***PPACA - The Facts***

Here is the calculator on healthcaredotgov https://www.healthcare.gov/how-can-...-and-savings-on-marketplace-health-insurance/ They hide it really well. Had to go to individuals, how can i see how much with out applying, bottom of that page kaiser, link on the next page. For me: 28k income 1100payment with 4500 deductable So I have to spend 5600 a year for health coverage to kick in. That is 466 dollars a month. So if I don't have to go to the doctor I get taxed 3.6% of my income. If I DO have to go to the doctor the government wont help me until I have spent 20% of my income. Gee thanks.
Do prescriptions go towards the $4500 deductible or is there a separate deductible for that? Also, is that the federal exchange or a state exchange? What level policy is it? You know, bronze, silver, gold, wood?
 
Most people looking at the exchanges dont have employer sponsored plans. And the individual market was WAY fucking higher in price than what is on the exchanges

That market has been distorted by federal tax policy, which gives a tax break worth hundreds of billions of dollars to employers who provide health insurance. Eliminate the tax break and you eliminate the employer's incentive to provide health insurance in lieu of cash.
 
Or maybe it is just they wont help with non covered benefits. Idk.. Maybe I will just create an account and find out.

I'll let yall know if I do.
 
Do prescriptions go towards the $4500 deductible or is there a separate deductible for that?

It says it will cover 94% of my covered services. Gotta find out what those are tho.

I know there is a list for preventative care which is free regardless.


  1. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm one-time screening for men of specified ages who have ever smoked
  2. Alcohol Misuse screening and counseling
  3. Aspirin use to prevent cardiovascular disease for men and women of certain ages
  4. Blood Pressure screening for all adults
  5. Cholesterol screening for adults of certain ages or at higher risk
  6. Colorectal Cancer screening for adults over 50
  7. Depression screening for adults
  8. Diabetes (Type 2) screening for adults with high blood pressure
  9. Diet counseling for adults at higher risk for chronic disease
  10. HIV screening for everyone ages 15 to 65, and other ages at increased risk

  1. Immunization vaccines for adults--doses, recommended ages, and recommended populations vary:
  2. Hepatitis A



  1. Obesity screening and counseling for all adults
  2. Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) prevention counseling for adults at higher risk
  3. Syphilis screening for all adults at higher risk
  4. Tobacco Use screening for all adults and cessation interventions for tobacco users

Does the Tobacco screening mean they are going to test everyone?
 
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickung...reform-while-pretending-to-support-obamacare/
Busted! Health Insurers Secretly Spent Huge To Defeat Health Care Reform While Pretending To Support Obamacare

You don't seem to be following. I remember your article. I refuted your article by posting financial stats on the industry: hundreds of billions in revenue, tens of billions in profit--for just a handful of the top companies. You seem to think that $100 million, spent over two years--a tiny drop in the bucket for them, a fraction of what they spent on lobbying--means they didn't like or want Obamacare.

It makes no sense. If they thought they were going to lose money, they would have spent more than $100 million over two years to defeat the bill. That cursory payment looks more like an attempt to save face with the Chamber of Commerce than it does a meaningful attempt to defeat anything.

Instead of recognizing that--instead of acknowledging that these insurance companies will rake in tens of billions of dollars of our money every single year thanks to Obamacare--you tout that they spent a tiny pittance to defeat it. They certainly succeeded at fooling you, didn't they?
 
According to the National Journal’s Influence Alley, at the very same time the American Health Insurance Plans (AHIP)—the health insurance industry super lobby—was cutting a deal with the White House leading to its stated support of the proposed Obamacare legislation, they were secretly funneling huge amounts money to the Chamber of Commerce to be spent on advertising designed to convince the public that the legislation should be defeated.

How much money?
A stunning $102.4 million spent over just 15 months.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickung...reform-while-pretending-to-support-obamacare/

That amount of money is not "stunning" to an industry worth trillions of dollars. It's a grain of sand on a beach.
 
It says it will cover 94% of my covered services. Gotta find out what those are tho. I know there is a list for preventative care which is free regardless.
  1. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm one-time screening for men of specified ages who have ever smoked
  2. Alcohol Misuse screening and counseling
  3. Aspirin use to prevent cardiovascular disease for men and women of certain ages
  4. Blood Pressure screening for all adults
  5. Cholesterol screening for adults of certain ages or at higher risk
  6. Colorectal Cancer screening for adults over 50
  7. Depression screening for adults
  8. Diabetes (Type 2) screening for adults with high blood pressure
  9. Diet counseling for adults at higher risk for chronic disease
  10. HIV screening for everyone ages 15 to 65, and other ages at increased risk

  1. Immunization vaccines for adults--doses, recommended ages, and recommended populations vary:
  2. Hepatitis A


  1. Obesity screening and counseling for all adults
  2. Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) prevention counseling for adults at higher risk
  3. Syphilis screening for all adults at higher risk
  4. Tobacco Use screening for all adults and cessation interventions for tobacco users
Does the Tobacco screening mean they are going to test everyone?
Yes, you would already know if you smoked. They do because they can charge you more if you smoke. It's for their benefit, not yours.
 
