The Truth About Ron Paul - Part 2

sync0s · Jun 26, 2011

tryingtogrow89 said:
I don't need to tell you weather im gay or not, that's none of your god damn business, and i don't see the point of you dragging that into the conversation...
You are pulling this in a direction that makes no sense.
That's right, man gives the definition to words your absolutely correct, but
who are we as man, to keep rewriting and perverting definitions for every minority group out there in the name of equality?
Things like this and colored people (which we all are colored) want equality so they started hate crimes.
How often do you think that a white guy would press hate crime charges (which are a federal offense, phssh) on a black guy who was prejudice against whitey?
These matters are hypocrisies and are usually made one way streets.
So if i go beat the living fuck out of my neighbor, because i HATE his parties that he throws till three in the morning keeping my ass awake, is that not a hate crime regardless of color?
Gays can do whatever they want its their personal business. They can have legal unity, because if they want something that man and woman get, called "marriage", it shouldn't be called marriage for gays.
I told you they blatantly say that they are gay, because it seemed you had a problem with me calling them gays, so im only labeling appropriately.

It is very apparent you have no freaking clue what I'm talking about. Therefore, the topic as far as I'm concerned is done.

UncleBuck · Jun 26, 2011

Windsblow said:
What A maroon.......

what an eloquent and substantive rebuttal.

tell you what, i am going to open the only dispensary in your area, and i am going to hang a "no mormons" sign on the door.

tell me you are not harmed when you have to spend more money to travel further away to get your meds.

what a "moran".

UncleBuck · Jun 26, 2011

sync0s said:
It is very apparent you have no freaking clue what I'm talking about. Therefore, the topic as far as I'm concerned is done.

like donny, he is out of his element and needs to shut the fuck up.

Windsblow · Jun 26, 2011

UncleBuck said:
this is the result of allowing bigotry...

View attachment 1665665

you have the right to be as bigoted as you want.

you do not have the right to harm others with your bigotry.

case closed.

don't like it? go fuck yourself.

Your an idiot... I don't even know why I respond to a moron like you. YOu don't have a clue as to what your talking about and to dignify your post with a response is idiotic.

YOU have some sort of mental problem you have no understanding of American principles, Economic or Freedom.
YOU can go fuck yourself. And PLease... .Leave those kids alone.

budlover13 · Jun 26, 2011

UncleBuck said:
we the people? the SCOTUS?

i can not define harm, but i know it when i see it.

View attachment 1665667

the gas station, the laundromat, the restaurant are all private property of the owner.

the owner makes then 'open to the public'.

if they are open to the public, they must serve the public, without blocking out blacks or jews or whites or christians or whoever else based on bigotry of the owner of that private property.

you want to make a private laundromat or gas station or restaurant that is not open to the public and exclude who you wish? feel free.

So you're ok with me putting up a sign that says no blacks as long as i call it a private store? Like in downtown. Budlover's No-Blacks Gas Station. You pay 1 cent to join and you'll never have to pump gas next to a black person again. And that's ok because it's then private?

UncleBuck · Jun 26, 2011

Windsblow said:
Your an idiot... I don't even know why I respond to a moron like you. YOu don't have a clue as to what your talking about and to dignify your post with a response is idiotic.

YOU have some sort of mental problem you have no understanding of American principles, Economic or Freedom.
YOU can go fuck yourself. And PLease... .Leave those kids alone.

lacking any substantive rebuttal, you go on an insulting diatribe.

you lose.

and by the way, your insult should read "you're an idiot". you might not want to come off as less educated than a third-grader when trying to demonize your opponent as such.

UncleBuck · Jun 26, 2011

budlover13 said:
So you're ok with me putting up a sign that says no blacks as long as i call it a private store? Like in downtown. Budlover's No-Blacks Gas Station. You pay 1 cent to join and you'll never have to pump gas next to a black person again. And that's ok because it's then private?

you would be an asshole, but that would be allowable.

you are not trying to say you are 'open to the public'.

