49 million to five

Grow4Daze

Member
Every seedling is a marijuana plant...right? Even the ones that are just on their 1st embryonic leaves.
That's a very valid point. When is a plant a plant?

I see a plant with every seed I put in the ground. Is it a plant when it gets it's first taproot? Is it not a plant before the sprout comes out of the top of the rockwool?
I believe a plant is a plant at whatever stage of development it may be in.
Same with people. Now if my garden gets raped by "weeds", I have no problem pulling a little sprout out of the ground and tossing it away.
I don't want someone telling me I have to let the "weed" grow in my ganja garden and then transplant to another garden.

I'm liberal in the aspect of allowing the practice to continue if the need is warranted. But I disagree that children should be treated like a tumor or growth to be excised because it's inconvenient.

But damn. That's a lot of babies that could have become taxpayers to help fix our current social security issues. NO wonder they keep letting illegals in. Once they legalize them all, we'll have made up for maybe half of missing taxpayer money.
 

jeff f

New Member
we absolutely dont need more population that much im certain of.

wow! oh wonderess god of all knowledge can you please tell us what the ideal world population is. that way we can start knocking off people who go over YOUR limit.

just thinking out loud here but maybe stoning is a good way to kill all the "extras" should be the way to go....sorta like the old classic "the lottery". that way we dont emit any co2 into the air when the rifles go off.

i am diggin be a liberal. this is sorta fun...what time does the next sermon start?
 
P

PadawanBater

Guest
wow! oh wonderess god of all knowledge can you please tell us what the ideal world population is. that way we can start knocking off people who go over YOUR limit.

just thinking out loud here but maybe stoning is a good way to kill all the "extras" should be the way to go....sorta like the old classic "the lottery". that way we dont emit any co2 into the air when the rifles go off.

i am diggin be a liberal. this is sorta fun...what time does the next sermon start?
Lay off the moonshine.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
answer the question, what is the ideal world population?

you guys are the ones telling us there are too many people.

exactly how many is too many?

it all depends on what standard you accept on quality of life..
american standard = 1.5 billion
european = 4 billion
chinese = 7 billion
sudan = 15 billion

note that there are 7 billion alive right now...
 

jeff f

New Member
it all depends on what standard you accept on quality of life..
american standard = 1.5 billion
european = 4 billion
chinese = 7 billion
sudan = 15 billion

note that there are 7 billion alive right now...
looks like we only have to kill 5.5 billion then. being as most of the worlds problems are coming from the middle east i suggest we start there.

then we can cut off all medical supplies being sent to africa, south america, and canada...:clap:

bombing commences in 5, 4, 3....


you probably dont get it but most of the people reading your post are a little shocked right now.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
We need only get the world govt.'s to disassociate themselves from Socialism and Communism, then there will be enough for everyone.

It's a matter of efficiency, not population control.

S & C are NOT efficient.
 
P

PadawanBater

Guest
answer the question, what is the ideal world population?

you guys are the ones telling us there are too many people.

exactly how many is too many?
"you guys"? Who does that refer to? Another generalization? I'm guessing you mean liberals again..

But lets just think about it, there are almost 7 Billion people alive today, and the number increases exponentially each year, meaning the rate at which the population increases is faster this year than last year, and next year it will be faster than this year. This trend has been constant throughout human history (except when catastrophe's happen, I think the black plague might have shifted the rate of increase, but I'm not sure, WW2 same deal).

more than half - that is 3.5 Billion people - live on less than $2/day. I just read a statistic yesterday that said 17% of people living in Yemen survived on less than $1.37/day last year.

Another statistic I've heard said if every person on the planet lived like an American, we would need 14 Earths to sustain it with the current population. So ginja's post is pretty relevant;

it all depends on what standard you accept on quality of life..
american standard = 1.5 billion
european = 4 billion
chinese = 7 billion
sudan = 15 billion

note that there are 7 billion alive right now...
...and looks like a pretty decent assessment to me. It all depends on how you live. The more people there are, the less quality of life for those that are here, as there will be more competition for resources. Seems like common sense to me.

But it definitely doesn't have to be this way, and I'm not advocating limiting kids for couples or any of that. I'm advocating creating enormous food producing stations all over the country, then later all over the world. Let science advance and take the next step into mass agricultural production to feed the worlds population. I've got the plans and we've already got the means to accomplish that goal.

Guess what's holding us back... again?

https://www.rollitup.org/spirituality-sexuality-philosophy/252681-atheism-133.html

:wall::wall::wall:
 

fatfarmer

Active Member
I don't like it,but Iam a man not woman so how can i tell her what to do. those who do will live with it, those who don't, got milk?
 

jeff f

New Member
]"you guys"? Who does that refer to? Another generalization? I'm guessing you mean liberals again..[/COLOR]

But lets just think about it, there are almost 7 Billion people alive today, and the number increases exponentially each year, meaning the rate at which the population increases is faster this year than last year, and next year it will be faster than this year. This trend has been constant throughout human history (except when catastrophe's happen, I think the black plague might have shifted the rate of increase, but I'm not sure, WW2 same deal).

more than half - that is 3.5 Billion people - live on less than $2/day. I just read a statistic yesterday that said 17% of people living in Yemen survived on less than $1.37/day last year.

Another statistic I've heard said if every person on the planet lived like an American, we would need 14 Earths to sustain it with the current population. So ginja's post is pretty relevant;



...and looks like a pretty decent assessment to me. It all depends on how you live. The more people there are, the less quality of life for those that are here, as there will be more competition for resources. Seems like common sense to me.

