The Truth About Ron Paul - Part 2

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
lol. When you have polls with Ron Paul getting 80% of the vote and no other candidate getting more than 5% that poll is highly suspect. It seems like someone just went in and voted for Ron Paul 10k times in a row. In no scientific poll EVER has Ron Paul dominated like that.

We all know Ron Paul has a fanatical cult following. But a few dedicated people does not = popular support.

If you look at that debate objectively Ron Paul gave one really solid answer, but didn't do anything to stand out. There is no way +80% of the people thought he won it.
they will conduct telephone polls over the next few days which are unable to be flooded by some enthusiastic RP cultists. they will paint a different tale than the one deprave wishes to see with his confirmation bias and all.

and he will invent the PERFECT conspiracy theory to explain it all and insist that ron paul will win anyway.
 

deprave

New Member
@dan
no shit, those polls dont mean much of anything a 9 year old could figure that out, I just checked with one in fact, you dont gotta be a hater, If its true at least Ron Paul has someone committed enough to write a voting bot or whatever, wheres the other candidates supporters they are fully capable of writing a script or using TOR, they definitely arent clearing out their cookies. Nobody gives a rats ass about those phoneys its a big sham.....
 

Dan Kone

Well-Known Member
deprave I'm starting to worry about you lil buddy...what are you going to do if Ron Paul doesn't win ???? Will you be able to handle it ???
Or worse, Ron Paul gets elected and he figures out he's incapable of doing any of the things he's talking about because he needs congress to consent. Ron Paul turning into a human being would be a crushing blow to his cult.
 

Dan Kone

Well-Known Member
Do you have a poll that proves he is "Winning"?
The funny thing is, polling right now is 100% meaningless. That's what really makes all these fraudulent polling results funny.

For some perspective, in 1991 Clinton was polling in 11th place.
 

Carthoris

Well-Known Member
Or worse, Ron Paul gets elected and he figures out he's incapable of doing any of the things he's talking about because he needs congress to consent. Ron Paul turning into a human being would be a crushing blow to his cult.
I would also hate to see Ron Paul be considered a human. I think it more likely the entire congress be looked upon as the useless bitch cocksuckers they are.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
skip to 7:30

he says the constitution "literally" says 'no theocracy'.

i don't think he knows what "literally" means. i just pressed ctrl + f on my constitution and had zero results.

he goes on to say congress should never prohibit the expression of your christian faith in a public place.

what about other religions?

he gets the constitution he so dearly loves and most likely uses as masturbation fodder wrong... twice.

"congress shall write no law"....sorry, never saw that one in the constitution.
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.


Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

You really didn't try very hard did you? Not many people can remember a single page of written text like others can.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.


Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

You really didn't try very hard did you? Not many people can remember a single page of written text like others can.
i was nitpicking with "write no law" vs. "make no law".

but "no theocracy" is not literally in the constitution. fail, mr. paul.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
"YouTube Celebrity" Philip Defranco to Endorse Ron Paul? [From 2007]

Philip DeFranco is VERY popular on YouTube, with one of the most subscribed to channels at over 1.6 million people. Many of his videos get over 1 million views.

This video is already near a half a million views already.

[video=youtube;PN7-y6rrxp0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PN7-y6rrxp0&feature=player_embedded#at=100[/video]
I am a subscriber to sxephil and not ashamed to admit it.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I knew what you meant, and you knew what Dr. Paul meant too, didn't you?
yeah, but it is still funny that he said "literally". he reminded me of a teenage girl.

"so like, becky was like, no way, and i was like yeah! and then she was like, no way, and i was like, my head is literally going to explode!"

maybe it is just a pet peeve of mine.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
yeah, but it is still funny that he said "literally". he reminded me of a teenage girl.

"so like, becky was like, no way, and i was like yeah! and then she was like, no way, and i was like, my head is literally going to explode!"

maybe it is just a pet peeve of mine.
haha, yeah like gag me with a spoon fur shuuuur like.
 
Top