Lockdowns don't work.

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
The problem with only conversing with people in such a way that shows your disdain for their intelligence, is that in general, people are not so stupid. Anyone can see that these arguments are left without rebuttal and that the tactics of the house-arrest crowd is to simply drown out the dissent with volume or to distort and deceive. Or worse yet, some frame the discussion as though the person who disagrees should feel guilty or refrain from attacking their position because their grandmother died? Why should anyone care about you when all you do antagonize and troll?

Why even comment if you think that everyone who will read it is stupid? Nobody is saying that you have to go outside.
Click to expand...
i have such disdain for your intelligence

You should feel guilty about and refrain from attacking(!) my position that lockdowns work because my grandma (and 2,000-5,000 other people) died from covid 19 that day

As a person who is militantly staying at home to prevent the spread of a neurotoxic, hepatoxic virus, my only tactic is to silence your dissent by shouting you down with distortion and deception

I am clearly just antagonizing and trolling you when I state that limiting contact with others slows the transmission of a deadly virus.

Thank you for telling me how much I enjoy this on the day my grandmother died
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
So you want proof that antibodies work, even though the presence of antibodies in such a wide portion of the populace is proof that our measures to stop the spread of the virus have failed, utterly.

But you didn't care for proof that our measures would stop the spread of the virus, when economists warned they would cause global economic meltdown and famine?
Click to expand...
but the economy
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
So you want proof that antibodies work, even though the presence of antibodies in such a wide portion of the populace is proof that our measures to stop the spread of the virus have failed, utterly.

But you didn't care for proof that our measures would stop the spread of the virus, when economists warned they would cause global economic meltdown and famine?
Click to expand...
but the economy except in bold and large font size
 
Horselover fat

Horselover fat

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
No they don't.

Scientists are not known for making claims lacking proof. If a scientist made such a claim, they said so tentatively or made it clear it was their opinion. There is no proof of such a claim. It doesn't exist. If it did, someone here would surely have cited it in this very thread. I seek that shit daily. There is no direct evidence that lockdowns are working. There is direct evidence they're causing the worst recession in a century.

That's the elephant in the room.
Click to expand...
Do you understand how viruses spread?
 
Grandpapy

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
Gangelt study: 15% infection; 0.37% fatality rate


Gangelt, Germany has one of the highest rates of infection in the country. Roughly two out of every thirteen there has been infected by SARS-CoV-2.
Click to expand...
So 15% of the population is unaware of the extent of the damage to their Heart and Lungs, I guess we have 10-20 yrs to figure that out.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Grandpapy said:
So 15% of the population is unaware of the extent of the damage to their Heart and Lungs, I guess we have 10-20 yrs to figure that out.
Click to expand...
I'm sure they'll be more worried about the global recession in progress for that long as well, but I'm not convinced that those who are asymptomatic are suffering such heart and lung damage. Anything to cite?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Grandpapy said:
So 15% of the population is unaware of the extent of the damage to their Heart and Lungs, I guess we have 10-20 yrs to figure that out.
Click to expand...
In 10-20 years most of the nonessential people will have been baked into soylent green pizzas to feed the remaining real life sex slaves and the people bred in labs for use in bio experiments to improve the lives of the essential people.

Be essential, or be pizza!
 
Grandpapy

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
I'm sure they'll be more worried about the global recession in progress for that long as well, but I'm not convinced that those who are asymptomatic are suffering such heart and lung damage. Anything to cite?
Click to expand...
"We know that during severe SARS-CoV-2 infection, heart function may decrease. Sometimes this decrease is a consequence of the systemic inflammatory response to infection, and occasionally, in some people, because of direct viral infection in the heart."
newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org

How does COVID-19 affect the heart? - Mayo Clinic News Network

The effects of COVID-19 on the lungs are well-known. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, more information is becoming available about the role the virus, called SARS-CoV-2, has on the heart. "Individuals with known cardiovascular disease are at an increased risk of more severe complications from...
newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org

But we are planning for this in 15 years from now right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top