UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i'm simply laughing at your retarded conclusions, none of which have any basis in reality.I don't get why you're so negative about this?
i'm simply laughing at your retarded conclusions, none of which have any basis in reality.I don't get why you're so negative about this?
What chemicals? The addictive principle in tobacco is nicotine, and nicotine is the reason tobacco was domesticated from the git-go. cnMy main concern is that they will add these chemicals just like tobacco to get us addicted, and then selling it at extremely high prices. This was what the government had been planning since 06 they have been taking weed, growing it, and stashing it away. Once legal, they say okay, you can smoke it but only if you buy it from us. Now they want to sell tue rights so they don't have to deal with...paper work? Media? Who gives a shit
So the tobacco company comes in has everything, still is not legal to grow, the Feds are taking out dispensaries and patients houses, while everyone is feared from the white market so they go to the smoke shop. And BOOM! They make all the profits
i believe he is referring to some documents that were leaked from several major tobacco companies wherin they discuss adding extra nicotine (they tell the regulators it's a flavouring...) with the express goal of increasing uptake by "consumers" and then reducing the levels to cause greater sales as smokers attempt to get their jones, just like any street pusher does when deciding how hard to step on his coke.What chemicals? The addictive principle in tobacco is nicotine, and nicotine is the reason tobacco was domesticated from the git-go. cn
http://archive.tobacco.org/Resources/599ingredients.htmlWhat chemicals? The addictive principle in tobacco is nicotine, and nicotine is the reason tobacco was domesticated from the git-go. cn
Fixed it for youi'm simply laughing at your retarded conclusions, none of which have any basis in reality YET.
These companies purchase tobacco from local growers, i'm sure weed would be the same.That's the thing though. They're going to buy out everyone, while still trying to take out every grower in the state and make it so there's no where to get it but them. Once this happens one out of two things is going to happen 1) were going to be buyin hay weed for a high price 2) were going to be buying the tits for a REALLY high price.
The only people I see this not effecting are patents.. But what about civilians? Were all screwed
yet does not mean the same thing as ever.Fixed it for you
These companies purchase tobacco from local growers, i'm sure weed would be the same.
LOL. I see you playing a grumpy old man in the next lifeyet does not mean the same thing as ever.
No, the tobacco companies are not getting involved in marijuana. I have no idea why the Huffington Post would even post such nonsense. I first read about this back in the early 90s when Rolling Stones mag posted an article about this subject. I guess some just assume since both products are smokable that the tobacco industry would automatically be involved in the marijuana industry if it ever became legal. All myth.
Several of my family members raise tobacco and things have changed as far as the buying process since they started in the 70's. Now tobacco is auctioned in their area, it is no longer contract farming. There is absolutey no way that a company could supply the tobacco demand within their own means (without independent farmers).These companies grow their own. Just because they pay other people to grow it, does not mean they're "buyin it from growers"
Different companies put different things in their tobacco to get you addicted to their BRAND. Do you know how easy it would be for some "local grower" to piss off a huge company by selling their product and calling it the same name? That's what we call 'Trade-Mark infringement' I myself have been addicted to camels for years. That's my brand
i see you reading alex jones articles and then grabbing a soapbox and making a beeline for the nearest street corner to spread the gospel.LOL. I see you playing a grumpy old man in the next life
Reliving your childhood is not what I had in mind for myselfi see you reading alex jones articles and then grabbing a soapbox and making a beeline for the nearest street corner to spread the gospel.
I don't see how they couldn't? Grossing hundreds of millions annually. That's like saying Bill gates can't afford making apple PCs. So he buys Sony's and slaps and apple on it.Several of my family members raise tobacco and things have changed as far as the buying process since they started in the 70's. Now tobacco is auctioned in their area, it is no longer contract farming. There is absolutey no way that a company could supply the tobacco demand within their own means (without independent farmers).
One day weed may be in a Camel pack but independent farmers would still raise it bro, Camel does not own all the land their tobacco is grown on. I was just pointing out the fact that if marijuana goes that far the major companies will be dependent upon local agriculture to raise their product.I don't see how they couldn't? Grossing hundreds of millions annually. That's like saying Bill gates can't afford making apple PCs. So he buys Sony's and slaps and apple on it.
that makes no sense whatsoever, thus staying consistent with everything else you have blathered about in this thread.Reliving your childhood is not what I had in mind for myself
most tobacco companies buy their tobacco on commodities markets or contract farmers to grow it for them.These companies grow their own. Just because they pay other people to grow it, does not mean they're "buyin it from growers"
Different companies put different things in their tobacco to get you addicted to their BRAND. Do you know how easy it would be for some "local grower" to piss off a huge company by selling their product and calling it the same name? That's what we call 'Trade-Mark infringement' I myself have been addicted to camels for years. That's my brand