Kaptain Kron
Well-Known Member
This guy just keeps gettin funnier lol I'm glad I took a bong time right now lol it made hat so much funnier
**ULTIMATE LED TEST** *GLH Spectra 290* VS *Blackstar 500* VS *Hydro Grow LED 336X*
- Thread starter WeJuana
- Start date
yup just keep on lying.
Kaptain Kron
Well-Known Member
Ha ha I cant even take a bong time without lying oh the horror of it all lol ha ha ha dood u could make some money get off the net and hit an open mike night or somthin lol ha ha ha
PrezDickie
Well-Known Member
I gotta say I'm underwhelmed by the spectra's performance
Bad Karma
Well-Known Member
Otra vez, y otra vez, y otra vez!!!
I wish I didnt muff up the nutes soo bad because it would be easier to definitively say it was the light. Next round I plan on switching out the 300 for the 2 150s to try for a better foot print so we may never know as far as the 300 goes.
Im not good at projecting yields and there is still a few weeks left so its all depending on what happens during the final "swell"
I would guesstimate around a 2 oz per plant avg. I did expect small yields from the start due to the small 3 gal pots and believe I even mentioned so on the first few pages of the thread.
I have it 55" from the floor and its definitely able to cover a 4x4 tent sufficiently.
LOL What do u want to see in a led grow light? and what is the most u wanna pay?
I beg to differ. Since I messed up the nutrient regiment so bad, and was completely lacking Calcium until the last 2 watering, there is no way to definitively say the lights are the cause of the plants looking this way.
I have a few plants going with proper nutes in the same tents > https://www.rollitup.org/grow-journals/486631-trinity-kush-penetrator-336x.html and https://www.rollitup.org/grow-journals/486633-power-africa-blackstar-500w-led.html
I see everything I need in the two that I already have. And I'm okay with what I paid for both (about $500 for the first and about $600 for the second).
I know it's not the lights that's making them look so bad. I was being sarcastic. all of them look the same. they're all tiny underdeveloped buds about the size of a thumb. yet people are chiming in saying that XXXX light is clearly in the lead. or XXXX light is catching up. or those lights are clearly costly trash. it's all crap yet people are trying to use them to justify one of these lights as being the best. even though the lights aren't to blame none of them looks good based on this comparison grow.
i
The LA Con clones started having little red spots pop up on the leaves with the very tips of the leaves turning green and curling downward. I hadn't seen this before so I google'd it (and image searched) and that's what I came up with. I then checked the nutes, and the only thing that had any trace of calcium was the B52 (advanced nutes) with a very small amount of calcium nitrate.
Usually calcium is added with the iron and magnesium in most Cal-Mag solutions.. but the Dyna-Gro Mag-Pro has neither iron or calcium from what I can tell.
Similar threads
