Bums and dogs...

What would you do?


  • Total voters
    46

Hepheastus420

Well-Known Member
That question is of the same sort as "so when did you stop beating your wife?" It's a no-winner to point out that I'm not doing ... what you say I'm doing. cn
That question is like asking, "so when did you stop beating your wife?". There's no point in trying to prove I'm not doing what you say I'm doing.


God dammit yoda, speak english. You're on a pot site.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
So then I was right, you're after my balls. Everybody is doing what I'm doing. Don't get why you only tell me.
Everybody is dong what now? And how does running in a pack generate moral authority??
You're straining mightily to make this personal when it isn't. As for the crude image of my "being after your balls" ... you placed me in a big sack of vaginas, remember? That was hostile and (imo) unwarranted. It would be better if you didn't overdramatize ... if you didn't characterize my dissent as a crudely sexualized attack on your person. It's the assumption thing once again, which is causing you in this instance to manufacture conflict unilaterally. Dissent is just that, no more. cn
 

srh88

Well-Known Member
Everybody is dong what now? And how does running in a pack generate moral authority??
You're straining mightily to make this personal when it isn't. As for the crude image of my "being after your balls" ... you placed me in a big sack of vaginas, remember? That was hostile and (imo) unwarranted. It would be better if you didn't overdramatize ... if you didn't characterize my dissent as a crudely sexualized attack on your person. It's the assumption thing once again, which is causing you in this instance to manufacture conflict unilaterally. Dissent is just that, no more. cn
you use big words lol
 

Hepheastus420

Well-Known Member
Everybody is dong what now? And how does running in a pack generate moral authority??
You're straining mightily to make this personal when it isn't. As for the crude image of my "being after your balls" ... you placed me in a big sack of vaginas, remember? That was hostile and (imo) unwarranted. It would be better if you didn't overdramatize ... if you didn't characterize my dissent as a crudely sexualized attack on your person. It's the assumption thing once again, which is causing you in this instance to manufacture conflict unilaterally. Dissent is just that, no more. cn
Of course I remember calling all of you a sack of vaginas.

Not overdramatizing, just wondering why you're after my balls. Not sure how much more calm I gotta be.. I'm already couch locked.

Everybody is making assumptions and then saying I shouldn't make assumptions. I'm doing the same thing. But you're only showing me the irony. Why?

And dude,, we're on a pot site, not writing a college paper.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Of course I remember calling all of you a sack of vaginas.

Not overdramatizing, just wondering why you're after my balls. Not sure how much more calm I gotta be.. I'm already couch locked.

Everybody is making assumptions and then saying I shouldn't make assumptions. I'm doing the same thing. But you're only showing me the irony. Why?

And dude,, we're on a pot site, not writing a college paper.
Two reasons, one complimentary ... one not.

You and I sort a know each other for about a year now and have had some good times. i feel that i can come to you as a friend and say "this is not cool".

The other is that your posts have struck me as the most burdened with assumption. The combination of your putting it most plainly and my knowing you best means that I will of course seek to talk to you first.

What i did not expect was sophistry and contortion.
cn
 

srh88

Well-Known Member
Two reasons, one complimentary ... one not.

You and I sort a know each other for about a year now and have had some good times. i feel that i can come to you as a friend and say "this is not cool".

The other is that your posts have struck me as the most burdened with assumption. The combination of your putting it most plainly and my knowing you best means that I will of course seek to talk to you first.

What i did not expect was sophistry and contortion.
cn
hep honestly knows more about this situation then anyone on riu.. just sayin lol
 

Hepheastus420

Well-Known Member
Two reasons, one complimentary ... one not.

You and I sort a know each other for about a year now and have had some good times. i feel that i can come to you as a friend and say "this is not cool".

The other is that your posts have struck me as the most burdened with assumption. The combination of your putting it most plainly and my knowing you best means that I will of course seek to talk to you first.

What i did not expect was sophistry and contortion.
cn
Neer, saying you guys are being a bag of vaginas isn't really an insult, nit really sure wth that is. I mean, it sounds like some sick shit.. And saying you're after my balls is just saying you're after my balls.. Not an insult either.
You're right, this isn't cool.
I'll stop using those towards you though if they offend you. All these other punks are still being bags of vaginas though.

Ohhh.. I get it now.. God damn, I'm a dick. My bad neer. See this is what your big words do to me.. Makes my brain explode.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Neer, saying you guys are being a bag of vaginas isn't really an insult, nit really sure wth that is. I mean, it sounds like some sick shit.. And saying you're after my balls is just saying you're after my balls.. Not an insult either.
You're right, this isn't cool.
I'll stop using those towards you though if they offend you. All these other punks are still being bags of vaginas though.

Ohhh.. I get it now.. God damn, I'm a dick. My bad neer. See this is what your big words do to me.. Makes my brain explode.
The part I keep trying to point out "is not cool" is placing the rights of the human behind the needs of the dog. That is my opinion, of course, but a strongly-held one. The welfare of the dog is only part of the story here, and the other part that interests me greatly receives short shrift from you.

The business with the balls and vaginas is a matter of decorum ... I'm not seeking to be personally starchy about it, but i do think that it doesn't help the tenor of the debate, but gets in the way. Again, my opinion. cn
 
Top