Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
if you had any valid points they would have been examined by the jury, but the jury found zimmie not guilty so you, bucky and al sharpton are WRONG and all your "points" have been deemed invalid.
zimmerman news
- Thread starter desert dude
- Start date
- Status
if you had any valid points they would have been examined by the jury, but the jury found zimmie not guilty so you, bucky and al sharpton are WRONG and all your "points" have been deemed invalid.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
no, i judged you after NINE lame incoherent posts each poorly restating the same bullshit narrative that Bucky and Al Sharpton have been slinging for a year:
zimmie is a racist evil MuderDeathKiller and trayvawn is an innocent victim, a defenseless child who was totally not sizzurped out of his mind, and was totally NOT nearly at all responsible for his own actions. see look at these 6th grade class pictures and see how innocent and helpless he looks...
zimmie made some bad choices that night, but the jury is in, and zimmie is not guilty. get over it.
dababydroman
Well-Known Member
they couldent prove guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. the fact is he followed the kid, the kid broke no laws. the kid doesn't have to answer to anybody for walking down the street. the dude brought a gun? why? why did he get out of his truck? and start an altercation.. are you not putting this together? the kid didn't do shit!
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
yes, and they were REJECTED you dolt.
if the "points" you keep repeating like a busted speak'n'spell had any validity zimmie would have been convicted of 2nd degree murder,, not released and given back his gun, you ignorant child.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
i seem to be able to put it together quite adequately. the same way the jury did.
what is your malfunction?
also, as you were NOT THERE you have no idea what "the kid" might or might not have done.
dababydroman
Well-Known Member
dude you don't fucking know me, I haven't listened to one single thing about what al Sharpton has said I don't even know who that fuckin is, I didn't pay attention until I heard everybody crying about it so I watched the damn trial on youtube.. I never fuckin said shit about racism. dude even if the kid was fucked up and have a troubled past he wasn't doing anything wrong at the time.. yea the trial is in dude what you don't understand is that I don't give a fuck.. hes dead it doesn't really matter. all I did is state my opinion. and you turn around and put someone else fuckin words in my mouth?
dababydroman
Well-Known Member
they weren't rejected, you have to be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, theres only one man to tell his side of the story the other ones. dead. so the same goes for you what makes you think Zimmerman told you the complete truth? why do you believe everything he said like people cant lie? ALL I EVER DID WAS STATE THE FACTS! I NEVER GAVE A VERDICT YOU IDIOT I NEVER SAID HE WAS GUILTY OR INNOCENT. CAUSE I DONT KNOW, one thing I do know is that he was wrong for how he handled it. don't fuckin al sharton me you don't know me.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
the injuries were not consistent with any major whooping, maybe a blow or two and a hard fall to the ground, some tumbling around. witnesses report seeing different people on top at earlier times, and martin on top later on. the fight moved 30-40 feet and past a tree and a sprinkler box, so lots of possibilities abound.
the more you think about it as a juror, it is the verdict that you have to give even if you know beyond any doubt that zimm caused all of it by being a huge dumbass. the law lets you be a gigantic dumbass there and still kill your way out of it for the mere worry of significant injury or death. zimm would be put away for pulling that shit where i live.
the jury that acquitted OJ had jurors that thought he was basically guilty too, they just said the state had not made the case for it.
SirGreenThumb
Well-Known Member
What is the point in beating this dead horse any further? The facts have been presented in the evidence, and the man was found NOT GUILTY. What could have beens are irrelevant, John guy tried it in his closing statements and it didn't work then and it wont work now. The only evidence to this whole case shows GZ acted in self defense, accept it and move on. He wont be convicted of a civil rights lawsuit either, it holds no ground, they couldn't get one person to testify to zimmerman being a racist. Case closed.
dababydroman
Well-Known Member
you trying to label me under some fuckin weird shit, because I stated facts and possibilities.. I have listened to absolutely nobodys opinion, I simple watched the trial generated my own and came here to say zimmermans a fuckin idiot and he could of avoided killing this kid..
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
yep. you gabble on incoherently making the same claims (but less intelligently) as Al Sharpton, so YOU put sharpton's words in YOUR OWN MOUTH. also, i believe you dont know who sharpton is, exactly as much as i believe you are a product of Thug Life, and exactly as much as i care about your ignorant opinions which have been PROVED WRONG by a trial, and rejected by a jury.
zimmie walked. the jury didnt find your poorly made arguments compelling, nor did they buy what the prosecution was selling.
according to the jury, zimmie snuffed trayvawn with good cause, and he faces no further criminal penalties for his LEGALLY JUSTIFIED SHOOTING.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
sorry dude. even nodrama in his drunken state gave a more plausible explanation for why zimm said "then i went towards him" right after hanging up with dispatch. your explanation is just uninformed and literally not possible based on what we all know.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
says the guy spreading all the coolest smears on the dead black kid after the verdict, smears such as trayvoning and lean.
we all know why you beat this dead horse. see my sig.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
these arguments WERE rejected, and thus the NOT GUILTY verdict was reached.
you sharpton'ed yourself with your clumsy and feeble attempts to recast FACTS as determined by the jury as FALSEHOODS to suit your pathetic opinion based narrative.
and no, i do not know you, nor do i care to know you.
internet toughguy in
3...
2...
1...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you have no idea what the jurors think, the last thing we need is a clearly racist bircher telling us what he thinks their decision was based upon.
they could have fully believed nearly all of what the prosecution was selling and thought that zimm snuffed "trayvawn" with very bad cause, but was still legally justified by a clearly retarded law.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
right.
so it's impossible to walk towards something not knowing it is there, only to discover it's presence when it is revealed.
so everybody who ever stepped on a landmine, got bit by a rattlesnake, fell into quicksand, tripped over a rake in the grass, or walked into a glass door was just malicious and deserved what they got.
also, what you THINK you know and "what we know" are very different things.
the jury seems to "know" that zimmie didnt commit murder, but you THINK you know better.
i gotta side with the jury.
mainly because im racist of course.
SirGreenThumb
Well-Known Member
Got your attention didn't it.
Trayvon was constant on that lean, I was just speaking the truth. Deal with it.
Your last sentence made no sense, and the retarded idea that you have about me being a racist because of your sig makes you look even more like a jackass. You are the biggest hypocrite on RIU and calling everyone racist all the time is the most ignorant MO I have ever seen from you.
dababydroman
Well-Known Member
see man your fuckin problem is you think im defending something, I know what the verdict is. im not making arguments of Zimmerman being guilty.. this is what im saying, he could have avoided it, and he doesn't have the right to harass somebody walking through the neighborhood.. my opinion is he was in the fuckin wrong. im sorry you sound like a bitch. you keep repeating the same thing the verdict was reach blah fuckin blah.. do you know how many people have been released after serving half there life's In prison because they were falsely charged.. what in the fuck makes you think it cant go the other way? the way you defend him sounds like a bitch your not even open to accepting the possibilities.. your just "nope nah don't wana hear it" verdicts in blah blah its a discussion idiot.
dababydroman
Well-Known Member
he was on the phone with the cops fuckign following him do you have any common sence he had a general idea of where he was at.. like I said when you follow and corner troubles gets for no reason at night what the fuck do you expect.. he was looking for a fucking fight thast why he brought his gun he knew what could happen
SirGreenThumb
Well-Known Member
HAHAHA, Facts. Like you were there and seen it with your own two eyes right?
Facts were presented in the trial that you claimed to have watched.
Why you so mad?
- Status