UncleBuck · Jun 26, 2011

Windsblow said:
Your an idiot... I don't even know why I respond to a moron like you. YOu don't have a clue as to what your talking about and to dignify your post with a response is idiotic.

YOU have some sort of mental problem you have no understanding of American principles, Economic or Freedom.
YOU can go fuck yourself. And PLease... .Leave those kids alone.

if i am such an idiot, as you claim, it seems like it would be rather easy to refute my argument.

instead, you throw insult after insult without any substance or actual rebuttal. just accusations that i do not understand freedom.

i understand freedom. i love freedom. there is an american flag proudly waving from my greenhouse.

and i am ashamed i have to share this country with bigots like you who would want to return to the days where segregation was allowed and discrimination ran rampant, causing harm to countless people along the way.

freedom does NOT mean the freedom to harm others with your bigotry. grow the fuck up and learn to argue without insults.

sync0s · Jun 26, 2011

budlover13 said:
So you're ok with me putting up a sign that says no blacks as long as i call it a private store? Like in downtown. Budlover's No-Blacks Gas Station. You pay 1 cent to join and you'll never have to pump gas next to a black person again. And that's ok because it's then private?

Haha. Yes, you would fail.

First: In urban environments blacks actually would be a large part of business.
Second: Very very very few white people would want to be caught dead at that gas station, because of the perception of being racist
Third: your gas station would have to refuse asian, muslim, jew, etc because the people who are THAT racist would refuse to join unless you had that policy.

You just cut out 99% of your possible business. Fail.

Let me ask you, is it okay if someone displayed a sign out the front window of their home that spoke their beliefs on blacks in a racist manor?

budlover13 · Jun 26, 2011

UncleBuck said:
you would be an asshole, but that would be allowable.

you are not trying to say you are 'open to the public'.

So we're coming down to semantics. You MUST be a lawyer lol! REALLY? i'm just absolutely flabberghasted after 165 pages it comes down to THAT?!? LOL!

budlover13 · Jun 26, 2011

sync0s said:
Haha. Yes, you would fail.

First: In urban environments blacks actually would be a large part of business.
Second: Very very very few white people would want to be caught dead at that gas station, because of the perception of being racist
Third: your gas station would have to refuse asian, muslim, jew, etc because the people who are THAT racist would refuse to join unless you had that policy.

You just cut out 99% of your possible business. Fail.

Let me ask you, is it okay if someone displayed a sign out the front window of their home that spoke their beliefs on blacks in a racist manor?

Exactly. And that's what RP says will happen. Free Market people.

sync0s · Jun 26, 2011

UncleBuck said:
you would be an asshole, but that would be allowable.

you are not trying to say you are 'open to the public'.

The only reason people would ever agree to a government regulating the "public" sector so much is for certain hypothetical scenarios. Few ever stop to think of how allowing this kind of power can completely turn this country into a totalitarian society. Realize how the limits do not stop with one scenario, and can be stretch to cover the entire market.

UncleBuck · Jun 26, 2011

budlover13 said:
So we're coming down to semantics. You MUST be a lawyer lol! REALLY? i'm just absolutely flabberghasted after 165 pages it comes down to THAT?!? LOL!

well ,like you said. youw ere not claiming to be open to the public. your membership fee is stupidly low, and your business model would fail in 99% of all places, but you are within the law.

just like private golf courses like augusta do not have to allow women or blacks. they are a private club. they are not 'open to the public'.

budlover13 said:
Exactly. And that's what RP says will happen. Free Market people.

ron paul should be old enough to be familiar with this...

View attachment 1665721

that is what happened back when we had the ron paul civil rights policy in place. try to re-write that.

UncleBuck · Jun 26, 2011

can we re-focus on the utter failure of windsblow here?

i feel like i just handed him his ass and he pouted about it and ran off crying.

so funny. what a nice guy, to let me make him look so foolish like that and all.

Windsblow · Jun 26, 2011

UncleBuck said:
we the people? the SCOTUS?

i can not define harm, but i know it when i see it.

