the oregon-idaho border and minimum wage

I never argued that tax breaks for corporations make jobs, so stick that straw man up your ass (to live with the gerbil).

I argued that businesses make jobs and set up in a location based on a number of variables however all with the same purpose, maximising profit.

But you were too fucking gung ho searching for your false equivalency and didn't seem to realise that the one with genuine experience in business is trying to teach you how businesses actually operate in the real world.

so you are "the one", yet made post after post after post trying to argue that they didn't set up in idaho, 800 feet away, because it wasn't close enough to the population center?

"they did a cost/benefit analysis!" - sparkling insight there, cue ball. dropping those gems of drunken irish wisdom.

the point of this thread is that the job creators are the ones spending money, people like you and me who drive aggregate demand.

secondary to this point is that significantly higher minimum wage is no impediment to job creation at all.

feel free to argue those points if you'd like, or you can just continue to bless us with your fine wisdom, "the one".
 
so any household that makes $200K or more per year is wealthy to you then.

Man you sure are easy to impress, there isn't a soul within 10 miles of me that makes less than that per year.

when you live in the boonies fucking sheep all day and have only one neighbor within ten miles (also sucking on that welfare teat of farmer welfare), no one is surprised or impressed.
 
when you live in the boonies fucking sheep all day and have only one neighbor within ten miles (also sucking on that welfare teat of farmer welfare), no one is surprised or impressed.
You probably live within 10 miles of 100,000 times as many wealthy people as I do. $200K per year really isn't that much money.

personally I consider wealthy as someone who makes in excess of $1 million per year. Fortune 500 types, not the accountant across the street.
 
so you are "the one", yet made post after post after post trying to argue that they didn't set up in idaho, 800 feet away, because it wasn't close enough to the population center?

"they did a cost/benefit analysis!" - sparkling insight there, cue ball. dropping those gems of drunken irish wisdom.

the point of this thread is that the job creators are the ones spending money, people like you and me who drive aggregate demand.

secondary to this point is that significantly higher minimum wage is no impediment to job creation at all.

feel free to argue those points if you'd like, or you can just continue to bless us with your fine wisdom, "the one".
The point of this thread was you figured if you slung enough shit you hoped something would stick and you'd look smart.

Instead now you look like an ignorant retard, congrats sweetheart.

Stick to the cat-shit weed Bucky...
 
you should be thanking wal mart. all the pot heads in ontario arent gonna have to commit interstate drug trafficking to get a gallon of milk.
 
tell me again how 800 feet to the east takes them out of the population center and will cost them 40-50% of their sales, "the one".

:lol:
Am I Walmart now?

Obviously some other factor maximised profit in excess of the extra wages, or they'd have set up on the other side and according to you, get the same business.
 
I have the need to be ideologically pure.

Oregonian midterm is a laugh.
I have no ideological side in this, I don't support any kind of Corporate welfare, but watching Buck flail in his inability to admit he's out of his depth is like a MasterCard moment...priceless.
 
You want your storefront in the area of highest population density...the higher population density pushing sales typically up to 40-50%.


Maths and all that.

"the one" has spoken.

Screenshot2014-05-17at104732PM_zps82dfbefe.png
 
no, you are "the one".

"the one" who says 800 feet will cost them half their sales.
If they are closer to the people for a lower price (lower sales tax), their profit would be maximised up to 50% more because they're selling more products and at the same margin.

You never wondered what the "prime" in "prime real estate" actually meant?

Thought "location, location, location" were buzz words?

It's a mantra you should've learned by now if you ever wanna convince Jew Daddy to sign his shit over to you.
 
If they are closer to the people for a lower price (lower sales tax), their profit would be maximised up to 50% more because they're selling more products and at the same margin.

that's not what you went on and on and on about at first though. you never mentioned sales tax.

it was purely location. those critical 800 feet.

"the one" is trying to backtrack over his stupidity now.
 
Again, where the location is on a map is irrelevant to the discussion.

I'll give you a hint, "don't make your customers go to you, go to your customers".

You have no idea about the relevance of the term "Location, Location, Location".

You want your storefront in the area of highest population density.
 
Back
Top