Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
Gallileo, Aristotle, Euclid, Galen of Pergamum, and many others would disagree.
Satellite data proves Earth has not been warming the past 18 years - it's stable
- Thread starter sheskunk
- Start date
WORDZofWORDZCRAFT
Well-Known Member
I will cool this motherfucker down so far you will be begging for fossil fueled heat.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
argumentum ad populum.
the Malleus Maleficarum was reviewed and approved by every state in Christendom (far more than 34), and deemed accurate, valid and vitally important in combating the scourge of witches and witchery.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
"The Scientific Revolution established science as a source for the growth of knowledge. During the 19th century, the practice of science became professionalized and institutionalized in ways that continued through the 20th century. As the role of scientific knowledge grew in society, it became incorporated with many aspects of the functioning of nation-states.
The history of science is marked by a chain of advances in technology and knowledge that have always complemented each other. Technological innovations bring about new discoveries and are bred by other discoveries, which inspire new possibilities and approaches to longstanding science issues."
"The scientific revolution was the emergence of modern science during the early modern period, when developments in mathematics, physics, astronomy, biology (including human anatomy) and chemistry transformed views of society and nature."
"In history, the early modern period of modern history follows the late Middle Ages of the post-classical era. Although the chronological limits of the period are open to debate, the timeframe spans the period after the late portion of the post-classical age (c. 1500), known as the Middle Ages, through the beginning of the Age of Revolutions (c. 1800)"
No they wouldn't.
"In argumentation theory, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for "appeal to the people") is a fallacious argument that concludes a proposition to be true because many or most people believe it. In other words, the basic idea of the argument is: "If many believe so, it is so."
The proposition of anthropogenic climate change does not conclude to be true because many or most people believe in it. It's true regardless of if people believe in it. So that's only like the exact opposite of a what you said..
I'm sure it would look that way to someone who doesn't understand how science works
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you still haven't named one thing that 34 national academies of science have simultaneously been wrong about.
17th century "science" and modern day science are two completely different things, too.
try to actually answer the questions, mrs. palin. otherwise just put me back on ignore so you don't have to endure my mockery of your position in life as a grown goddamn man.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
seriously, die in a fire.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
unsourced authoritarian declarations of fact.
well played.
you "win" because you cant cite the source for your claims, and because you deny irrefutable facts.
anyone who managed to stay awake in 6th grade knows that:
100 million years ago, canada was a tropical jungle inhabited by dinosaurs
antarctica was also a tropical paradise
up till around 12000 years ago north america was home to "Megafauna" of which only the polar bear survives today
12000 years ago to present: ZOMG!! Glacial retreat!! Global Warming!! Extinction of Sabertooth Cats, Dire Wolves, Cave Bears and Mammoths Oh My!!
~1600 years ago, "The Roman Warm Period" which was MUCH hotter than it is now, including sea level rises that flooded the "Low Countires" prompting mass migration of Germanics into southern europe.
~1200 years ago, "The Medieval Warm period" which resulted in frenchmen crying into their wine glasses over the superiority of english vintages (still warmer than current temps)
~800 years ago "The Little Ice Age" froze the ass off of europe
~300 years ago it started getting warmer resulting in "The Enlightenment"
what part of these "Climate Changes" were part of "Anthropogenic Climate Change"?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
witches were once burnt at the stake, thus 34 national science academies are all simultaneously wrong about AGW.
is it any wonder that this guy still lives with half a dozen family members and is only a couple years removed from working at walmart as a middle aged man?
is it any wonder that this guy still lives with half a dozen family members and is only a couple years removed from working at walmart as a middle aged man?
Assuming this was possible, this would be ACC.
Maybe better to call it Deliberate Climate Change DCC.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that's actually not true.
even if it were it refutes NOTHING.
it would be like saying that the bubonic plaque killed more of europe than WWII did, thus the deaths caused in WWII were not unusual and not caused by human activities.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Yep, crackpot.
WORDZofWORDZCRAFT
Well-Known Member
Is there any chance at all that the sun is heating up our atmosphere more now than in the past?
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
i guess all those things never happened.
you might wanna call the textbook publishers and tell em to re-draft their books to coincide with your fatwas.
heckler73
Well-Known Member
The irony of that statement...
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
No, they didn't, and you can't produce a single credible scientific report, study, journal, publication, anything.. that says they did.
All you have are politically and financially biased individuals and organizations who are compensated to dispel misinformation and propaganda to advance their goals
Anything that goes against what you believe is dismissed. You are the exact definition of a climate change denialist. There is literally nothing you would accept as evidence of anthropogenic climate change.
You and the fraction of a percentage of the population like you are an embarrassment to the rest of us
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
kynes actually has declared that human activities are indeed contributing to the rise in global temps. he must now be trying to make good with his bircher buddies who raped him anally in a severe fashion for his slip-up.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
wait, so the dinosaur fossils arent real, plate tectonics is a myth, the roman and medieval warm periods never happened, there was no little ice age, and "glacial cycles" are a clever ploy by the Koch Brothers to confuse the issue...
who's the crackpot?
now i COULD go dredge up some sacred "Peer Reviewed" literature on these subjects, demonstrate how they are accepted as scientifically valid, show how they were used as sources by other publications, and generally work my ass of to show how deluded you are, but what's the point?
just like AbandonIntegrity, you will celebrate dubious research that supports your claims and agenda, and deny the existence of all evidence to the contrary.
we already had this discussion some time back, and you came away looking like a fool, so i really dont want to go there again.
it is dishonorable to bully the weak.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
good job on declaring victory.
that's another tried and true internet tactic, along with the "nuh uh! BULLSHIT!" rebuttal.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
I don't see how this applies to anthropogenic climate change
There is nothing involved in the observed data that doesn't fit the "paradigm" as defined in this video
By posting it, you seem to be implying that there are observations in the science of anthropogenic climate change that go against the accepted scientific consensus.
Can you cite one (some) of these observations that isn't affiliated with anything politically or financially biased? Don't post something from the Heartland Institute that says ACC is a hoax, as that would have political and financial bias. Anything that follows the scientific method, isn't getting compensated to say what they say, etc.?
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
The only thing keeping your bullshit side alive is money. Unfortunately for you, that money will run out eventually, and guess what'll remain?
You can kick and scream as long as you like, Kynes, progress happens whether you like it or not
