National Gun Owner's Insurance

Fenian Brotherhood

Fenian Brotherhood

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Hey, uh the cat threw up again on the new carpet. I'm a little busy this morning, mind cleaning it up ? Oh, and in the dryer there's a few clothes that need attending to, the iron is in the closet, right next to the vacuum cleaner. S'pose to be nice today, if you can get to raking up those leaves out front that'd be cool too.

Thanks.
Click to expand...
Oh that's funny.. No I meant that whenever some little kid gets busted for dope or a crime family kills over weed. It's always US pot growers who take the fall.
 
canndo

canndo

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
what a brilliant plan!



and of course when the "priviege" becomes so expensive due to premium increases, eventually those who cant afford to drop $3-500 a month on their gun insurance plan will get a visit from the cops as soon as their "policy" lapses and they will be summarily disarmed.

awesome.

and by jacking the costs up higher and higher eventually only those deemed worthy will be able to afford the self defense that "Baddog40" finds so repellant.

naturally, the cost of the plans will be scaled so they are just out of reach of say... the lowly "McDonalds Fry Makers" who "baddog40" thinks are so undeserving of any rights.

this is the stupidest least well thought out, most pointles and most fucking retarded proposal ever in the long history of the gun debate.

















.
Click to expand...

Yet so many have no problem with this very thing when it comes to health insurance. Gee.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
canndo said:
Yet so many have no problem with this very thing when it comes to health insurance. Gee.
Click to expand...
i never said that many people arent idiots, most of the people in the world are idiots. if you tell them they can have shit for free if they vote the marxists the power to pick the rich man's pocket the idiots will line up to join your crusade, but once the rich man's pockets are flat, or the rich move beyond the marxist's reach they slip down to the next richest tier of targets and dip into their shit, untiol everybody is broke (except the apparatchiks of course...)

thats why populism and democratic socialism works. it appeals to the great masses of morons. as long as the press keeps telling the dolts what to believe, and there's somebody else to take the cost the marxist populists are the heroes of the foolish proletarians.
 
canndo

canndo

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
i never said that many people arent idiots, most of the people in the world are idiots. if you tell them they can have shit for free if they vote the marxists the power to pick the rich man's pocket the idiots will line up to join your crusade, but once the rich man's pockets are flat, or the rich move beyond the marxist's reach they slip down to the next richest tier of targets and dip into their shit, untiol everybody is broke (except the apparatchiks of course...)

thats why populism and democratic socialism works. it appeals to the great masses of morons. as long as the press keeps telling the dolts what to believe, and there's somebody else to take the cost the marxist populists are the heroes of the foolish proletarians.
Click to expand...

Yet, the "rich man's pockets" happen to contain over 90 percent of all assets in this country, seems to me that for a while at least those who pick those pockets have encountered a nearly unlimited little gold mine.

I grow weary of the fear that we may somehow alienate the rich to our peril. This has yet to happen. I hear over and over from the rich how this is the most wonderful, zowie packed, extraordinary country on earth, until they are threatened by a few percent increase in their taxes and then they are the first to publicize their willingness to leave.

So which is it? Great place to make your wealth and then, well fuck you if you want me to contribute to what enabled me to earn what I have.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
canndo said:
Yet so many have no problem with this very thing when it comes to health insurance. Gee.
Click to expand...
Twenty years ago, health insurance was just that. Now it's available at a radically higher price, with seriously limited/reduced options and massive copays and deductibles. Is this the model you want as an example? If so, your intent can be construed as punitive. cn
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
As long as we are requiring insurance for constitutionally protected rights I think progressives should have to take out 10 million dollar insurance policies against libel and slander when they exercise their first amendment rights and write or speak.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
canndo said:
Yet, the "rich man's pockets" happen to contain over 90 percent of all assets in this country, seems to me that for a while at least those who pick those pockets have encountered a nearly unlimited little gold mine.

I grow weary of the fear that we may somehow alienate the rich to our peril. This has yet to happen. I hear over and over from the rich how this is the most wonderful, zowie packed, extraordinary country on earth, until they are threatened by a few percent increase in their taxes and then they are the first to publicize their willingness to leave.

So which is it? Great place to make your wealth and then, well fuck you if you want me to contribute to what enabled me to earn what I have.
Click to expand...
so now its all about how much youre allowed to have in your pocket before The Man can come and take if from you.

you may as well have that argument with the a fire hydrant cuz i know where you stand, you know where i stand, and all this will turn into is a shouting match.

the proposal put for by yourt Original Post is LUDICROUS, UNCONSTITUTIONAL, and just a trick to create the already proposed, and already determined to be unconstitutional gun registration schemes.

shit, the last gun registration bill got dismantled before it got out of committee. it's not gonna happen, not until you lefties pack the court with more dim witted harebrains like sotamayor.

try again in 20 years.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
so now its all about how much youre allowed to have in your pocket before The Man can come and take if from you.

you may as well have that argument with the a fire hydrant cuz i know where you stand, you know where i stand, and all this will turn into is a shouting match.

the proposal put for by yourt Original Post is LUDICROUS, UNCONSTITUTIONAL, and just a trick to create the already proposed, and already determined to be unconstitutional gun registration schemes.

