Samwell Seed Well
Well-Known Member
lol you live up to your name dont you . . . . .lol no back boneWho said anything about your spelling?
lol you live up to your name dont you . . . . .lol no back boneWho said anything about your spelling?
LOL what does that even mean?lol you live up to your name dont you . . . . .lol no back bone
I ROFL'd long and hard when I read this. Oh the Irony
care to explain . .lol . . .or maybe you cant explain . . . .even funnier , im laughing on the insideLOL what does that even mean?
Do you see the irony? No, of course you don't.
They were speaking, not texting.Texting takes more concentration, prolly why they've banned texting and driving and not chewing and driving...
Whether it was a deliberate part of the search or not, why didn't Martin continue home instead of stopping and waiting? We know he stopped and waited just from the amount of time between Zimmerman losing him and the shooting.Are you certain that the backtrack wasn't part of a search? There's no way to assert that it was in the process of disengaging. If it was part of a deliberate search (something you cannot disprove from the patchy location records) that changes the complexion of your argument imo. cn
If he hadn't hid and waited, he would be at home enjoying his tea and skittles and singing choir songs instead of being dead. It is 100% fact and indisputable. Saying something ain't true doesn't make it a lie.there is absolutely zero proof of this, idiot.
if clawfoot had bothered to listen to the interrogations, he would know that the "backtracking" to the truck was just another part of zimm's evolving story.
zimm admitted to the interrogator that he went down the T searching for martin.
maybe he should bother to get the facts of the case before opening his stupid, racist mouth.
because zimm said he was walking slowly.
also, i don't generally jog and talk on the phone. generally, when i'm on the phone, i usually stop actually. that's just my preference though, your mileage may vary.
zimm probably didn't even realize martin was on the phone, he was using ear buds which were probably not visible under his hoodie and his phone was in his pocket to keep it out of the rain.
I think the irony is that you are a dumb ass and don't realize it even as you insult others.care to explain . .lol . . .or maybe you cant explain . . . .even funnier , im laughing on the inside
lol<edit> 1/2 hour later he still cant explain what the irony was . . . .
first of all, martin lost zimmerman. zimm was pursuing, martin was fleeing. clearly self defense on zimmerman's part. i chase people in self defense all the time.Whether it was a deliberate part of the search or not, why didn't Martin continue home instead of stopping and waiting? We know he stopped and waited just from the amount of time between Zimmerman losing him and the shooting.
you have zero proof that he hid anywhere.If he hadn't hid and waited, he would be at home enjoying his tea and skittles and singing choir songs instead of being dead. It is 100% fact and indisputable. Saying something ain't true doesn't make it a lie.
not even close. zimm's story has changed way too many times to credit him with any tendency toward factuality.He was on the phone with 911 standing at the end of the path past where Martin turned off. We know this for a fact...
that's my greenhouse thief, not me.well that's cuz your ass does't have a cordless phone.
There is no onus on either one to do anything except refrain from assault.first of all, martin lost zimmerman. zimm was pursuing, martin was fleeing. clearly self defense on zimmerman's part. i chase people in self defense all the time.
second of all, martin had every right to stop and talk on the phone with his girlfriend. zimm had no right to stalk and harass martin. the onus would be on zimm to stop and wait for the police, not on martin to go home.
What we don't know is who started with the physical contact, and how. I for one am undecided. cnThere is no onus on either one to do anything except refrain from assault.
Look at Martin and Look at Zimmerman and it is clear who was assaulted in a "marginally life threatening" manner.
When you assault somebody in a "marginally life threatening" manner you either wind up arrested for felony assault (maybe murder) or you wind up in the morgue when your victim decides he has had enough of a beating.
Legally, Under Florida's SYG law, it does not matter who started the fight. But, "who started it" is a somewhat interesting question. There will never be an absolutely certain answer to the question, however, when looking at Zimm vs Martin my money is on Martin starting it just like Zimmerman said he did, by sucker punching Zimm and knocking him to the pavement. It is obvious that Zimmerman never landed a single punch. If he had, there would have been bruising on Martin's unscathed body.What we don't know is who started with the physical contact, and how. I for one am undecided. cn
We don't know who started it. Agreed. We do know that Martin wanted a confrontation based on the fact that he didn't continue home and instead either turned around or hid and waited for Zimmerman to return. He was literally a few seconds from his home. If he was afraid wouldn't he have ran home? This doesn't mean he started it, but it definitely makes it even odds and unless Zimmerman admits that this entire thing was a conspiracy to kill a nigger or two he is innocent in the eyes of law.What we don't know is who started with the physical contact, and how. I for one am undecided. cn