View attachment 1665667

the gas station, the laundromat, the restaurant are all private property of the owner.

the owner makes them 'open to the public'.

if they are open to the public, they must serve the public, without blocking out blacks or jews or whites or christians or whoever else based on bigotry of the owner of that private property.

you want to make a private laundromat or gas station or restaurant that is not open to the public and exclude who you wish? feel free.

SCOTUS is wrong a lot of the time. I am not asking you to explain to law I understand to law (If you understand you can rest assured I do) I am saying regulation of private property is illegal and no longer private. I am saying that this country was founded on the principles of private property and just because some unelected Robes uphold a law doesn't make it sound.

YOU ignore the facts to fit your feelings. Not any sort of sound principle or law.

budlover13 · Jun 26, 2011

UncleBuck said:
well ,like you said. youw ere not claiming to be open to the public. your membership fee is stupidly low, and your business model would fail in 99% of all places, but you are within the law.

just like private golf courses like augusta do not have to allow women or blacks. they are a private club. they are not 'open to the public'.

ron paul should be old enough to be familiar with this...

View attachment 1665721

that is what happened back when we had the ron paul civil rights policy in place. try to re-write that.

In a Ron Paul society, blacks wouldn't HAVE to deal with that. All they would have to do is pick a state, move there, and write the laws as they see fit. The pamphlet you keep posting is a result of trying to integrate blacks and whites against their will. If the gov't tells me i MUST do something, i will react negatively. Look at what i posted ealier about Allensworth. When those residents wanted to travel i'm sure they used something similar but the liked it the way it was because they could go to their home and live their lives.

Windsblow · Jun 26, 2011

UncleBuck said:
can we re-focus on the utter failure of windsblow here?

i feel like i just handed him his ass and he pouted about it and ran off crying.

so funny. what a nice guy, to let me make him look so foolish like that and all.

Handed me what? YOUR a fucking tool. I have made clear and concise arguments. YOU just name call and talk in circles. I just can't believe I respond to you so I pointed it out. Then you declare some sort of victory. YOUR a maroon..... And yes I spelled it that way on purposed.

I sure hope you don't have any children. Your a lowlife and a large reason this country is going to shit,.

UncleBuck · Jun 26, 2011

Windsblow said:
SCOTUS is wrong a lot of the time. I am not asking you to explain to law I understand to law (If you understand you can rest assured I do) I am saying regulation of private property is illegal and no longer private. I am saying that this country was founded on the principles of private property and just because some unelected Robes uphold a law doesn't make it sound.

YOU ignore the facts to fit your feelings. Not any sort of sound principle or law.

again, private property can be open to the public or private.

if it is open to the public, you serve all the public.

if you are private, you get to pick and choose.

freedom does not mean freedom to harm others with your bigotry.

View attachment 1665741

UncleBuck · Jun 26, 2011

budlover13 said:
In a Ron Paul society, blacks wouldn't HAVE to deal with that. All they would have to do is pick a state, move there, and write the laws as they see fit.

that is about as realistic as 'if ron paul is elected, we will all get a raise!'

we tried the ron paul position on civil rights. what you describe is certainly not what the reality of the situation was.

budlover13 said:
The pamphlet you keep posting is a result of trying to integrate blacks and whites against their will.

what? are you fucking joking me?

the green book for negro travelers was the result of the segregation and discrimination before civil rights, published in 1936.

civil right did not happen until 1964.

you have got to be fucking joing me. no way you could try to say that with a straight face.

UncleBuck · Jun 26, 2011

Windsblow said:
YOU just name call...

really?

Windsblow said:
YOUR a fucking tool...YOUR a maroon...I sure hope you don't have any children. Your a lowlife and a large reason this country is going to shit,.

when i have children, i will raise them to respect others regardless of race, gender, sexual preference, religion, and the like.

i would hate to see what happens to your kids.

The Truth About Ron Paul - Part 2

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

King Tut

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

King Tut

King Tut

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

King Tut

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member