UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
awww, that's cute.BULLSHIT!
awww, that's cute.BULLSHIT!
You dont seem to understand english.that's not true, you just told another demonstrable lie.
still waiting on citation for your claim that "forest fires create global cooling".
or you can just keep lying and running away when you get caught lying.
probably not the alcohol since i haven't even cracked one open yet. but that'll change soon.You dont seem to understand english.
Last time you were crying about my claim that "forest fires create global warming" which is of course untrue. You accuse me of living in Apache Junction which I never said and is of course untrue. You lie, omit and just troll your way through most threads parroting retarded bullshit and posting cartoons.
Why should I care that you got it wrong once again, consistently and are demanding I defend something I did not say??
Could it be the alcohol talking?
CountryAnnual COthat's not true, you just told another demonstrable lie.
still waiting on citation for your claim that "forest fires create global cooling".
or you can just keep lying and running away when you get caught lying.
You continuously ignore citiations. I have long since quit chasing that troll trail after I get bored proving you wrong.probably not the alcohol since i haven't even cracked one open yet. but that'll change soon.
india does not produce more CO2 than us, much less "multiple times more than we are". china doesn't even produce twice as much CO2 as we do.
so now that your most recent lie has been debunked, let's go ahead and look at your less recent lie that kynes seems to have taken up (LOL).
"forest fires create global cooling" - got any citation for that, kiddo?
except you never said "china and india combined" or even implied it.CountryAnnual CO
2 emissions
(in thousands of tonnes) % of world
emissions
World31,350,455100%
China (ex.Macau, Hong Kong)8,286,89226.43%
United States4,433,05717.33%
European Union (27)3,688,88013.33%
India2,008,8236.41%
China 8 + India = 2 (US 4) so ... CHina + India = 2.5 TIMES the CO2 output...
i doubt there's much interest in "servicing" a dozen dudes every day at $20 a pop.I am going to sell one of my businesses for lots of cash and move up in the world again
I said the indians and the chineese...except you never said "china and india combined" or even implied it.
good job on changing the claim though.
got anything about those forest fires that cause global cooling?
Some guy wants to pay about 66K for the priviledge ;]i doubt there's much interest in "servicing" a dozen dudes every day at $20 a pop.
which implies logically that the indians (no need for an apostrophe, idiot) produce multiple times more CO2 AND the chinese produce multiple times more CO2 than we do.I said the indians and the chineese...
Too hard to make the leap eh??
Fuck if I care
so you're about 50 years old and your life's work is worth a mere $66,000 (if you're not lying, like usual)?Some guy wants to pay about 66K for the priviledge ;]
You misinterpreted what I said and now demand that I argue your error... Not happening...which implies logically that the indians (no need for an apostrophe, idiot) produce multiple times more CO2 AND the chinese produce multiple times more CO2 than we do.
good job on moving the goalposts though to save your lie based on being an uninformed dipshit.
no i didn't.You misinterpreted what I said
so you're about 50 years old and your life's work is worth a mere $66,000 (if you're not lying, like usual)?
damn, start looking for some beachfront condos in santa barbara!
so you're about 50 years old and your life's work is worth a mere $66,000 (if you're not lying, like usual)?
damn, start looking for some beachfront condos in santa barbara!
so you're about 50 years old and your life's work is worth a mere $66,000 (if you're not lying, like usual)?
damn, start looking for some beachfront condos in santa barbara!
the word "and' means combined.no i didn't.
if you meant to say "combined" or "together" you would have written something like that.
only once you got caught in a lie did you change your claim to "combined".
dumbass.
and if it was so simple and obvious, why did you shit out 300 posts of "Nuh UH!" "What Study?" "nuh uh!" "right wing think tank!" "what study?" "nuh uh!" "wheres your evidence?"the guy doesn't even know how to do exponents.
Is it a film developing hut? 66k?Some guy wants to pay about 66K for the priviledge ;]