I need to rant about THIS section

Status
Not open for further replies.

spandy

Well-Known Member
Sometimes I wish I was a moderator to do just that.
I think its what the noob section needs most, deleted posts done by those who posses solid plant life knowledge. They need not be open minded, thats what advanced growing sections are for. The noob section should only be talking about tried and true and not go much farther than plant life 101.

These guys over extend on their first grows and I think thats why so many fail time after time. TOo much shit they are worried about when they should just be worried about their plant surviving the grow, and then they themselves can grow from there. But the mindset for these new growers is all to often "go big, gotta be dank and it's gonna happen the first grow" and then reality kicks their ass, and then a bunch of other noobs who are struggling start handing out advice.

Makes me wonder if this section is helping or hurting.
 

Trousers

Well-Known Member
I think its what the noob section needs most, deleted posts done by those who posses solid plant life knowledge. They need not be open minded, thats what advanced growing sections are for. The noob section should only be talking about tried and true and not go much farther than plant life 101.

These guys over extend on their first grows and I think thats why so many fail time after time. TOo much shit they are worried about when they should just be worried about their plant surviving the grow, and then they themselves can grow from there. But the mindset for these new growers is all to often "go big, gotta be dank and it's gonna happen the first grow" and then reality kicks their ass, and then a bunch of other noobs who are struggling start handing out advice.

Makes me wonder if this section is helping or hurting.



Solid..........
 

kryptoniteglo

Well-Known Member
I agree with this 100%!!!! There have been many times (my 2nd grow now) where I started to or even completed a reply to a thread and in the end just refreshed the page or left the page with out posting because I AM A NEWBIE and do not want to give advice unless it is 100% true either through experience or through knowledge gained from 'experienced' growers... I rarely follow advice from some one here who has a join date of the current month or even a couple of months since thread post.
DITTO! Not only that, but sometimes I'm about to reply to a soil grower's question when the question isn't about the medium but about something else...and I stop myself because I grow in hydro, and while I "THINK" the situation might be the same in both mediums, I recognize that it might not be. So I don't add to the discussion.

I have posted probably a dozen or so questions here and have gotten some great answers that have allowed me to do this with my first ladies:
View attachment 2480352

And along with those answers was a lot of crazy talk -- but I have to be able to figure out what's what. Even among experienced growers, there's plenty of discussion about whether flushing is good, necessary or evil, for example. Having someone new weigh in isn't helpful. And yet, some people may be very experienced growers but new to the site -- I've gotten some good advice from them, too.

Got to weed through it!
 

mr2shim

Well-Known Member
DITTO! Not only that, but sometimes I'm about to reply to a soil grower's question when the question isn't about the medium but about something else...and I stop myself because I grow in hydro, and while I "THINK" the situation might be the same in both mediums, I recognize that it might not be. So I don't add to the discussion.

I have posted probably a dozen or so questions here and have gotten some great answers that have allowed me to do this with my first ladies:
View attachment 2480352

And along with those answers was a lot of crazy talk -- but I have to be able to figure out what's what. Even among experienced growers, there's plenty of discussion about whether flushing is good, necessary or evil, for example. Having someone new weigh in isn't helpful. And yet, some people may be very experienced growers but new to the site -- I've gotten some good advice from them, too.

Got to weed through it!
Yep, I tend to not go past my basis knowledge for soil because quite honestly I've only done one grow in it. Every other grow I've done has been hydro so that I guess you could say is my forte.
 

puffdatchronic

Well-Known Member
Oh god ,more scientific debate.Just don't .just don't.

I get what your saying about the noob advice ,but really ,if they refuse to do a simple google search on their problem or read the stickies ,they are setting themselves up for it.
 

Trousers

Well-Known Member
I try to stay away from soil threads. I grow in coco.

I grow outside in soil a bit, but I water with my pond water and occasionally hit them with a 25% solution of what I feed my hydro plants.
That is not really applicable to most soil grows.

The only thing I can offer to soil growers is:

Use mycorrhizae, damn all my outdoor, soil plants love it so much. It won't survive in my coco, sigh.
It can not hurt them, so I feel good about offering that.
 

bassclef

Active Member
I agree with the sentiment here. I love helping newbies (hey we were all newbies once) but some of the questions are so ridiculous it's obvious they haven't researched anything, least being the security required to grow successfully in a non-legal state. Hint: the bedroom closet in your parent's house is not secure.

