UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i got me one of them.Jewish girls with big soft titties
i got me one of them.Jewish girls with big soft titties
nice red! always giving the other guy a pat on the back for a good idea, right?So is writing the code to falsify the results
LOL, do you work at Diebold? This is exactly what I'm talking about. It's harebrained schemes like this that will allow elections to be stolen undetectably and dissenters to disappear. Looking forward to your forthcoming book on DIY neurosurgery.im too tired to go into detail about it right now, but the gist of it is that we base all voting off social security numbers, and have a series of redundant distributed web services that track the voting record of every individual. and several anti-hack procedures can be set in place to ensure validity of votes. not very difficult to write.
It's clear you don't grasp software development concepts or logical, critical thinking.So is writing the code to falsify the results
I will repeat what I said to Red, aka Firestarter.LOL, do you work at Diebold? This is exactly what I'm talking about. It's harebrained schemes like this that will allow elections to be stolen undetectably and dissenters to disappear. Looking forward to your forthcoming book on DIY neurosurgery.
OH NOES, Cant Understand Normal Thinking!!I will repeat what I said to Red, aka Firestarter.
It's clear you don't grasp software development concepts or logical, critical thinking.
What is it with programmers thinking know everything because they are able to figure out how to write a program? "I made a web framework so now I'm qualified to design a detector for the Large Hardon Collider or my own electronic voting system." Let me guess, this doesn't apply to you because you read _Applied_Cryptography_ and now you know what you're doing?It's clear you don't grasp software development concepts or logical, critical thinking.
People who consider ideas that would streamline a voting process that allows everyone equal opportunity to get in their vote as hair-brained schemes, are most certainly not critical thinkers, nor do they likely understand how enterprise software development works or how it's both scalable and secure.OH NOES, Cant Understand Normal Thinking!!
Again, I'm not sure you know much about software development. It is completely evident in your above quote that you do not.What is it with programmers thinking know everything because they are able to figure out how to write a program? "I made a web framework so now I'm qualified to design a detector for the Large Hardon Collider or my own electronic voting system." Let me guess, this doesn't apply to you because you read _Applied_Cryptography_ and now you know what you're doing?
The field of cryptography is littered with the corpses of systems designed by such people. It's benign, perhaps even fortunate, when we're talking about the BS that tries to force you to buy coffee pods only from the original manufacturer but very very bad when we're talking about elections.
You poor, oppressed commie.Who said they shouldn't?
More votes = more liberal votes, fact
Not too surprising those that don't tend to vote liberal wouldn't want more people voting..
Sigh.LOL, I'm not enterprise enough. First it was "clear" I didn't know anything about "software development" but now you're just "not sure." I've definitely got you nailed balls-to-the-wall see4. You're a typical programmer who thinks he knows a thing or two about crypto and everything else, as evidenced by your assertion that electronic voting is a software development problem. Have you even read one actual paper in the field of electronic voting systems?
+++++++repSigh.
What does "crypto" have anything whatsoever to do with developing a SaaS application that is both secure and scalable and can manage 340,000,000+ UUIDs?
You obviously don't know anything about software development. If you did, you would most certainly not be saying things you are.
Look dude, unless you have some actual valuable input on the subject and can back it up with some reasoned thought because of your extensive background on the subject, I suggest you let it go. You won't win this debate.
Best wishes.
What do you mean "cannot be traced back to them", why would you not want the voted traced back to the voter?Tell us, @see4, with your system how does a voter know their vote has been recorded correctly, will be counted, and cannot be traced back to them?
Actually, no. Nothing magically disappears, mostly because magic is not real, and therefore is not a valid variable in an argument.With a paper system, I have a piece of paper that I can see has my vote on it and doesn't have my name on it. I physically place it into a locked box and am certain that it wont magically disappear before someone opens the box later.
Privacy.What do you mean "cannot be traced back to them", why would you not want the voted traced back to the voter?
Of course there would be privacy rules applied. That's easy. Simply disassociate the UUID (SSN) with the counted votes. Once the vote is tabulated and "applied" to a particular SSN, disassociate.Privacy.
I also object to being automatically counted among a pool of voters if that is the type of system you're describing.
I'm not such a savvy hacker. I have no objections to the existence of online voting so long as it is not designed to automatically include every citizen, but only those who sign up.Of course there would be privacy rules applied. That's easy. Simply disassociate the UUID (SSN) with the counted votes. Once the vote is tabulated and "applied" to a particular SSN, disassociate.
Sort of like how all online shopping works today. Your credit card information and user information are disassociated with each other. I wrote a platform for this when I was an IBMer. A big "orange" box store still uses the platform today.
If you voted for a politician, you have no right to complain about having one.Every time I see some bullshit protest on t.v. or wherever I always imagine myself grabbing the bullhorn and asking "How many of you voted?!"