Injunction stays as the original order

batman 24 said:
So what does this mean? I have a valid license and made the deadline, but I moved . So can I grow or do I have to wait until the Feb court date now?
Click to expand...
worse...we have to wait for the result of the Feb hearing...and then all the appeals. hopefully when we get a new appeal if we lose, these "growing pains" will be covered. what a drag to overlook but i didn't think of that angle until after the fact
 
WHATFG said:
Firstly, we are all in this together and "us mmar" peeps are fighting as hard for all patients. Secondly, reasonable access apparently has nothing to do with being affordable. Just because YOU can't afford it doesn't mean your access in impeded.
Click to expand...

"That opinion simply does not square with demonstrable facts on the ground, your Honor, and it is well settled case law that the lack of adequate funds absolutely IS a barrier to 'reasonable access' and in fact the entirety of HC's policy structure is designed more for the profitability of MMAR than for the health of patients- and as such, I hereby formally request this court to nullify said policy and let patients grow for themselves if they want."

THAT is the way to make waves, kids.
 
ttystikk said:
"That opinion simply does not square with demonstrable facts on the ground, your Honor, and it is well settled case law that the lack of adequate funds absolutely IS a barrier to 'reasonable access' and in fact the entirety of HC's policy structure is designed more for the profitability of MMAR than for the health of patients- and as such, I hereby formally request this court to nullify said policy and let patients grow for themselves if they want."

THAT is the way to make waves, kids.
Click to expand...
Amen brother

Peace
 
ttystikk said:
"That opinion simply does not square with demonstrable facts on the ground, your Honor, and it is well settled case law that the lack of adequate funds absolutely IS a barrier to 'reasonable access' and in fact the entirety of HC's policy structure is designed more for the profitability of MMAR than for the health of patients- and as such, I hereby formally request this court to nullify said policy and let patients grow for themselves if they want."

THAT is the way to make waves, kids.
Click to expand...

And where did this come from?
 
torontoke said:
I could never get my dr to even talk about mmj until after the date.
Now he seemed much easier..... coincidence i think not
Click to expand...

So many doctor's despise independence and push corporate dependency at all costs.
Also deep down they now the healing properties of MJ which is a risk to profit.
Its a more powerful anti-viral than anything they can offer and they know it.
All doctors have their place but the promotion of cannabis and feeding your
endocannabinoid system should be on par with the promotion of healthy eating.
Like good ol Hunter S Thompson said marijuana is like grapefruit its part
of an everyday overall health regime.
 
AverageJoe88 said:
Crowns, judges and cops don't want to prosecute a non-violent person with a MMPR script
caught growing for personal use because they can't afford it from an LP.
Just a waste of everyone's time and money.
Eventually we will have the choice to grow or purchase.
I shall accept no other outcome.
Click to expand...
We, as medical users can kill the cultivation laws by open defiance. If everybody just grew what they used for medicine the cops and courts would get tired of arresting and trying cases doomed to fail real quick. The setback is the legal costs for the patients who get to go first. I know section 7 of the charter is used as an argument, but I have a different angle of the Charter and I wonder why it hasn't been used. I'd have to look up the exact wording, but it basically says that "the law must be demonstratively justified in a free and democratic society" . If almost 3/4 of society disagrees with that law, does an arrest under it not violate ones rights?
 
"The reason for seeking the adjournment is because the Smith case ,the BC extracts case in which Kirk Tousaw who is helping in this case is lead counsel, that will consider the same or substantially similar issues ,is now to be heard in the Supreme Court of Canada on March 20th with various due dates during the time set for this case and I am also being asked to help in that case.
It does not make sense for us to proceed in a trial court when the same or similar issues will be considered and decided soon by our highest court for the first time that will provide guidance on the law and maybe the evidence in this lower court case.It will hopefully help define the issues in this case and maybe reduce the court time costs etc
If adjourned we will seek to vary the injunction some way to allow for address changes pending trial. If we do not get the adjournment we will try and call the evidence of the problems experienced by many on this issue since and how they remain in a Parker situation of having to choose between their liberty and their health.We will call the evdence we tried to introduce in the Court of Appeal."
 
AverageJoe88 said:
So many doctor's despise independence and push corporate dependency at all costs.
Also deep down they now the healing properties of MJ which is a risk to profit.
Its a more powerful anti-viral than anything they can offer and they know it.
All doctors have their place but the promotion of cannabis and feeding your
endocannabinoid system should be on par with the promotion of healthy eating.
Like good ol Hunter S Thompson said marijuana is like grapefruit its part
of an everyday overall health regime.
Click to expand...

Agreed on the marijuana is like grapefruit analogy.

Just don't think the actual practitioners of medicine- the doctors, nurses and the like- want to see marijuana stay illegal. Damn near all of them I've spoken to (all in Colorado, so they need not fear persecution for their opinions) said that the sooner it's legal the better!

They aren't big fans of dabs tho- it's tough on the lungs, and producing it is causing these same professionals to see a spike in burn victims- including innocent ones. They are NOT fans of that.

They'd really prefer to see their patients eat pot, and many here will say so on hospital letterhead. Makes getting an extended plant count easier than rolling a joint.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Steep Hill
The Battle of Pesticide Regulation: Florida vs. California
Replies
0
Views
754
Steep Hill
Steep Hill
VIANARCHRIS
9 unauthorized Vancouver pot shops lose appeal, ordered to shut down
Replies
0
Views
356
VIANARCHRIS
VIANARCHRIS
TheOriginalDankmaster
I’m back after 20 years...one of the originals at Overgrow
Replies
3
Views
986
TheOriginalDankmaster
TheOriginalDankmaster
rockethoe
Original sensible seeds store refusing refund on bad seeds. Stay away from them!
Replies
13
Views
1K
CikaBika
CikaBika
Jimdamick
  • Poll Poll
Should the US shed blood for Ukraine
81 82 83
Replies
2K
Views
126K
Budzbuddha
Budzbuddha
Back
Top