It should be enough for them to read some literature, stickies and learn themselves. If they don't have the discipline to do that, they sure won't have the discipline to successfully harvest a plant that can be quite tricky to grow. I don't want to help a newbie who can't help himself, that's for sure.
 

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
i use myco's in coco does great, once a month inoculations, is there tricoderma in your myco additive trouser

but i think we run different coco set ups, i keep mine saturated, 25%-35% min
 

polyarcturus

Well-Known Member
whats up shim, you should know by now this is how it is... how many of these threads have you seen created? ive created one myself in the past. never seems to lead to a resolution... so i stopped helping peeps. occasionally tho ill get involved but its just a matter of time before an argument starts over some dumbshit with a newb that doesnt know up from down. so i say fuckit, i stopped giving advice and just wait for people to ask me or just chime in when needed. when i correct someone and they disagree alot of times i just ignore it and try to continue with the proper advice.
 

Trousers

Well-Known Member
i use myco's in coco does great, once a month inoculations, is there tricoderma in your myco additive trouser

but i think we run different coco set ups, i keep mine saturated, 25%-35% min
I do the Lucas Formula for coco. I water to waste some, depending on how lazy/busy I get.
Most of the stuff in my myco's (thanks for the abbreviation, I can never remember how to spell that) supposedly gets killed by that ratio of fert.

I have two kinds of tricoderma in mine among about 35 others. It is Plant Success.



So some of the stuff will survive?
I could start using it again, I just thought it was a waste in coco with the Lucas formula.
 

jdhutson2006

Active Member
As a newbie myself, before i ever came to this web site i did my reading....and more reading....and more....then i came here to "pick the brains" of other growers, to post my questions, dilemas, whatever the case and collect OPINIONS. i weigh all the wonderful advice with aditional research. I love reading everything everyone has to say on here....some nights it "enhances" my giggles! :lol: PLEASE don't stop the commentary, banter, retorhic, and veteran advice! I LOVE IT ALL!!!!
 

Kite High

Well-Known Member
I do the Lucas Formula for coco. I water to waste some, depending on how lazy/busy I get.
Most of the stuff in my myco's (thanks for the abbreviation, I can never remember how to spell that) supposedly gets killed by that ratio of fert.

I have two kinds of tricoderma in mine among about 35 others. It is Plant Success.



So some of the stuff will survive?
I could start using it again, I just thought it was a waste in coco with the Lucas formula.
well only endos help with cannabis...the ectos do not...they mostly help with phosphorous absorption so too much P does inhibit them as its too much and they are not needed...in containers not hydro, very low P content is preferred as it does not leach away easily in containers as it does in soil outdoors...this is where the misconception of high P foods for bloom come in as in Agriculture increased P levels are mandated in bloom to reverse the leaching effects...it stumbled over into container plantings as well...high P and K is only beneficial the last week or two of flower as a stress factor to induce trichome production...also adequate sulfur is needed in flower to also support good trichome production...this is all pertinent to growing in soiless peat in containers...coco is great but I am partial to peat as I do not have to concern myself with the cal mag binding properties which are inherent in coco and hydro is too unforgiving for me but all produce outstanding results with the proper grower that listens to his plant and not to forum /advertising hype
 

Kite High

Well-Known Member
Thats not what experienced people have been saying. . . . since always.

and article by Subcool
http://www.theweedblog.com/how-can-you-tell-when-its-time-to-harvest/



http://www.kindgreenbuds.com/marijuana-grow-guide/harvesting.html





In other words, i think its true to say that the CBD and CBN content will create more of a couch lock, narcotic effect.
and harvesting on the late side increases CBD and CBN.

Are you saying that is not true?
subfool is wrong...again...cbn is the cannabinoid that thc and cbd degrade into...it is worthless and amber only means less potency

see the article by Mel Frank shared earlier...and Mel Frank is a Botanist that is also one of the best and most knowledgeable cannabis growers of all time...he knows his shit and its based on science...not as with the pollen chucker subfool

And DJ Short was giving his advice in knowledge from the late eighties early 90's which is now outdated and inaccurate...I am guilty of doing just that here very recently...but what do I know?

