Republicans scared of Clinton?

[schuylaar]

If she gets elected president it may be time to retire to a foreign country. She's is unworthy of our nations highest office. She would be unworthy no matter what party she represented.

um, well..why don't you look up rush?..he too made the same vow if Barack Obama were elected..~southern drawl..please be a dear and ask him how that's working for him..hmmm..wontcha, sugahhh?

 

[schuylaar]

Of course they should be scared of Clinton. She's very formidable, very experienced and has the media doing work for her. We also need to check woman president off the countriy's bucket list.

RNC is already conceding they won't put their full resources into 2016..

 

[nitro harley]

Where have you been? He uses Biden talking points and calls Indians, "dot heads."

Well....Thats pretty bad..imo

 

[Jimdamick]

The Democrats will win again in 2016 because the only one in the Republican party that has a chance of beating her is Christie, but he is too mainstream and logical to be nominated by that cult called the GOP. So when Hillary wins, and she should as long as she is able to walk and talk, the Republicans can blame only themselves again for another loss. All they have to do is stay the same course, and keep up the good work in showing the country how fucked up the GOP is. They will be doing the country a favor.

 

[Rob Roy]

The Democrats will win again in 2016 because the only one in the Republican party that has a chance of beating her is Christie, but he is too mainstream and logical to be nominated by that cult called the GOP. So when Hillary wins, and she should as long as she is able to walk and talk, the Republicans can blame only themselves again for another loss. All they have to do is stay the same course, and keep up the good work in showing the country how fucked up the GOP is. They will be doing the country a favor.

Christie is a democrat in pigs clothing.

 

[Bombur]

What's wrong with GOP pulling their debates from networks with obvious bias against them? Seems like a logical move to me. On another note, why does everyone on this site buy into partisanship so completely? It's a fucking illusion.. they are all the same.

 

[schuylaar]

The Democrats will win again in 2016 because the only one in the Republican party that has a chance of beating her is Christie, but he is too mainstream and logical to be nominated by that cult called the GOP. So when Hillary wins, and she should as long as she is able to walk and talk, the Republicans can blame only themselves again for another loss. All they have to do is stay the same course, and keep up the good work in showing the country how fucked up the GOP is. They will be doing the country a favor.

she is the most experienced and qualified..you're right about christie, too..i predicted this coming of the "golden era" with the dems some time ago..gop continues to spin out of control with their "chinese fire drill"..you can have every 'pub vote 2x for gop and it won't make dent for the new majority of this nation..minorities are the NEW white meat

 

[ChesusRice]

she is the most experienced and qualified..you're right about christie, too..i predicted this coming of the "golden era" with the dems some time ago..gop continues to spin out of control with their "chinese fire drill"..you can have every 'pub vote 2x for gop and it won't make dent for the new majority of this nation..minorities are the NEW white meat

I would think about voting for Christie. Can't stand Clinton

 

[Wavels]

Hillary's run for POTUS has, amazingly enough, attracted scrutiny by the NYTs. The Times published a devastating expose' of the Clinton Foundation last week. This cannot help Mrs. Clinton. The story in the NYTs produced this defense of the Clintons by Media Matters (if curious see here:http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/14/us/politics/unease-at-clinton-foundation-over-finances-and-ambitions.html?hp&_r=1&
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/08/16/president-clinton-refutes-ny-times-errors-in-fo/195451)

And then on top of this Maureen Dowd wrote this piece:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/18/opinion/sunday/dowd-money-money-money-money-money.html?hp

from above article: “If Americans are worried about money in politics, there is no larger concern than the Clintons...Clintonworld is a galaxy where personal enrichment and political advancement blend seamlessly, and where a cast of jarringly familiar characters pad their pockets every which way to Sunday.”Dowd added, “The most egregious nest of conflicts was a firm founded by Doug Band called Teneo, a scammy blend of corporate consulting, public relations and merchant banking. Band, a surrogate son to Bill, put Huma, a surrogate daughter to Hillary, on the payroll. Even Big Daddy Bill was a paid adviser.”

The U S of A can most certainly do better than the Clintons IMO.

 

[NLXSK1]

um, well..why don't you look up rush?..he too made the same vow if Barack Obama were elected..~southern drawl..please be a dear and ask him how that's working for him..hmmm..wontcha, sugahhh?

Wrong...

That is what you get for listening to liberal pundits...

RUSH: This is yesterday afternoon and last night, a montage of a bunch of media people, all pure propagandists. Every one of these people said what you're going to hear them say after I said specifically I was not moving, I was simply leaving the country for health care if Obamacare passes and then coming back. Not moving. I said that before all these people say this.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2010/03/10/state_run_media_wrongly_reports_rush_moving_if_obamacare_passes

 

[abandonconflict]

LMFAO

Monica Lewinsky has more "experience" than hil, considering the only qualifications hil has is that she boinked billy.

Hillary was secretary of state in a very active post war period when Merica's interests were all over the place. She was also a senator, she knows the workings of gov't better than most people.

