trayvan martin

A

angelsbandit

Well-Known Member
What's up with these- where is your outrage? Nothing said when the punks are black.

The white apologists, and racist blacks on here have had nothing to say about the hate crimes committed by blacks, but anything involving a black being killed, or harmed by a white - no matter what the facts are you are up in arms.

Racism is alive in America, and plenty of it starts in black communities. Until this kind of bullshit is recognised, and dealt with fear and hatred will continue to separate the races.

.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ufsAfYUfJA&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x017zexYdVA&feature=related
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/07/tourist-beaten-robbed-baltimore-caught-camera-video_n_1409900.html
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/03/29/florida-teen-faces-life-sentence-in-slaying-british-tourists/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iF0N1QoRjlA&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-R-lOGx3Mc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKSpnfyN6sI&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRhaoWWKE-k&feature=related
 
Carne Seca

Carne Seca

Well-Known Member
You keep forgetting one thing. They. Went. To. Trial. (or will go to trial once caught) You assholes keep trying to make this a racial issue. It isn't. It's a justice issue. Keep trotting out your fucking examples but they share one thing in common that Trayvon's case doesn't. They saw the inside of a court room.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Carne Seca said:
You keep forgetting one thing. They. Went. To. Trial. (or will go to trial once caught) You assholes keep trying to make this a racial issue. It isn't. It's a justice issue. Keep trotting out your fucking examples but they share one thing in common that Trayvon's case doesn't. They saw the inside of a court room.
Click to expand...
If you want to blame anything, I'd blame the legislative combo of the 2nd Amendment with SYG, that's the real reason this hasn't hit a court room. Its not cos some brown guy killed some black guy, as much as you'd like that.

EDIT: Btw I'll say brown if I want, it's not racist, people call me white, and if people want to call me by my skin colour, in the interest of "equality" and "parity" I'll do the same. Thanks.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
If you want to blame anything, I'd blame the legislative combo of the 2nd Amendment with SYG, that's the real reason this hasn't hit a court room. Its not cos some brown guy killed some black guy, as much as you'd like that.

EDIT: Btw I'll say brown if I want, it's not racist, people call me white, and if people want to call me by my skin colour, in the interest of "equality" and "parity" I'll do the same. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Terrific combo!
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
If you want to blame anything, I'd blame the legislative combo of the 2nd Amendment with SYG, that's the real reason this hasn't hit a court room. Its not cos some brown guy killed some black guy, as much as you'd like that.

EDIT: Btw I'll say brown if I want, it's not racist, people call me white, and if people want to call me by my skin colour, in the interest of "equality" and "parity" I'll do the same. Thanks.
Click to expand...
You notice the government is never happy unless they decide who lives and dies. They dont have a problem killing piles of people though.
 
afrawfraw

afrawfraw

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
American fuck yeah! No1 at the Ultimate keyboard warrior world championships!
Click to expand...
afrawfraw said:
Not likely. My guess is he'll be shot in his home in a couple years as retaliation. Personally, I'd rather do a few years. I knew a boy who was killed in a similar way. He was running from cops, jumped a fence, and was shot by the home owner trying to cross the back lawn. The police ruled it justified because the suspect entered the property and approached the owner quickly. All good right? A year later the old man was shot 11 times in his home...Hmmm...Wonder why?
Click to expand...
http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/news-national/20120407/US.Oklahoma.Shooting.Spree/?cid=hero_media

'Nuff said.
 
afrawfraw

afrawfraw

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
I'll raise your 'Ready.gov" with a heaping of 'A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.'

You have a pair of threes, I have a royal flush.
Click to expand...
bundee1 said:
I got a pair of nuts, in your mouth.

The only time a full house beats a royal flush.
Click to expand...
So black men walking through your neighborhood is a threat to the safety of the STATE!?

Meaning of "well regulated militia"

The term "regulated" means "disciplined" or "trained".[SUP][113][/SUP] In Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that "[t]he adjective 'well-regulated' implies nothing more than the imposition of proper discipline and training."[SUP][114][/SUP]Regarding a well regulated militia, Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist No. 29:
A tolerable expertness in military movements is a business that requires time and practice. It is not a day, or even a week, that will suffice for the attainment of it. To oblige the great body of the yeomanry, and of the other classes of the citizens, to be under arms for the purpose of going through military exercises and evolutions, as often as might be necessary to acquire the degree of perfection which would entitle them to the character of a well-regulated militia, would be a real grievance to the people, and a serious public inconvenience and loss.[SUP][47][/SUP]
​
Regarding regulation and training of the militia, Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist No. 29:
"If a well regulated militia be the most natural defence of a free country, it ought certainly to be under the regulation and at the disposal of that body which is constituted the guardian of the national security...confiding the regulation of the militia to the direction of the national authority...(and) reserving to the states...the authority of training the militia".[SUP][47]

Taken from Wiki. Don't dismiss the info, as all sources are sited on this Wiki page. Zimm was NOT,NOT,NOT well trained, OBVIOUSLY!

