The Truth About Ron Paul - Part 2

Dan Kone · Jun 2, 2011

sync0s said:
I can't believe that market freedom is considered an extremist point of view.

And I'm sure Karl Marx couldn't believe that equality for everyone is considered an extremist point of view.

Call it what you want, but his economic views are to the right of any economic system that has ever been put in place by any industrialized nation ever. When you're to the left or right of any system that has ever been put in place anywhere, yes you're an extremist. That's what an extreme is.

For gods sakes man created government, government did not create man. Don't get it twisted.

Man created markets, markets did not create man. Don't get it twisted. Markets are supposed to be for the benefit of the people, people don't exist for the benefit of the market. Don't get it twisted. We can and should regulate markets to make sure they function in the best possible way for the people they are supposed to serve.

Regulation didn't exist with nomadic traders and cavemen.

Well then check out Somalia, it should be Paradise for you. Government so small you can drown it in a bathtub and free markets! So free you can strait up put a gun to their head and take their shit! Fuck yeah! Full second amendment rights, small government, and free trade! We should rename it RonPaulistan!

Personally, I like not being a caveman, but that's just me. I'll pay my taxes and drive on roads.

Anyways.. I must have spelled Newt's name wrong eh. Either way, RP is way up in internet curiosity, which is heavily driven by the younger crowd.

who generally don't vote

Also, notice how Sarah Palin's searches are driven by her home state of Alaska. Very little interest anywhere else. Ron Paul's home state of TX isn't even on the top 10 list of states, but does show up twice in cities.

Sarah Palin's searches are driven by drolling morons. What's truly amazing is they figured out how to type "Palin" into google.

beardo · Jun 2, 2011

Layering the hat with paper will make it more effective at blocking radiation layering it with gold flakes and silver will make it more effective at picking up and transmitting signals. I have one I only wear for when I'm going to be thinking about things I don't want other people to know about and another I wear when I want to to pick up comunications

Dan Kone said:
would those be tin foil hats?

*please let them be tin foil hats*

Scientific basis

The notion that a tin foil hat can significantly reduce the intensity of incident radio frequency radiation on the wearer's brain has some scientific validity, as the effect of strong radio waves has been documented for quite some time.[3] A well-constructed tin foil enclosure would approximate a Faraday cage, reducing the amount of (typically harmless) radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation inside. A common high school physics demonstration involves placing an AM radio on tin foil, and then covering the radio with a metal bucket. This leads to a noticeable reduction in signal strength. The efficiency of such an enclosure in blocking such radiation depends on the thickness of the tin foil, as dictated by the skin depth, the distance the radiation can propagate in a particular non-ideal conductor. For half-millimeter-thick tin foil, radiation above about 20 kHz (i.e., including both AM and FM bands) would be partially blocked, although tin foil is not sold in this thickness, so numerous layers of tin foil would be required to achieve this effect.[4]

sync0s · Jun 2, 2011

Dan Kone said:
And I'm sure Karl Marx couldn't believe that equality for everyone is considered an extremist point of view.

Call it what you want, but his economic views are to the right of any economic system that has ever been put in place by any industrialized nation ever. When you're to the left or right of any system that has ever been put in place anywhere, yes you're an extremist. That's what an extreme is.

Man created markets, markets did not create man. Don't get it twisted. Markets are supposed to be for the benefit of the people, people don't exist for the benefit of the market. Don't get it twisted. We can and should regulate markets to make sure they function in the best possible way for the people they are supposed to serve.

Well then check out Somalia, it should be Paradise for you. Government so small you can drown it in a bathtub and free markets! So free you can strait up put a gun to their head and take their shit! Fuck yeah! Full second amendment rights, small government, and free trade! We should rename it RonPaulistan!

Personally, I like not being a caveman, but that's just me. I'll pay my taxes and drive on roads.

who generally don't vote

Sarah Palin's searches are driven by drolling morons. What's truly amazing is they figured out how to type "Palin" into google.

Time and time again you turn your back on the Constitution with your half witted comments.

The only part I'm going to waste my time on commenting is your point about younger demographic not voting generally. It drove me to look up some statistics. According to http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/elections/how_groups_voted/voted_08.html (University of Connecticut) 18% of people aged 18-29 voted, while 16% of people 65 and up voted (thus showing younger voters aren't the lowest demographic). The second highest demographic age group of voters is aged 30-44 at 29%, while the highest being 45-64 at 37%. According to http://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2010/09/08/the-average-twitter-user-is-how-old/ the average age for a twitter account is 39, LinkedIn is 44, and the 47% of all internet users are aged 50-64.

The point of the statistics above not only prove myself wrong with my previous post, but also shows that by RP dominating internet searches over most candidates, doesn't isolate him to an 18-29 demographic. It clearly shows he could cover most if not all demographics, with the greater demographics under Ron Paul being the middle groups at which supply 29% and 37% of the voting.

Dan Kone · Jun 2, 2011

Dan Kone said:
Sarah Palin's searches are driven by drolling morons. What's truly amazing is they figured out how to type "Palin" into google.

note to self... When accusing people of being drooling morons, spell it correctly otherwise it comes into question who the drooling moron is.

NoDrama · Jun 2, 2011

Dan Kone said:
would those be tin foil hats?

*please let them be tin foil hats*

They are aluminum foil.

Dan Kone · Jun 2, 2011

sync0s said:
Time and time again you turn your back on the Constitution with your half witted comments.

The only part I'm going to waste my time on commenting is your point about younger demographic not voting generally. It drove me to look up some statistics. According to http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/elections/how_groups_voted/voted_08.html (University of Connecticut) 18% of people aged 18-29 voted, while 16% of people 65 and up voted (thus showing younger voters aren't the lowest demographic). The second highest demographic age group of voters is aged 30-44 at 29%, while the highest being 45-64 at 37%. According to http://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2010/09/08/the-average-twitter-user-is-how-old/ the average age for a twitter account is 39, LinkedIn is 44, and the 47% of all internet users are aged 50-64.