It would be a mistake to overlook her. If we're not careful, she'll be our next president.

 

[UncleBuck]

On another note, why does everyone on this site buy into partisanship so completely? It's a fucking illusion.. they are all the same.

 

[abandonconflict]

The Democrats will win again in 2016 because the only one in the Republican party that has a chance of beating her is Christie, but he is too mainstream and logical to be nominated by that cult called the GOP. So when Hillary wins, and she should as long as she is able to walk and talk, the Republicans can blame only themselves again for another loss. All they have to do is stay the same course, and keep up the good work in showing the country how fucked up the GOP is. They will be doing the country a favor.

I think you underestimate the power of racist white republicans who call themselves libertarian and pander to evangelicals. Furthermore, the Greens may be taking away some of Hillary's base and becoming a legit third in 2016. It should be closer than you think, but yeah she is probably going to be our next president.

 

[ChesusRice]

Hillary was secretary of state in a very active post war period when Merica's interests were all over the place. She was also a senator, she knows the workings of gov't better than most people.

It would be a mistake to overlook her. If we're not careful, she'll be our next president.

She is very well qualified. I hold a grudge against here because back in 1992 Bill Clinton made Healthcare reform
HER responsibility. I dont remember voting for her (actually Perot) so it kinda chafed me that she was put in charge of something so important.
I belive that had she of stayed out of it. We would of had what we call Obamacare back in 1992 when the republicans were pushing for it

 

[NLXSK1]

lol. so general.

he speaks of it three times in three days and refers to it as an act of terror each time, but i guess he was just speaking in generalities.

no wonder your world came crashing down so hard on election night and you scurried out of here with tail between legs for months.

you are a fucking idiot. stop making this forum a dumber place.

Which is why he had Susan Rice come out on every talk show possible and blame it on a video then make her part of the executive branch so she could not be compelled to testify...

Yeah, the most transparent administration in history... ROFLMFAO!!! Tell me another story UB!!

 

[abandonconflict]

She is very well qualified.

For what exactly?

I always see statements like this about a candidate. Qualified to be president? What kind of president? Qualified to continue the US on its present course? Qualified to accelerate that course?

Or is she qualified to make reforms? What kinds of reforms would she make, if any?

I doubt she would cut defense. I doubt she would push anything efficient in healthcare, education or infrastructure. I doubt she would throw us cannabaholics a bone. I doubt she would reform tax. I doubt she would even acknowledge anything green.

Fuck Hillary Clinton.

 

[jkahndb0]

She is very well qualified. I hold a grudge against here because back in 1992 Bill Clinton made Healthcare reform
HER responsibility. I dont remember voting for her (actually Perot) so it kinda chafed me that she was put in charge of something so important.
I belive that had she of stayed out of it. We would of had what we call Obamacare back in 1992 when the republicans were pushing for it

How would that have been a good thing?

 

[ChesusRice]

For what exactly?

I always see statements like this about a candidate. Qualified to be president? What kind of president? Qualified to continue the US on its present course? Qualified to accelerate that course?

Or is she qualified to make reforms? What kinds of reforms would she make, if any?

I doubt she would cut defense. I doubt she would push anything efficient in healthcare, education or infrastructure. I doubt she would even throw us cannabaholics a bone. I doubt she would even reform tax.

Fuck Hillary Clinton.

All of the above. I wouldnt vote for her. I dont like her. And it has nothing to do with the Republican attacks on her for 8 years in the 90s

 

[ChesusRice]

How would that have been a good thing?

Obamacare today is the exact proposal the Republicans pushed in 92 as an alternative to Bill Clintons proposal of Medicare for everyone



In 1993, 23 Republican senators, including then-Minority Leader Robert Dole, cosponsored a bill introduced by Senator John Chafee that sought to achieve universal coverage through a mandate that is, a mandate on individuals to buy insurance. Nearly every major health care interest group had endorsed substantial reforms--grandiose ones, in fact. The American Medical Association (AMA) and Health Insurance Association of America (HIAA), the two great, historic bastions of opposition to compulsory health insurance, both went on record in support of an employer mandate and universal coverage. Even the U.S. Chamber of Commerce endorsed an employer mandate, as did many large corporations. Other groups came out variously for reform options that ran along a spectrum from Canadian-style, single-payer programs on the left to managed competition and medical savings accounts and radical changes in tax policy on the right. Under the circumstances, it was easy to believe the country was ready for substantial reform and that a market-oriented, consumer-choice approach to universal coverage, positioned in the center, could become a platform for consensus.
http://www.princeton.edu/~starr/20starr.html

 

[jkahndb0]

I doubt she would throw us cannabaholics a bone. I doubt she would reform tax. I doubt she would even acknowledge anything green.

Fuck Hillary Clinton.

She would probably continue Obama's course and raid more growers than here predecessors...

Obamacare today is the exact proposal the Republicans pushed in 92 as an alternative to Bill Clintons proposal of Medicare for everyone

Yah, But how is it a good thing?
(*or How would it have been a good thing? Considering Obamacare is blowing up in our faces)