Only that I love to grow and use this plant
 

Kite High

Well-Known Member
I do the Lucas Formula for coco. I water to waste some, depending on how lazy/busy I get.
Most of the stuff in my myco's (thanks for the abbreviation, I can never remember how to spell that) supposedly gets killed by that ratio of fert.

I have two kinds of tricoderma in mine among about 35 others. It is Plant Success.



So some of the stuff will survive?
I could start using it again, I just thought it was a waste in coco with the Lucas formula.
Here you go:

http://www.puyallup.wsu.edu/~Linda Chalker-Scott/Horticultural Myths_files/Myths/Mycorrhizae.pdf

Y
ou’ve probably seen them before—those white
threads too long and slender to be roots, yet
intimately associated with the root system of
your landscape and garden plants. They are fungal hyphae, and their association with many plant
hosts are collectively called mycorrhizae (myco = fungus, rhizae
= roots). These are primitive associations, thought to have arisen
hundreds of millions of years ago when vascular plants emerged
on land. Originally, mycorrhizal relationships were thought to be
unusual oddities; we now know that they are the rule, rather than
the exception, especially in woody plants. But, before you grab the
fungicide, let’s get to know these plant partners.
Mycologists have divided mycorrhizal fungi into two categories depending on how intimate the relationship is: those whose
root-like hyphae surround and occasionally penetrate root tissues
(ectomycorrhizae; ecto = outside) and those whose hyphae
always enter the root cells (endomycorrhizae; endo = inside).
Though ectomycorrhizae are only found in a small percentage of
plant families, they are important partners of many woody plant
species, forming an extensive hyphal network throughout mulch
and topsoil layers. (If you use a coarse, woody mulch in your
landscape you can easily find fungal hyphae inside the mulch layer
and some of these could be mycorrhizal.) In contrast, endomycorrhizae are widely spread through hundreds of plant families and
most commonly represented by arbuscular (previously called
vesicular-arbuscular) species whose hyphal-root interfaces look
like branches (arbuscule = small tree) or balloons (vesicle = small
bladder). You might find these delicate structures associated with
the roots of your annual flowers or vegetables.
How do mycorrhizae infect plants?
Healthy soils contain vast repositories of mycorrhizal spores
in the coarse organic matter near the soil surface, where they germinate under moist, aerated conditions. As the hair-like hyphae
emerge from the spores, rain- and irrigation water create channels
down through the soil towards growing plant root tips. Roots
of plants under mild nutritional stress release chemical cues,
such as organic acids, that stimulate mycorrhizal growth. If the
hyphae encounter these receptive roots, they penetrate the cell
walls, pressing up into the cell membrane and creating chemical
passageways between the two partners. Multiple infection points
and hyphal branching create a cottony sheath around the roots
that extends far into the surrounding soil.
While inoculated roots tend to be shorter and more branched
than uninfected roots, their associated mycorrhizae act like root
hairs on steroids, extending far beyond the root mass to exploit
soil resources. Like microscopic miners, mycorrhizae discover
and extract soil water and nutrients from otherwise inaccessible
pockets.
The impact of mycorrhizal colonization goes far beyond an
individual plant. Most plants are colonized by a variety of mycorrhizal fungi, and most fungi have multiple hosts. Mycorrhizae
can link roots of different species, transferring nutrients to the
plants with highest demand. At the same time, the dense network of fine hyphae increase soil aggregates and improve soil
stability, while enhancing organic matter decomposition and
acidifing the root zone. The resulting network is a virtual fungal
freeway of nutrient and water acquisition and transfer.
Mycorrhizal populations are dynamic both in the soil and
on plant roots; different species may colonize plants at different times of their life cycle. New mycorrhizal infections can
develop from nearby active networks, dormant spores, and even
infected root fragments. And when soil conditions are changed
by activites as simple as adding organic matter, mycorrhizal species composition changes as well.
Why don’t plants have defences
against mycorrhizal infection?
(See “Symbiosis”)
Most mycorrhizal relationships are mutualistic (“you
scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours”) in that both partners receive
a significant benefit in exchange for sharing resources. Plants
transfer carbohydrates and B vitamins through the hyphae to
