ClaytonBigsby
Well-Known Member
Then she shouldn't use it. THAT'S the problem, the USER.
Then you also agree, that because I CAN use mine well, I shouldn't be denied the ability because someone else cannot?Exactly couldn`t agree more !i
Then she shouldn't use it. THAT'S the problem, the USER.
Then you also agree, that because I CAN use mine well, I shouldn't be denied the ability because someone else cannot?Exactly couldn`t agree more !i
Then you also agree, that because I CAN use mine well, I shouldn't be denied the ability because someone else cannot?
doesnt matter. at 50 ft i hit a target with more than half a 20 rd mag on full auto and i had never shot it before. a guy with a 100 round drum could take all the time in the world to fix his sights as long as he has his weight into it. a very good portion of your rounds still end up on target. granted not as many as if you were aiming with it on semi auto and its really not all that efficient to just empty mags into objects but sometimes you may have to.How come you didn`t include the grouping on the target ? There is considerasble barrel movement on full, remember, 1mm movent for you is much larger splay at distance !i
tha .45acp in the thompson is the third from the left. the other two look like classic revolver or lever action rifle rounds.View attachment 2568510These are all .45 calibre
17hmr is more accurate than that. flatter shooting bullet and if your shooting 150 yards it will lay hole on top of hole. its my little varment tack driver. although i would never recomend hunting a dear with such a small caliber round. not enough punch to get the job done the first time if your just a few hairs off. then the dear runs off and suffers for no reason. even shot in the face if you miss a vital part a dear will run off for a while and you would be lucky to find it. it will run off with half its face missing. had a buddy shoot a dear in the face with a .223 and we had to chase it for miles into the woods when we were younger. its best to hit right behind the shoulder with a larger caliber round where most of the vital parts are. even if you miss a vital part you most likely took the shoulder out of commission which means no running and chasing and possible waste of a kill. you just simple come up and finish it the most humane way possible. a .223 or one of its close friends. but no smaller.i prefer my 22 mag., put it in the deers eye out to 150 yards.
Bullet technology has improved immensely in the last few years. There are 5.56 rounds very capable of humanely taking a deer out to 250+ yds.17hmr is more accurate than that. flatter shooting bullet and if your shooting 150 yards it will lay hole on top of hole. its my little varment tack driver. although i would never recomend hunting a dear with such a small caliber round. not enough punch to get the job done the first time if your just a few hairs off. then the dear runs off and suffers for no reason. even shot in the face if you miss a vital part a dear will run off for a while and you would be lucky to find it. it will run off with half its face missing. had a buddy shoot a dear in the face with a .223 and we had to chase it for miles into the woods when we were younger. its best to hit right behind the shoulder with a larger caliber round where most of the vital parts are. even if you miss a vital part you most likely took the shoulder out of commission which means no running and chasing and possible waste of a kill. you just simple come up and finish it the most humane way possible. a .223 or one of its close friends. but no smaller.
The second one stumped me for a bit. I think it's either the .45 "Short Colt" (typically headstamped .45 Colt Gov't) or its sister cartridge the .45 S&W "Schofield".tha .45acp in the thompson is the third from the left. the other two look like classic revolver or lever action rifle rounds.
The Long Colt is a formidable round.The second one stumped me for a bit. I think it's either the .45 "Short Colt" (typically headstamped .45 Colt Gov't) or its sister cartridge the .45 S&W "Schofield".
I would have liked to see the .45 Win Mag and the .454 Casull in the lineup. Jmo. cn
Especially in a gun built to really maximize the round, like the heavy fiveguns made by such artistes as John Linebaugh and Hamilton Bowen. cnThe Long Colt is a formidable round.
yeah but not much smaller than that. i wouldnt use any less.Bullet technology has improved immensely in the last few years. There are 5.56 rounds very capable of humanely taking a deer out to 250+ yds.
well at least your smart enough to know your a nut ob. most dont realize it and buy guns anyways.I suddenly feel very ignorant. I know pretty much nothing about guns, I won't let myself have one because I'm a nutjob and it's just not safe IMHO.
Right right. i built mine for hunting hawg and deer if i so choose to (and can find some here in Commiefornia). That .17HMR is a wicked little round but i agree, not for mid-sized game.yeah but not much smaller than that. i wouldnt use any less.
Must be you haven't seen the record stock indexes or seen the jobs being added. Lemme guess, that bad black man in the white house is ruining everything?Its been falling for years!!. It just hasnt hit bottom yet! but heading that way fast.