The Ruiner
Well-Known Member
You got me there...good point on both accounts.no, that's racist^^^^^
You got me there...good point on both accounts.no, that's racist^^^^^
Check out My signatureA liar? come now, why?
Bunch of useless meandering might as well just cut all your Lying crap out.
tell me an interpretation in which a slave had an equal opportunity in life as the person that owned them then..1. your misinterpretation.
so, tell me how blacks today would be better off providing free labor then..2 true. Only you took it out of context.
your statement would only be true if you used the proper qualifier, i.e. "some". "some founding fathers didn't own slaves" is a true statement, but "the founding fathers did not own slaves" is a completely false statement, a lie..3 more true than saying they did, we went over this, I said they didnt because you said they did, both preposterous statements but one less by 2/3.
we can go back and forth about how to define a 'founding father', but at least 15 of them had plenty of slaves. i'm sure many of the rest had house slaves (not plantation slaves)..4 your statement was "the ff owned slaves" which is preposterous considering you are misleading in your claim, only 1/3 did buck.
LOL!I did not lie once.
i asked a question: is ron paul a turtle fucker?You claim that Ron Paul fucks turtles with your rhetoric, on top of many others, you are the only liar here buck.
YOu are a Liar and a Racist one at that
HEY CHECK OUT MY SIGNATURE
you do not get how logic works.My statement is more than 2/3 correct
UB's statement is less than 1/3 correct
If you and I were in a Bar together and you tried to pull this Shit on a betThe founding fathers didnt allow slavery or police it, it just was, there is nothing incorrect in my statement, more than 2/3 of the founding fathers didnt own slaves, with most not believing in it at the end of their days, but lets not focus on that.
Get it through and interpret slavery in general as i have already brought up.
he never made a wager with you.Check out my sig
Now Check out what you just wrote
You are Wrong Apologize for being a total dick about it. Make amens by actually reading a History book
And resign as moderator as you are Obligated to do under the terms of our wager
cool it on the violence.If you and I were in a Bar together and you tried to pull this Shit on a bet
You be getting your azz kicked right now while i am taking your money off the bar
Is this a bet?he never made a wager with you.
.cool it on the violence.
i have to go make clones now. please, try to keep it civil.
that goes for two people specifically.
i looked at the thread, he never accepted a bet with you.Is this a bet?
Followed by actions to secure his part of the bet?
Yeah its always a bet until you realize you are about to lose
perlite in a 9 oz cup with rooting powder..
Tap water Small container
4-5 days roots growing out the stem
Forget all the Bullshit It works
Then maybe its the Special tomatoe Plant I am working withperlite in a 9 oz cup with rooting powder.
i've done that method before for kicks, no roots after two weeks.
This is an old conversation and i already explained myself thoroughly and have been agreed with and concurred with and kudosed.tell me an interpretation in which a slave had an equal opportunity in life as the person that owned them then.
so, tell me how blacks today would be better off providing free labor then.
I dont even know where to start with this one, first off, i already explained it to you, you were the first to say "the founding fathers owned slaves" which is preposterous because you were misleading by not stating SOME of the founding fathers owned slaves, you took the initiative first.Therefore your statement was misleading, lie, and preposterous to the degree of your statement being less than 1/3 correct. I then replied with "the founding fathers didnt own slaves" which is preposterous because i didnt say MOST didnt own slaves, do you get it? i was pulling what you were polling, and even though, i was still more correct than you. More than 2/3 correct vs less than 1/3 correct both preposterous, my preposterous statement was mirroring you. But still not as bad for the fact you were far more misleading than i, lie!your statement would only be true if you used the proper qualifier, i.e. "some". "some founding fathers didn't own slaves" is a true statement, but "the founding fathers did not own slaves" is a completely false statement, a lie.
we can review the difference between "for some" and "for all" statements again, if you want.
we can go back and forth about how to define a 'founding father', but at least 15 of them had plenty of slaves. i'm sure many of the rest had house slaves (not plantation slaves).
LOL!LOL!
Ron paul is not a turtle fucker your own poll states this, so LIE! (the people never spoke in your favor lie again)i asked a question: is ron paul a turtle fucker?
the people have spoken.