AG Garland appoints special counsel

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
This could be my ignorance showing, but if Garland (who is on record as being a defender of the rule of law) wanted to score high on the Richter scale, he might have nominated more special prosecutors.

1) Jack Smith on the document theft and insurrection
2) someone tasked with co-conspirators in the legislature
3) associated crimes at the departmental level, notably Postal Service (remember the wrecked mail counters?) and Secret Service (erasure of communications on the 5th and 6th), maybe DOD with the sabotage of national guard response …
4) dismemberment of CDC and firing of various inspectors-general
5) Supreme Court justices lying at their confirmation hearings
Jack already has two teams working under him and could create more as the evidence dictates, it depends on how many rat out others among other things. He could hand off crimes to other parts of the DOJ, or create a team to investigate and prosecute. Jack is kinda the head of a special department with its own eventual organization, depending on how big it gets and how far it goes. After Trump is gone for the docs, the focus will be on J6, Trump, his cronies, minions and allies in congress.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
This could be my ignorance showing, but if Garland (who is on record as being a defender of the rule of law) wanted to score high on the Richter scale, he might have nominated more special prosecutors.

1) Jack Smith on the document theft and insurrection
2) someone tasked with co-conspirators in the legislature
3) associated crimes at the departmental level, notably Postal Service (remember the wrecked mail counters?) and Secret Service (erasure of communications on the 5th and 6th), maybe DOD with the sabotage of national guard response …
4) dismemberment of CDC and firing of various inspectors-general
5) Supreme Court justices lying at their confirmation hearings
while i am eternally doubtful about the proper application of justice, i have to hope that there are already investigations going on into all of those items, and that Garland will either oversee them himself, or that Smith was just the first announcement of a few...or many...
 

Offmymeds

Well-Known Member
This could be my ignorance showing, but if Garland (who is on record as being a defender of the rule of law) wanted to score high on the Richter scale, he might have nominated more special prosecutors.

1) Jack Smith on the document theft and insurrection
2) someone tasked with co-conspirators in the legislature
3) associated crimes at the departmental level, notably Postal Service (remember the wrecked mail counters?) and Secret Service (erasure of communications on the 5th and 6th), maybe DOD with the sabotage of national guard response …
4) dismemberment of CDC and firing of various inspectors-general
5) Supreme Court justices lying at their confirmation hearings
He was given prosecutorial powers. I would think it would be a normal matter to hand each one off to another prosecutor but I have no idea.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

Katyal: I Expect Trump Will Be Indicted By This Special Counsel
466,110 views Nov 21, 2022
Former President Trump will be the subject of a second special counsel investigation, this one focused on his handling of classified documents found at his Mar-a-Lago home and “key aspects” of the investigation into his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, Attorney General Merrick Garland said Friday. Former Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal joins Morning Joe to discuss.
 

GoatSoup

Well-Known Member
I'm hoping Jack has asked the lead investigarors on the case to write up their inditements and cite the evidence they have proving the case, so that he can evaluate their cases. Then make what ever changes he thinks best, and charge him on Thanksgiving so we can all celebrate a Happy Thanksgiving.
 

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
This could be my ignorance showing, but if Garland (who is on record as being a defender of the rule of law) wanted to score high on the Richter scale, he might have nominated more special prosecutors.

1) Jack Smith on the document theft and insurrection
2) someone tasked with co-conspirators in the legislature
3) associated crimes at the departmental level, notably Postal Service (remember the wrecked mail counters?) and Secret Service (erasure of communications on the 5th and 6th), maybe DOD with the sabotage of national guard response …
4) dismemberment of CDC and firing of various inspectors-general
5) Supreme Court justices lying at their confirmation hearings
I'm no expert on special prosecutors but I assumed Mr. Smith will have a staff of assistants, no?

Did not Mueller have guys under him doing some/most of the grunt work?

These prosecutors can't do this all by themselves I wouldn't think. But never having been investigated, what do I know?
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
I'm no expert on special prosecutors but I assumed Mr. Smith will have a staff of assistants, no?

Did not Mueller have guys under him doing some/most of the grunt work?

These prosecutors can't do this all by themselves I wouldn't think. But never having been investigated, what do I know?
same here, and same here.

Since I am an optimist, I’d like to think this frees Garland up to go after more elusive game, like the billionaires who funded sedition.
 
Last edited:

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

MAGA Allies Freak Out As New Prosecutor Eyes Trump Crimes

58,693 views Nov 22, 2022
The appointment of Special Counsel Jack Smith to take over Trump’s criminal investigations is sparking debate among legal experts. Former U.S. Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal joins “The Beat” saying he doesn’t think Attorney General Garland had to do it -- because it might “reward Donald Trump for his move of trying to announce his candidacy early to try and head off an investigation.” The appointment is also predictably triggering many on the right with MAGA ally Jim Jordan reportedly wanting to investigate the prosecutor.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
it's been suggested that the 1/6th committee could just be transferred to the senate when this congress ends...it can be, kind of.
since it's a different body, they would have to reform the entire committee, but all the materials and evidence would have to be transferred
to the new committee, and it would take them weeks to get going again.

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-can-jan-6-investigation-moved-senate-after-gop-house-win-1761336
They are making everything public anyway from what I can gather, maybe will transfer some stuff to Jack. If they win in Georgia, they will have a clear majority and majorities on committees too, Georgia is important. Dunno what the senate would do with Jack out there ripping the field up, they won't want to get in his way. The J6 committee report should be his roadmap and they will probably write it that way, with Jack on the scene they might make a few changes to point him in the right direction, if required. The senate can't put people in prison, Jack can, so Jack counts more, we already know the truth, or enough of it.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
The DOJ has good reason to believe its investigation—and an indictment—will proceed as planned.

Read in Slate: https://apple.news/ANPfo9QrpSKSvNNRalJUHqg


Yep, Jack won't fuck around, the only thing that might delay indictment would be Herschel's runoff on Dec 6th. The Canon shit will be settled and unless she is mad, she won't stick her nose in again, he has an emergency appeal before her to try and find out who the rats are, good luck with that! If she keeps fucking around in things that are none of her business, she might have to deal with Jack herself one day. The judiciary branch needs better ethics and ways of policing and investigating itself, she, Alito, Thomas and others have proved that.

Indictment day for Donald should be something to see, will he surrender in DC, or will they knock on his door early in the morning, just as he's getting to sleep? :lol:
 
Top