Booze is legal and MJ is not? What a crazy world..

Im not arguing its anti cancer properties. As a matter of fact, my friend and I donated a pound to a dispensary, so they could make us "anointing oil" for his aunt. So I know all about what is potential in cancer research. what I am trying to get across to you(why I dont know) is that smoking mary is not harm free. I dont smoke cigarettes, and cough up shit all the time, ESPECIALLY after vaporizing. (whoever said thc is also an expectorant, I agree) regardless of carcinogens. So, do you think that the tar in the smoke( even in vapor) is
harm free too?(its not) lots of studies out there saying the same thing. you know how to google, right?
Im not hating on the herbature at all. I just know better......

PLEASE show me any study that says its 100% harm free. since we showed you info that contradicts you statement.
Now eating it, as we were intended. I can concur that its harm free, as long as its in its completely natural state.

I did say thc was an expectorant, therefore it renders the tar harm free as it can't accumulate like that of a cigarette smoker.

and YES I know how to google, I use google.com/scholar to get ALL my information.

there is no ONE study that states its 100% harm free, only a cumulation of studies put together the picture that it's harm free when vaporized.

and I don't know of the tar you speak of in vaporizing. cannabinoids to build up upon themselves over so much time and produce an oil, but this is far from tar imho.

and back to the initial point, THC is a powerful expectorant, therefore tar can't accumulate, therefore it cannot do any damage.

Volcano company itself says there is tar in their vapor, its just significantly reduces the amounts. so what is the point of a vaporizer? You yourself are saying, in other words, that we use vaporizers to reduce the effects of smoking mary. effects of what? certainly we arent removing their anti cancer, and "expectorant" properties. So what does a vaporizer reduce then? (i know)

it reduces carcinogens dude. you think I didn't know that or something?

what I"m saying is, the volume of the thc in the vapor outweighs the tar, and the thc being an expectorant totally eliminates tar in the lungs.

so the use of vaporizing can be multiple things, getting rid of tar, getting more thc volume in the vapor, and preventing the release of carcinogens . . .

now seriously, how else do you want to twist my argument? I"m game.

since you STILL cant comprehend what Im saying, Vaporizers reduce what? And why would we reduce these if they didnt have a negative affect? Do you understand yet? You said cannabis is completely harm free, right? Then what in the fark is the point of vaporizing. I wont disagree that smoking PURE thc, thcv, cbd, cbn can be harmless, what I am saying is that the byproduct of smoke, no matter how you want to disagree, is bad for you. Tell me right now that smoke is harmless and we will all understand what goes through your head and ill drop it...lol

oh ok, smoking cannabis is bad because of the carcinogens, there is a very low chance of cancer being caused this way, but if it is caused this way, it will be incurable by cannabinoids because it has mutated against the expression of CB2 receptors.

other than that, it decreases your lung function by 3% (according to that shit on superhighme . . . )

good enough?

dangledo said:

Now your seeing the light. So you agree smoking not vaporizing, contains carcinogens? Now are carcinogens good for you? no. soooooooooo, smoking cannabis is not harmless. You really have a hard on for university studies dont you.
Do you need a university study to tell you carcinogens are not good?
you just dont know any better do you? (ignorance)
oh yea, a quote from a UNIVERSITY STUDY.
"it is possible to vaporize medically active tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) by heating marijuana to a temperature short of the point of combustion, thereby eliminating or substantially reducing potentially harmful smoke toxins that are normally present in marijuana smoke".


bet you respond, just cant help yourself.

Click to expand...

I Love You man

your actually taking the time I gave up on

HoLE said:

I Love You man

your actually taking the time I gave up on

Click to expand...

uh, perhaps you should read the rest of the thread before you act like he beat me or something.

poplars said:

uh, perhaps you should read the rest of the thread before you act like he beat me or something.

Click to expand...

I'm not talkin to you,,,remember what you said,,,,,,Are You Following Me Now

nope, if you didn't notice, I posted on this thread several times so I"m subscribed.

so if that's following I'm sorry the beers have deluded your definitions.