the fungi, which are non-photosynthetic and can’t generate
their own food. In return, the fungi extensively colonize the
root surfaces and enhance the plant’s uptake of water and mineral nutrients.
Under well-watered, highly nutritive, crop-producing
conditions, there are reports of mycorrhizal parasitism, especially among monocots like wheat or corn whose fibrous root
structure is already well-adapted to nutrient uptake. In such
unnatural systems, the balance between the partners is shifted
so that mycorrhizae take more than they give. Not surprisingly,
mycorrhizal parasitism is rarely observed in home gardens and
landscapes, where woody plants with coarse root systems have
strong mycorrhizal associations.
What are the documented benefits
of mycorrhizae on plants?
Mycorrhizae increase both mobilization and uptake of
phosphate. This is especially important in alkaline or nutritionally deficient soils, where plant roots have a more difficult time
extracting phosphate. Improvements in phosphate nutrition as
a result of mycorrhizal colonization have been seen in leafy and
Mycorrhizae So, what the heck are they, anyway?
by Dr. Linda Chalker-Scott, WSU Science EditorPAGE 4 • MASTERGARDENER • www.MasterGardenerOnline.com WINTER 2009
root vegetables, fruits, nuts, grains, and ornamental and timber
trees. Mycorrhizae also have a well-documented role in improving
• plant survival and establishment;
• leaf, root and shoot growth;
• fruit/nut/oil yield;
• competition for soil nutrients;
• production of stimulatory plant hormones; and
• nitrogen-fixing activity by leguminous plants.
Mycorrhizae provide economic and environmental benefits
as well, reducing both the need for phosphate fertilizers as well as
nutrient seepage to the environment.
The trees and shrubs in this landscape, top photo, owe their vigor to what’s hiding underneath the protective wood chip
mulch. Rake back the mulch to discover healthy brown roots associated with the fine white hyphae of mycorrhizae.WINTER 2009 www.MasterGardenerOnline.com • MASTERGARDENER • PAGE 5
Protection from stress
With the documented benefits of mycorrhizal
fungi, it’s not surprising to find their plant partners
are more resistant to environmental stresses such as
drought. A consistent water supply via the mycorrhizal network allows plants to keep their stomates
open longer - and photosynthesize longer – than
uncolonized plants. Likewise, mycorrhizae can
ameliorate salt stress (which also induces drought
in plant tissues), an important function in more
arid climates.
Since mycorrhizae create a dense fungal
network around plant roots, it’s not unexpected
that colonized plants are more resistant to root
pathogens, such as Verticillium, and pests, including
nematodes.
Not only do mycorrhizae improve the water
and nutrient status of plants, making them less susceptible to opportunistic pests and diseases, their
physical presence on the root limits the available
space for colonization by pathogens.
Mycorrhizae can also protect plants from heavy
metal stress (including aluminum, chromium, lead
and zinc) by preventing translocation of these toxic
minerals from the roots to the rest of the plant. The
protective nature of mycorrhizae could allow their
plant partners to be used in phytoremediation and
restoration efforts at a reduced risk to plant health.
What hurts mycorrhizae?
(See “Phosphate and Mycorrhizae”)
Healthy soils, whether in a home landscape or a
natural ecosystem, are naturally rich in mycorrhizal
species. When the soil chemistry is significantly
changed by the addition of pollutants or contaminants including salts, lime, heavy metals, and fungicides, many mycorrhizal species are unable to function. But by far the most damaging to mycorrhizal
health is excessive fertilizer application, especially
of those containing phosphate; this includes composted manure and many soilless potting mixes. With
a plethora of nutrients, plants are less dependent on
mycorrhizae, and competitive free-living microbes
thrive in nutrient-rich soils. Mycorrhizal fungi
retreat into the shadows, remaining inactive until
more hospitable soil conditions return.
Any activity that destroys soil structure – like
wanton rototilling in a landscape - will also disrupt
the intricate mycorrhizal webs beneath the soil surface. Topsoil removal during construction is probably
the most damaging of all, as much of the inoculum
and all of the organic material and plants are eliminated. Adding insult to injury is the compaction
caused by heavy construction equipment, which
creates oxygen-depleted soils about as hospitable as
cement. Of course, mycorrhizal colonization and
Symbiosis
The Good, The Bad,
and Everything In Between
S
ymbiosis is a general term used to describe the interdependent
