger generations still cherish some ideals as ones like God's love ....everlasting!

Some might say that engagement practices are outdated, but it really doesn't matter does it? People don't use engagement as a tool for mass control, oppression of rights or murder. Try again. The bible teaches us about where we came from, the way we thought a long time ago, how we evolved from our previous ways of faith, civilization, ignorance and intelligence, ugliness and beauty, all in one. It is NOT fact, far less so than a history textbook, which is already questionable enough as it is. So even if i DID reference to the bible as fact due to being a form of history (which i didnt) would i rather trust 'textbook' thats 10 years old? Or 2000 years old?

Your beliefs ARE outdated. Very few of you use your faith as ONLY a tool for the good, and for leading a good life. MOST of you, use it as a tool for war. As a means to strike fear into those that are not intelligent enough to make their own decisions, take responsibility for their own actions, or even understand how many serious holes in your 'logic' there are.

I am more than willing to continue to post, quote, link, and continue to break your argument apart piece by piece if needed. This post is a direct example. I have addressed everything you have said. How will you respond? I expect more dodging, more circles. It lost its fun for a bit, but i admit, you have rekindled me slightly.

I agree, Klosetking is very confused. He's the "protege" Mindphuk lol lol

Oh, more insults. No surprise there eh?

 

[Padawanbater2]

My claims are founded in bedrock. I have physical, fossil and tangible evidence, what do you have?. You got nothing-nothing.

No, what you have are novice critical thinking skills.

I'm not even sure you know what you're claiming.

The traditional route creationists take is sidestepping the science and going straight with faith "god works in mysterious ways".. For one to claim the science confirms the biblical account of creation, it's just laughably stupid because it means one of two things; a. The person has no basic understanding of science, and b. Their god actively deceives us by giving us inaccurate measurements, inconsistent with an all loving god.

The science, that is every single piece, supports and confirms evolutionary theory. It is fact.

 

[BrotherBuz]

mankind didnt appear until half a billion years after the cambrian explosion thats hardly all of a sudden...

What I mean by sudden is this:

Evolutionists claim that it took millions and millions of years for mankind to evolve. But if this is true, then there should be "transitional links" that precedes the appearance of mankind in the fossil record.

Transitional fossils (popularly termed missing links) are the fossilized remains of intermediary forms of life that illustrate an evolutionary transition. The missing links hasn't been found, because it does not exist. lol lol

 

[ginjawarrior]

What I mean by sudden is this:

Evolutionists claim that it took millions and millions of years for mankind to evolve. But if this is true, then there should be "transitional links" that precedes the appearance of mankind in the fossil record. The missing links hasn't been found!! lol lol

keep up kid

 

[KlosetKing]

What I mean by sudden is this:

Evolutionists claim that it took millions and millions of years for mankind to evolve. But if this is true, then there should be "transitional links" that precedes the appearance of mankind in the fossil record. The missing links hasn't been found!! lol lol

Omg, im so tired of hearing this. We could find 1000 missing links, and that last link would be missing a toe or some shit and you guys would continue to say that the links just arent there. Someday i hope you come to accept the opposable thumb as a pretty damn big hint.

[video]http://www.myvidster.com/video/316851[/video]

"Things do not exist simply because you say they do... THUS SAYETH THE GREAT CREATURE IN THE SKY!"

 

[KlosetKing]

keep up kid

NO NO NO. Dont you get it? Wheres the link between N and O? Pfft. Not enough links yet ;D

 

[budlover13]

Hey all.

I gotta admit that BrotherBuz has got tenacity. Pitbull is fitting. I admire conviction and heart. I've unsubscribed to this thread 4 times now, but keep seeing it pop up and wonder how it isn't up in flames by now. Y'all are doing a great job. Lot's of heart and minimal personal attacks. Keep it up guys. Intelligent debate and discussion is the only way to get us(society) out of this mess we find ourselves in.

 

[ChubbySoap]

*waits patiently for the inevitable question of why there are still monkeys if we evolved from them*

 

[BrotherBuz]

The traditional route creationists take is sidestepping the science and going straight with faith "god works in mysterious ways"

Are you kidding me. The fossil record does not support evolution.Got it?

 

[Padawanbater2]

Are you kidding me. The fossil record does not support evolution.Got it?