The point of the statistics above not only prove myself wrong with my previous post, but also shows that by RP dominating internet searches over most candidates, doesn't isolate him to an 18-29 demographic. It clearly shows he could cover most if not all demographics, with the greater demographics under Ron Paul being the middle groups at which supply 29% and 37% of the voting.

2008 was a statistical anomaly. voting in that demographic was around double what it was in the past several elections if I remember correctly. You can't use 2008 as an average predictor for that stat.

Also I question that statistic in terms of seniors. Generally they vote in higher numbers than any other demographic.

Adding Rick Santorum to the mix indicates the number of internet searches might not be an indicator of how people will vote.

sync0s · Jun 2, 2011

Dan Kone said:
2008 was a statistical anomaly. voting in that demographic was around double what it was in the past several elections if I remember correctly. You can't use 2008 as an average predictor for that stat.

Also I question that statistic in terms of seniors. Generally they vote in higher numbers than any other demographic.

Adding Rick Santorum to the mix indicates the number of internet searches might not be an indicator of how people will vote.

Granted your right in many ways, but it's better to look at recent voting trends than old. Also, the skew in voting in 2008 was a big change because people actually cared. A lot of people, especially young, don't vote when they don't understand the candidates and what difference it will make, but someone who catches their attention comes along and rest assured they will vote.

I'm not saying RP searches is a trend as to how people will vote, I'm saying that it is a trend as to how many people are researching the ideals of RP as a candidate. This, in turn, will drive up his support even if only 1% of those searches turns into a new supporter.

Your senior remark is somewhat true but in many standards in the US 55+ is considered a senior (although you can't retire until I believe 62 or something, as far as SS is concerned anyways). Also, take in to account health problems that begin to occur once you're over the age of 65 in many people. I highly doubt someone who has come upon a case of dementia is going to go vote.

Parker · Jun 3, 2011

Dan Kone said:
So you're going to vote for a guy who will try to cut off funding for you to go to school. Genius.

Congratulations on being tricked by republicans into thinking the best interests of the ultra wealthy are also you're best interests.

You need to STFU. Only a complete horses ass would ignore how inexpensive college was BEFORE Federal loans. The reason college is so expensive is because the universities KNOW the Feds will pay. It's guaranteed. 2k a year to go to school then the Feds loan 2k. 5 k a year to go to school then the Feds loan 5k.
This is another example of when you subsidize something you get more of it. Instead of giving reach arounds with your girlfriend auntiebuck read a book and learn something you stupid ass.

Parker · Jun 3, 2011

UncleBuck said:
they are not mutually exclusive. many people work while getting a degree, like i did.

Beauty College is not a degree douchebag. No actual college would admit you. You couldn't pour piss out of a bucket without instructions.

NoDrama · Jun 3, 2011

Dan Kone said:
So you're going to vote for a guy who will try to cut off funding for you to go to school. Genius.

Congratulations on being tricked by republicans into thinking the best interests of the ultra wealthy are also you're best interests.

If government stopped subsidizing America's College education you will see the price of tuition fall precipitously.

UncleBuck · Jun 3, 2011

Parker said:
Beauty College is not a degree douchebag. No actual college would admit you. You couldn't pour piss out of a bucket without instructions.

what smells like aspercreme?

bobbypyn · Jun 3, 2011

you ppl are delusional if you think Ron Paul has a snowballs chance in El Paso of becoming the next president. black people and hippies still remember what the John Birch Society is all about. the shitty thing is... i agree with all of RPs fiscal views, like i always say, i just know there's poison in the kool-aid. drink up, suckers!

budlover13 · Jun 3, 2011

Just convinced a 70 and 72 year old couple to vote for Dr Paul! Yay!!!!!!!!

Dan Kone · Jun 3, 2011

NoDrama said:
If government stopped subsidizing America's College education you will see the price of tuition fall precipitously.

Really, because college prices have been going up and up, colleges have been over enrolling students in order to get more money, etc. Hard to believe these schools would just decide to be nice and drop prices.

Carthoris · Jun 3, 2011

edit - duh

PetFlora · Jun 3, 2011

I have supported RP every step of the way. I was shocked to see the words come out of his mouth "Israel is our friend" I am not talking your everyday blue collar jews, I am talking the Zionist jews who govern them and control politics around the world, including our own

bobbypyn · Jun 3, 2011

oh HELL YES he's a zionist; you see, freemasons think Israel is really theirs. They're just lettin the jews watch it for em till they raze the Temple Mound Mosque to rebuild Solomon's temple. it's all satanic luciferian shite.

Carthoris · Jun 3, 2011

Dan Kone said:
Really, because college prices have been going up and up, colleges have been over enrolling students in order to get more money, etc. Hard to believe these schools would just decide to be nice and drop prices.

Half of the increase of tuition every year is simple inflation caused by our government. It's hard to believe people would be nice and just drop the price of their houses 150k too like has been happening due to a lack of demand in the last couple years. Lack of demand usually results in lower prices to increase demand by the suppliers.

bobbypyn · Jun 3, 2011

[video=youtube;c2OXuXTkBNQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2OXuXTkBNQ[/video]

33rd degree freemason, folks.

UncleBuck · Jun 3, 2011

PetFlora said:
I have supported RP every step of the way. I was shocked to see the words come out of his mouth "Israel is our friend" I am not talking your everyday blue collar jews, I am talking the Zionist jews who govern them and control politics around the world, including our own

brool story, co.

The Truth About Ron Paul - Part 2

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

King Tut

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Similar threads