relationships among species. Three of these relationships—mutualism, commensalism, and parasitism—are divided by the thinnest of fine
lines. Understanding how these relationships develop and change over
time is both instructive and fascinating.
Parasitism occurs between a parasite and a host, through which the
parasite benefits and the host is harmed but not routinely killed. Usually
smaller than their hosts, parasites—like aphids, spider mites, or scales—
receive food or some other benefit crucial to their survival. The host’s resources are partially directed to the parasite at the host’s expense. Parasites
that kill their host are left without these necessary resources, so the most
successful parasites are those that are not lethal. Furthermore, successful
parasites avoid alerting hosts to their presence and slip past host defenses.
There are good reasons why the saliva of leeches and other bloodsuckers
often contains anaesthetizing agents! The various mistletoes, including
those used during winter holidays, are well-known examples of parasitic
plants.
Some organisms that depend upon a host for survival, apparently
neither harm nor help their host. These represent commensal relationships—a good botanical example would be the epiphytic orchids living
in rainforest trees. In theory, these orchids cause no damage to their
host trees, though arguably an overloaded tree might suffer limb breakage. Some scientists do not believe true commensalism exists, arguing
that such close relationships must change the host species in some way.
For the sake of this discussion, however, we’ll consider commensals to
be perfected parasites—they are not organisms that induce a physical or
chemical defense from the host.
The best way to ensure a dependent organism’s survival is to repay
its host—rather than attempting physically or chemically to dislodge the
foreign species, the host even invites invasion. Mutualistic relationships
confer benefits on both species involved, often to the extent that if one
species becomes extinct, the other one’s demise is ensured. Many examples
of mutualism exist in nature; one of the best studied is the “ant/plant”
relationship which includes members of Acacia. These trees provide both
shelter and specialized food resources for ant colonies, which live in the
tree and vigorously attack grazing animals that disturb the host’s leaves.
Moreover, the ants are weeding perfectionists—they descend the tree
and nip off any germinating seedlings that might compete for their tree’s
water and nutrients.
In my opinion, the most amazing example of symbiosis is found in the
cells of plants and animals—including you! We know that chloroplasts
and mitochondria both have their genetic origins in primitive singlecelled organisms that invaded other early life forms, though the exact
process is lost to evolutionary history. Over time, these endo-symbiotic
cells became part of their host’s biological makeup and vital to host survival. Neither photosynthesis nor cellular respiration could exist without
these two organelles, which contain their own circular DNA molecule
quite unlike the double helix found in the chromosomes of more complex
species. nPAGE 6 • MASTERGARDENER • www.MasterGardenerOnline.com WINTER 2009
plant communities will eventually recover, but unnecessary soil
disruption should be avoided.
What types of activities or products can help
mycorrhizal establishment in landscapes?
(See “Practical Information”)
To encourage these hard-working and beneficial fungi in
your plant community, you’ve got to cut down the junk (plant)
food - stop using soluble phosphate fertilizer! If soil tests show
you’ve got too much phosphate already, research has found that
conservative additions of nitrogen fertilizer or organic material can increase mycorrhizal infectivity. Warm temperatures and
daylight favor mycorrhizal colonization, as does mild drought
or nutrient deficiency. Plant roots need to be receptive to infection, and the best way to ensure this is to avoid overwatering and
overfertilization. Other environmentally friendly practices, such
as reducing pesticide use and tilling while increasing the diversity
of plant materials will favor increased numbers and biodiversity
of mycorrhizal species.
Do mycorrhizal amendments work
in landscapes?
Mycorrhizal amendments are heaviy marketed as products
that will improve soil health and plant establishment in gardens
and landscapes. These products can be effective for inoculation of
sterilized container media, but scientific studies on urban landscapes and other “real world” systems report that these products
have no significant value. In general, plant species inoculated with
commercial products and installed into the landscape are equal
