Open carry in Texas passes

desert dude

Well-Known Member
No. No you won't.



No. No it doesn't. You need to go read up on the term, "percent distribution". Your tiny tiny penis is getting even more tiny, it's nearly the size of your almost non-existent brain.

Your ATF jokes are cute. But only show how prejudice you are. Keep it up dumb dumb.
Yes. Yes, I would.

Why don't you educate the reading public here about percent distribution? You might actually learn what it means in the process.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
The only thing I like about open carry is that it makes plain that citizens have a right to be armed, and that the government has no authority to infringe that right.
I get that view. But I much prefer my right to privacy, including while I'm in public. I like the fact that I can carry with a t-shirt and shorts, and not a single person would know. And on the off chance some dumbshit tries to commit a crime, I will be able to protect people who are unable to protect themselves.

There is an added positive effect too, while driving. It tames my road rage, knowing that I'm packing is enough for me to not rage on dipshit drivers.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
So you admit to shitting on floors too? You condemning it is rather hypocritical, don't you think?
lol, if that's what you think that post says...

I did stupid shit does not mean I shit on floors at public eateries. I also realized how socially fuck-ed up it is to shit on floors of places where the public eats before I hit the age of 4. Wondering about the mental state of a 30 year old who still thinks is just awesome is not the least bit hypocritical. I stopped wiping boogers on my shirt in 1st grade, if I saw a man in his 30's doing it I'd wonder there too.

I'm totally shocked you are defending him and attacking me though. :roll:

Let's let it go and talk about something else though, it's such a downer.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
lol, if that's what you think that post says...

I did stupid shit does not mean I shit on floors at public eateries. I also realized how socially fuck-ed up it is to shit on floors of places where the public eats before I hit the age of 4. Wondering about the mental state of a 30 year old who still thinks is just awesome is not the least bit hypocritical. I stopped wiping boogers on my shirt in 1st grade, if I saw a man in his 30's doing it I'd wonder there too.

I'm totally shocked you are defending him and attacking me though. :roll:

Let's let it go and talk about something else though, it's such a downer.
I'm not defending or attacking in this instance. I merely antagonizing and speculating.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
I'm a pretty good shot. I've been putting quarter sized holes in paper at 15 feet with my Sig 1911 45 pretty consistently. I usually use qualifying targets or police targets.
I am a fair shot, maybe not as good as you.

The frontsight competition is single elimination man-on-man for each class, usually about 30 people per class. Two shooters are each faced with three targets, the one who knocks down all three first, wins. The other guy is eliminated. Rinse and repeat. This goes on till there is only one man standing: me.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
~49% percent distribution among blacks, to ~48% percent distribution of whites. I feel that is pretty clear.
Yes, it is.

Since blacks represent ~12% of the population and whites represent about ~75%, what does that say about the murder rate of blacks V whites?
 

see4

Well-Known Member
I am a fair shot, maybe not as good as you.

The frontsight competition is single elimination man-on-man for each class, usually about 30 people per class. Two shooters are each faced with three targets, the one who knocks down all three first, wins. The other guy is eliminated. Rinse and repeat. This goes on till there is only one man standing: me.
That sounds fun. I've been considering entering a local 3-gun in the area to see how I'd fair. It's stiff competition around here, Arizonans love their guns.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
Yes, it is.

Since blacks represent ~12% of the population and whites represent about ~75%, what does that say about the murder rate of blacks V whites?
No, that's not what that is saying. It's saying, as a relative percentage, 49% of blacks are arrested and charged with murder, while 48% of whites are. It's not relative to each other, it's relative as a percentage of total black people, and white people, respectively.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
Yes, it is.

Since blacks represent ~12% of the population and whites represent about ~75%, what does that say about the murder rate of blacks V whites?
Actually. You are right. The chart I showed is not relative to individual races, it is distribution among the total. Therefore it is not taking into account percentage population by race. In which case, saying that blacks are 4 times more likely to commit a violent crime is accurate.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
No, that's not what that is saying. It's saying, as a relative percentage, 49% of blacks are arrested and charged with murder, while 48% of whites are. It's not relative to each other, it's relative as a percentage of total black people, and white people, respectively.
Sorry, but you are wrong. The data you posted says that blacks were arrested for 49% of the murders that were committed in that year. Assuming they weren't falsely arrested, that means they committed 49% of the murders in that year. When 12% of the population commits 49% of the murders, they are over represented relative to their general population by a little more than 4 times. Likewise, whites are under represented relative to their general population.

I can outshoot you, and I can out-math you.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Actually. You are right. The chart I showed is not relative to individual races, it is distribution among the total. Therefore it is not taking into account percentage population by race. In which case, saying that blacks are 4 times more likely to commit a violent crime is accurate.
Thank you for telling the truth. This time. ;-)

Buck would have just pulled some bullshit numbers out of his ass, and spewed a bunch of non-sense about the census. Skylard would have swooned, the hard-nosed quants would have rolled their eyes, and the majority of RIU would have hugged their own preconceptions to their breasts.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
Sorry, but you are wrong. The data you posted says that blacks were arrested for 49% of the murders that were committed in that year. Assuming they weren't falsely arrested, that means they committed 49% of the murders in that year. When 12% of the population commits 49% of the murders, they are over represented relative to their general population by a little more than 4 times. Likewise, whites are under represented relative to their general population.

I can outshoot you, and I can out-math you.
My reading comprehension failed me that time.
You definitely can't out-math me. lol. I write algorithms for natural language processing that would blow your mind.
 

TBoneJack

Well-Known Member
My reading comprehension failed me that time.
You definitely can't out-math me. lol. I write algorithms for natural language processing that would blow your mind.
Care to expound a bit? I'll understand if you can't due to clearance or NDA reasons.

What kinda algorithms are they? As in a voice interpreter? Java? C++?

Sounds cool.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
My reading comprehension failed me that time.
You definitely can't out-math me. lol. I write algorithms for natural language processing that would blow your mind.
I definitely can out-math you, and out shoot you. I have made a living as an engineer for many years.
 
Top