You don't seem to be following. I remember your article. I refuted your article by posting financial stats on the industry: hundreds of billions in revenue, tens of billions in profit--for just a handful of the top companies. You seem to think that $100 million, spent over two years--a tiny drop in the bucket for them, a fraction of what they spent on lobbying--means they didn't like or want Obamacare.

It makes no sense. If they thought they were going to lose money, they would have spent more than $100 million over two years to defeat the bill. That cursory payment looks more like an attempt to save face with the Chamber of Commerce than it does a meaningful attempt to defeat anything.

Instead of recognizing that--instead of acknowledging that these insurance companies will rake in tens of billions of dollars of our money every single year thanks to Obamacare--you tout that they spent a tiny pittance to defeat it. They certainly succeeded at fooling you, didn't they?

combine that with 450 million just in ads against Obamacare
 
combine that with 450 million just in ads against Obamacare

Not from the industry. You only claim $100 million from the industry--over two years--which would represent a tiny, tiny, tiny fraction of their profits, let alone their revenues.

I think you should just acknowledge that you didn't know the context of $100 million for the insurance industry (it's essentially nothing, a grain of sand on the beach, as I said), rather than repeating such nonsense as "evidence" that the insurance companies are going to lose.

They won't lose. They helped write the bill, Chesus. They spent hundreds of millions helping to write the bill in the same period they spent $100 million--over two years--to defeat it. The insurance companies are going to be the big winners in Obamacare.
 
Not from the industry. You only claim $100 million from the industry--over two years--which would represent a tiny, tiny, tiny fraction of their profits, let alone their revenues.

I think you should just acknowledge that you didn't know the context of $100 million for the insurance industry (it's essentially nothing, a grain of sand on the beach, as I said), rather than repeating such nonsense as "evidence" that the insurance companies are going to lose.

They won't lose. They helped write the bill, Chesus. They spent hundreds of millions helping to write the bill in the same period they spent $100 million--over two years--to defeat it. The insurance companies are going to be the big winners in Obamacare.

Context in relation to their profits is irrelevant

They spent 100 million dollars fighting obamacare and that is just the money we know about
 
Context in relation to their profits is irrelevant

They spent 100 million dollars fighting obamacare and that is just the money we know about

Now that's telling. You think defending tens of billions of dollars of profits is worth just $50 million a year?

No businessman would agree with you.
 
Now that's telling. You think defending tens of billions of dollars of profits is worth just $50 million a year?

No businessman would agree with you.

You do know that under obamacare the insurance company has to spend 85% on customers or issue rebate checks...........right?
 
Context in relation to their profits is irrelevant They spent 100 million dollars fighting obamacare and that is just the money we know about
They spend more than that in a month on advertising alone. It's a very cheap way to give a false impression to the easily fooled (hint: you) to sucker you. Sort of like when Congress made insider trading and funneling government contracts to their friends and family illegal with great fanfare, and then quietly made it legal again two months later. How else does a public servant making 50 to 100k a year spend tens of millions to become a what 200k a year Senator and leave office 6 years later with 100 MILLION in assets? And quietly slip into a 25 MILLION a year "consulting" job?
 
They spend more than that in a month on advertising alone. It's a very cheap way to give a false impression to the easily fooled (hint: you) to sucker you. Sort of like when Congress made insider trading and funneling government contracts to their friends and family illegal with great fanfare, and then quietly made it legal again two months later. How else does a public servant making 50 to 100k a year spend tens of millions to become a what 200k a year Senator and leave office 6 years later with 100 MILLION in assets? And quietly slip into a 25 MILLION a year "consulting" job?

On that note, a lot of the people who wrote Obamacare are now employed by insurance companies and lobbying firms, commanding vast sums compared to their former salaries.
 
You do know that under obamacare the insurance company has to spend 85% on customers or issue rebate checks...........right?
Considering they will spend next to nothing on advertising and commissions now that buying insurance is mandatory, that sounds like a pretty good deal for the insurance companies. Not many other industries have a 15% profit margin. I'll wager their profit margin is higher with ACA.
 
Shit, the "greedy big oil" only makes 6-8%

The average margin for an American corporation is actually substantially less than 15%--nevermind big oil--depending on how you want to count them. For especially large companies, it's about 12%; for large companies, it's about 6%; for medium companies, it's about 5%; for small companies, it's just 3%.

The insurance companies would like to know where to direct their thank you letter, Chesus...
 
Back
Top