in performance to uninoculated controls (which quickly became
colonized with native fungi). While the addition of organic
matter has been found to stimulate growth of native mycorrhizal
populations, applying commercial mycorrhizal amendments is
generally ineffective and unnecessary, given the widespread presence of indigenous inoculum.
One recent study tested several commercially available products containing mycorrhizal fungi and various so-called “biostimulants” (e.g. kelp, humic acids, and yucca plant extract) on the
establishment and survival of four commonly used ornamental
trees and shrubs. In the researchers’ words, “the treatments did
not lead to a significant improvement of plant growth of transplant survival compared to the untreated plants receiving routine
mulching with pine bark mulch alone.”
From a practical standpoint, two realities emerge from all the
research done thus far:
• Healthy soils naturally contain indigenous mycorrhizae.
Adding packaged mycorrhizae to such soils is a waste of money
and resources.
• If soils are impaired to the point where indigenous mycorrhizal species can’t survive, mycorrhizal amendments alone won’t
help.
Beneficial microbes are important components of garden
and landscape soils, and the best way to cultivate their presence is
through thoughtful, sustainable horticultural practices. n
Phosphate and Mycorrhizae:
A Love/Hate Relationship
O
ne of the many benefits of mycorrhizal colonization
is that plant root uptake of phosphate—especially
“unavailable” forms—is greatly increased. Yet numerous
studies have demonstrated that phosphate fertilizer is deadly
to mycorrhizal associations. How can these two realities
coexist?
When a plant senses that its tissues or the soil contains
enough phosphate, it no longer needs its mycorrhizal
partner and so becomes less receptive to infection by mycorrhizal spores. Phosphate amendment—especially soluble
forms—will inhibit mycorrhizal development on many
economically important plants. In non-agricultural systems,
such as grasslands, wetlands, and forests, phosphate addition
has a similar inhibitory effect on mycorrhizal infection. This
negative interaction has been experimentally demonstrated
and repeated in laboratories, greenhouses, nurseries, fields,
forests, and managed landscapes.
Often this inhibition is an issue of moderation. High
levels of soluble phosphate nearly always squelch mycorrhizal activity, while lower levels are sometimes syngergistic
with mycorrhizae, especially if phosphate is unavailable
due to soil alkalinity. One form of this mineral—rock
phosphate—can be particularly difficult for plant roots to
mobilize. Mycorrhizae, however, can easily solubilize this
mineral and transport it to the plant roots. Since plant roots
perceive a lack of available phosphate, they are receptive to
mycorrhizal infection and subsequent uptake of this phosphate source.
But, as with any other fertilizer, rock phosphate should
never be added to a landscape unless soil tests indicate a
nutrient deficiency. n
Practical information
for cultivating mycorrhizae
Coarse organic mulch is good reservoir for spores, and
litter type affects mycorrhizal diversity. Try to use a mixed
mulching material, such as arborist wood chips, which will
help reduce nutrient runoff and leakage.
Living mulch can facilitate mycorrhizal networks between plants. Consider using some of the many low-growing,
drought-tolerant ground covers available commercially.
Beneficial bacteria can assist in mycorrhizal activity.
Eliminate unnecessary use of broad-spectrum bacteriocides.
Diverse landscape plantings favor mycorrhizal diversity. Use a variety of trees, shrubs, ground covers, herbaceoous
perennials, bulbs, and annuals.
Strongly mycorrhizal plants—those with coarse root
systems—can alleviate phosphate overloads in landscape
soils and enhance mycorrhizal diversity
 

cflking33

Member
so fucking glad i read this ha... im a complete noob did my research just kinda threw stuff together for a first grow but its kinda upsetting listening to veteran growers rant about us noobs because sometimes i have just been mislead..(such as about trichromes) but now ive read it right and now have a better understanding... take some credit guys if you know somethings true share the info you cant really blame someone for not knowing some information.. i mean when i ask a question its normally about troubles im having not all of us are dumb.... you will never see a post from me "how much will i yield" or something along those lines.. im not a blooming idiot but its nice when someone with exprience has an input for a newb without bashing us... not trying to argue or anything.. hopw that made sense
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top