shit, the last gun registration bill got dismantled before it got out of committee. it's not gonna happen, not until you lefties pack the court with more dim witted harebrains like sotamayor.

try again in 20 years.
Click to expand...
*
not sure about the constitutionality of a gun registry, but at this rate it won't take 20 years. couple more massacres will probably do the trick.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
im sure youll be delighted to share your joy at each and every one.
Click to expand...
i just get such a kick out of pointing out how loughner was only stopped after firing his 33rd bullet instead of his tenth. and how his 13th bullet killed a little girl.

how dare we stop the adam lanzas from having to reload so often. if he did, more children would have escaped.

deers are wily, i need a good 25-30 rounds to hit one.

and the racking of a shotgun by itself will do nothing to deter an intruder.

hell, the bad guys might think the bullets are fake until we fire 27-29 of them. only by the 30th bullet will they realize that we are serious about our self defense.

i am so giddy about the next massacre that i fully advocate for the tools by which the next massacre will be accomplished.

you gonna come at me bro? i have all these guns. come at me bro.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
canndo said:
How about it? Every gun owner should have to take responsibility for the fact that his ownership of a firearm by virtue of his 2nd amendment rights makes him at least partially responsible for each and every illegal, gun related death. That gun owner participates in a system where guns can and are diverted, where an excess of firearms are created and the creators motivated to sell, regardless of the qualifications of the buyer and in some cases in spite of their qualifications or lack thereof.

I propose a national fund intended to reimburse those victims of gun violence whereby each gun owner pays a yearly premium or a lump sum if he intends to have his ownership remain anonymous. The fund should be indexed to gun violence, should that violence go down, their payments would go down, if FBI stats demonstrate that gun violence is going up, premiums would go up as well. The lump sum buyer takes his chances.

This is not a tax and there should be a private insurer who takes care of the details, making a profit as is reasonable. Of course in order to have this float, manufacturers and distributors of firearms would bear the brunt of payments and they would be made liable in civil court.


How much is your 2nd amendment right to keep and bear really worth to you?
Click to expand...
What guns? I don't have any guns that you can prove. guess I don't have to pay.

Great fucking idea. NEXT!!
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i just get such a kick out of pointing out how loughner was only stopped after firing his 33rd bullet instead of his tenth. and how his 13th bullet killed a little girl.

how dare we stop the adam lanzas from having to reload so often. if he did, more children would have escaped.

deers are wily, i need a good 25-30 rounds to hit one.

and the racking of a shotgun by itself will do nothing to deter an intruder.

hell, the bad guys might think the bullets are fake until we fire 27-29 of them. only by the 30th bullet will they realize that we are serious about our self defense.

i am so giddy about the next massacre that i fully advocate for the tools by which the next massacre will be accomplished.

you gonna come at me bro? i have all these guns. come at me bro.
Click to expand...
You are showing how much of an idiot you are again buck.

the 13th bullet killed a little girl? How do you know it wasn't the 4th? Perhaps the 6th, they don't number themselves when inserted into the magazine, no possible way to tell which number of bullet killed which person.

Almost every state in the US limits deer hunting to 5 round magazines or less. Nice try at blaming magazine capacity for all the ills of the world, too bad it makes you look pretty dumb ( nothing new there)

If Lanza had to reload more, how would children have escaped? inserting a new magazine takes less than a second to accomplish. Well trained people can reinsert a new magazine and be firing on target in less than a second.

Maybe if all magazines were coated with butter, making the handling of them vastly slippery? Perhaps a new law making magazines have a buttery coating? Would most likely help more than any of the solutions you are bleating.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
UncleBuck said:
*
not sure about the constitutionality of a gun registry, but at this rate it won't take 20 years. couple more massacres will probably do the trick.
Click to expand...
The problem is when the media successfully train enough people into thinking isolated massacres (do the media jump up&down like this when the police murder people in the line of duty??) are so intolerable that gutting the law to stop them is the thing to do. cn
 
SirGreenThumb

SirGreenThumb

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
The problem is when the media successfully train enough people into thinking isolated massacres (do the media jump up&down like this when the police murder people in the line of duty??) are so intolerable that gutting the law to stop them is the thing to do. cn
Click to expand...
The media wouldn't talk about police being the bad guys, that wouldn't fit the gun ban agenda. If people were led to believe that the people who are sworn to protect and serve are just as likely, or more so, to go on a shooting rampage killing unarmed people, well that would be just blasphemy. Yet, some certain individuals still seem to think that law abiding citizens should have their gun rights revoked, and police should be able to carry "Assault" weapons just because they have a badge and so called training.

http://www.copblock.org/tag/injustice-everywhere/
http://www.policemisconduct.net/
 
SirGreenThumb

SirGreenThumb

Well-Known Member
I think what sickens me the most is that whenever a cop shoots an unarmed individual, they are given a paid vacation 99% of the time. Let's think realistically about this, if Adam Lanza or James Holmes would have just went and joined the police department, they could have gotten their jollies off shooting individuals, and would've been paid for it, all while it being (justified).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top