Explain how.

Everything ever dug up from the ground in fossil form supports evolutionary theory, that is without exception pal.

 

[mindphuk]

Are you kidding me. The fossil record does not support evolution.Got it?

Does too. Naw naw naw.

See I can play that game too but it doesn't help anyone learn anything.

That's all you seem to do is making broad assertions without evidence. Your trite link to a creationist website notwithstanding, you have yet to show any evidence for ANY claim you have made in this thread. Your opposition, however, has given ample evidence which you have yet to refute.

The fossil record goes from simple organisms to complex. Your link even confirms that.

Why not try to act like the adult you pretend to be and actually answer objections to your posts without the snide comments. The only thing you have responded to my posts with are insults. Of course, I don't mind as it shows the weakness of your debate skills.

Go ahead, prove we are all wrong about you and answer some of the questions and challenges put forth.

 

[mindphuk]

Explain how.

Everything ever dug up from the ground in fossil form supports evolutionary theory, that is without exception pal.

He does this tactic so you keep asking questions, hopefully forgetting that he hasn't answered the ones you asked earlier.

 

[KlosetKing]

Isaiah 11:12
And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.

Revelation 7:1
And after these things I saw four angels standing on four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree.

Daniel 4:11
The tree grew, and was strong, and the height thereof reached unto heaven, and the sight thereof to the ends of all the earth.

There are more, if you would like, that plainly describe the end of the earth, JUST as vaguely as the ONE passage refers to a circle:
"He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers. He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in."

So we have 10 verses that are all basically just as detailed as one another. Nine of them refer to the earth as being 2 dimensional in a way. One of them refers to a circle of no descriptive form. So you are using the minority vote of your book?

So you can say that even though 9 things say otherwise, the 1 phrase means its true. You do the same here. All of the parts of evolution don't matter, the one part you don't understand means its false. But, all but ONE phrase calls the earth, in so many words, flat? You cant just flip your logic like that.

There are hundreds, nay thousands of fossils, studies, teeth, visual and dna evidence to support it, but you go and find the ONE thing that doesn't add up as nicely as the rest does (sad thing is it does, you just dont understand it).

So is religion really about just believing the improbable? Having faith in luck? You're argument about the sphere is that they said it ONCE, even though it was contradicted in multiple other places in the very same 'book'. Yet you are assuming the ONE part of evolution that doesn't make sense to you (even though it does to everyone else) means it is all a fallacy, even tho the rest of it backs it up.

Your are a mind boggler for sure.

 

[KlosetKing]

He does this tactic so you keep asking questions, hopefully forgetting that he hasn't answered the ones you asked earlier.

EXACTLY! It is so freaking common its not even funny. These guys truly must have a fuckin handbook somewhere.

Google 'how to disprove evolution'. Their kind actually have writeups as to how to debate the topic. Tactics on how to avoid certain questions, and tips on how to twist words against their opponent (debater).

 

[BrotherBuz]

Omg, im so tired of hearing this. We could find 1000 missing links, and that last link would be missing a toe or some shit and you guys would continue to say that the links just arent there. Someday i hope you come to accept the opposable thumb as a pretty damn big hint.
[video]http://www.myvidster.com/video/316851[/video]

Your problem is this. You don't understand the meaning of "transitional links".


You remind me of a person who has lived in a cave, chained to the wall, since birth. Someone comes along and leads you out of the cave, into the sun. The light is too bright, so back into the cave you go, watching shadows on the wall, thinking its reality. That's sad lol lol

 

[KlosetKing]

Oh i fully understand the idea of transitional links. You will just never have enough of them. There is a difference.

It's funny that you of all people would say that i'm the one in the dark. You have provided the least amount of actual data to back up your arguments than anyone. The one person who came in here and defended you provided a post that was 10x the quality of anything you have said yet, and it still didn't have any real links, citations, or data.

 

[BrotherBuz]

These guys truly must have a fuckin handbook somewhere.

Google 'how to disprove evolution'. Their kind actually have writeups as to how to debate the topic. Tactics on how to avoid certain questions, and tips on how to twist words against their opponent (debater).

You better put the bong down bro . . . lol lol lol

 

[KlosetKing]

You better put the bong down bro . . . lol lol lol

More quality debate.