But it definitely doesn't have to be this way, and I'm not advocating limiting kids for couples or any of that. I'm advocating creating enormous food producing stations all over the country, then later all over the world. Let science advance and take the next step into mass agricultural production to feed the worlds population. I've got the plans and we've already got the means to accomplish that goal.

Guess what's holding us back... again?

https://www.rollitup.org/spirituality-sexuality-philosophy/252681-atheism-133.html

:wall::wall::wall:

1 uumm "you guys" yep libs...you got it

2 thanks for explaining what exponentially means. most of us had no idea...:dunce:

3 conservatives like to call them farms. we have them "all over the country". you really should get out more. somebody already stole "your plan" and implemnted it a couple hundred years ago. this country alone produces enough food to feed over half the worlds population and currently feeds about one quarter of it.

the rest we BURN AS FUEL because "you guys" told us the earth has a fever which caused massive price increases of anything corn based. you might have read, it caused riots in struggling nations...remember THE POOR PEOPLE "YOU GUYS" CLAIM TO LOVE.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
looks like we only have to kill 5.5 billion then. being as most of the worlds problems are coming from the middle east i suggest we start there.

then we can cut off all medical supplies being sent to africa, south america, and canada...:clap:

bombing commences in 5, 4, 3....


you probably dont get it but most of the people reading your post are a little shocked right now.
that is based on food production at the moment
i in no way advocate the bombing of other countries although it is not a surprise at all that you immediately think of it. and not only that but you picked muslims to be exterminated brilliant that.....
 
P

PadawanBater

Guest
1 uumm "you guys" yep libs...you got it

2 thanks for explaining what exponentially means. most of us had no idea...:dunce:

3 conservatives like to call them farms. we have them "all over the country". you really should get out more. somebody already stole "your plan" and implemnted it a couple hundred years ago. this country alone produces enough food to feed over half the worlds population and currently feeds about one quarter of it.

the rest we BURN AS FUEL because "you guys" told us the earth has a fever which caused massive price increases of anything corn based. you might have read, it caused riots in struggling nations...remember THE POOR PEOPLE "YOU GUYS" CLAIM TO LOVE.
Dude, you gotta find something to bitch about in every post I make don't you? :finger:

I'm clearly not talking about farms jeff. And I'm also not claiming this idea is some groundbreaking innovation that'll change the course of human history... It (again) seems like common sense to me...

Build enormous structures miles high, yes, MILES high that support mass food production. Build them everywhere. Don't you think something like that would be a much better investment than going and wasting Billions per day on wars that kill innocent people?

The quote I bolded is probably the stupidest thing I've seen you post. That's so obviously false I can't even imagine how someone would think it's accurate.

(rofl at "a couple hundred years ago" - go check wiki and come back and tell me when agriculture got started...)
 

jeff f

New Member
Dude, you gotta find something to bitch about in every post I make don't you? :finger:

I'm clearly not talking about farms jeff. And I'm also not claiming this idea is some groundbreaking innovation that'll change the course of human history... It (again) seems like common sense to me...

Build enormous structures miles high, yes, MILES high that support mass food production. Build them everywhere. Don't you think something like that would be a much better investment than going and wasting Billions per day on wars that kill innocent people?

The quote I bolded is probably the stupidest thing I've seen you post. That's so obviously false I can't even imagine how someone would think it's accurate.

(rofl at "a couple hundred years ago" - go check wiki and come back and tell me when agriculture got started...)
we have now officially entered the twilight zone.

1. yes, great idea. that way when the terrorists fly planes into our "gardens" the whole world will starve...seriously...this has got to be a troll or i want to know what you grew that made you think that even makes sense.

2 the garden of eden? you cannot be this stupid. AGRICULTURE, THATS HOW THEY ATE BEFORE WALMART FOOD CENTER WAS INVENTED...:clap::clap::clap::clap:

dude, seriiously...stay in school bud. you have a long way to go...
 

jrh72582

Well-Known Member
How about churches no longer being tax free if they want to try to dictate how tax dollars are spent?:twisted:
AMEN! This abortion business is ridiculous as well. These same anti-choice radicals are the first to throw a fit when any other perceived liberty or choice is taken away. We see through your pathos-riddled arguments. Everyone outside of the church does, so keep your kool-aid there, please.
 

jrh72582

Well-Known Member
1 uumm "you guys" yep libs...you got it

2 thanks for explaining what exponentially means. most of us had no idea...:dunce:

3 conservatives like to call them farms. we have them "all over the country". you really should get out more. somebody already stole "your plan" and implemnted it a couple hundred years ago. this country alone produces enough food to feed over half the worlds population and currently feeds about one quarter of it.

the rest we BURN AS FUEL because "you guys" told us the earth has a fever which caused massive price increases of anything corn based. you might have read, it caused riots in struggling nations...remember THE POOR PEOPLE "YOU GUYS" CLAIM TO LOVE.
Get out of here with this 'you guys' stuff. You're merely exposing your lack of education. Ever hear of false dilemma buddy? You get worse every day, so please take your fanaticism elsewhere. We don't want your pamphlets - we're tired of your bullhorn.
 

ChChoda

Well-Known Member
Get out of here with this 'you guys' stuff. You're merely exposing your lack of education. Ever hear of false dilemma buddy? You get worse every day, so please take your fanaticism elsewhere.We don't want your pamphlets - we're tired of your bullhorn.
Say what? :bigjoint:
 

jrh72582

Well-Known Member
Say what? :bigjoint:
He's on here screaming and name-calling all day, every day. He resorts to fallacy in an attempt to insult in every other post. I'm trying to goad him to calm down and engage in civilized discourse before he alienates everyone.
 
Top