Please research your sources before throwing them at me. And please explain how a "Well trained militia man" can't even keep his cool for a day at work.

Not to mention the fact that he was instructed BY HIS STATE to BACK THE FUCK OFF!
[/SUP]
​
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
afrawfraw said:
So black men walking through your neighborhood is a threat to the safety of the STATE!?

Meaning of "well regulated militia"

The term "regulated" means "disciplined" or "trained".[SUP][113][/SUP] In Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that "[t]he adjective 'well-regulated' implies nothing more than the imposition of proper discipline and training."[SUP][114][/SUP]Regarding a well regulated militia, Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist No. 29:
A tolerable expertness in military movements is a business that requires time and practice. It is not a day, or even a week, that will suffice for the attainment of it. To oblige the great body of the yeomanry, and of the other classes of the citizens, to be under arms for the purpose of going through military exercises and evolutions, as often as might be necessary to acquire the degree of perfection which would entitle them to the character of a well-regulated militia, would be a real grievance to the people, and a serious public inconvenience and loss.[SUP][47][/SUP]
​
Regarding regulation and training of the militia, Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist No. 29:
"If a well regulated militia be the most natural defence of a free country, it ought certainly to be under the regulation and at the disposal of that body which is constituted the guardian of the national security...confiding the regulation of the militia to the direction of the national authority...(and) reserving to the states...the authority of training the militia".[SUP][47]

Taken from Wiki. Don't dismiss the info, as all sources are sited on this Wiki page. Zimm was NOT,NOT,NOT well trained, OBVIOUSLY!

Please research your sources before throwing them at me. And please explain how a "Well trained militia man" can't even keep his cool for a day at work.

Not to mention the fact that he was instructed BY HIS STATE to BACK THE FUCK OFF!
[/SUP]
​
Click to expand...
Your argument has no merit, you don't even know what you are arguing about. No one is talking about a militia here.

The second amendment doesn't guarantee you the right to have firearms, it makes the government POWERLESS to make any law depriving you of that right.

Your original argument was That no where is it written that you are to arm yourself and protect your neighborhood,like everything you do is written down somewhere that allows you to do it. Where does it say you are allowed to shit? Pick your nose? Trim your toenails? It doesn't, because laws don't tell you what you can do, they tell you what you can't do.


BTW he was never instructed to "back off". Unless you think " We don't need you to do that " is some kind of command and that dispatchers have even 1 ounce of authority.

Because of the 2nd amendment, American citizens can arm themselves in order to protect life and property without worry that the government would ever have the authority to do take that away from them.
 
Mindmelted

Mindmelted

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
Your argument has no merit, you don't even know what you are arguing about. No one is talking about a militia here.

The second amendment doesn't guarantee you the right to have firearms, it makes the government POWERLESS to make any law depriving you of that right.

Your original argument was That no where is it written that you are to arm yourself and protect your neighborhood,like everything you do is written down somewhere that allows you to do it. Where does it say you are allowed to shit? Pick your nose? Trim your toenails? It doesn't, because laws don't tell you what you can do, they tell you what you can't do.


BTW he was never instructed to "back off". Unless you think " We don't need you to do that " is some kind of command and that dispatchers have even 1 ounce of authority.

Because of the 2nd amendment, American citizens can arm themselves in order to protect life and property without worry that the government would ever have the authority to do take that away from them.
Click to expand...


:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Carne Seca said:
I don't care if he walks away a free man. As long as it goes to trial that's o.k. with me.
Click to expand...
Good to see you put so much faith in the judicial system. All that bitching and moaning and all you want is it to go to trial? Typical liberal, ideological fountain completely unbased in common sense (or even reality).

So even if it transpires Zimmerman was the first brown KKK member who killed Martin intentionally, if he gets a "not guilty" it's fine as long as it goes to court?

Are you having a giraffe?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top