ginwilly
Well-Known Member
so you are saying the gun bans in NYC are unconstitutional?
National Gun Owner's Insurance
- Thread starter canndo
- Start date
so you are saying the gun bans in NYC are unconstitutional?
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
you mean like this one?
1856: Dred Scott v. Sandford Upholds Individual Right The Second Amendment as an individual right was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States in its decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford in 1856. With the rights of slaves in question, the nation’s highest court opined on the intent of the Second Amendment for the first time, writing that affording slaves full rights of American citizenship would include the right “to keep and carry arms wherever they went.”
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
So let's review.
Bloomberg has the right to limit guns but not soda size according to the constitution.
Going after handguns is not necessary because everyone has one and it's a level playing field but Bloomberg was in his rights because then nobody would have one which is still a level playing field but we can't do it nationally because everyone has one.
We can restrict the rights of people based on what YOU feel they need, smokes pot.
There has been only a small fraction of high capacity mags used in murders but that's what you want to focus on because what what is used 98% of the time in gun deaths everybody has one (except in NYC, which is cool because you can't ban soda, gotta ban something for our own protection).
Acts as if the scotus is omniscient and is never wrong, but they have ruled that blacks can't be afforded the same rights as whites or they would be able to carry arms anywhere they went according to the 2nd, and corporations are people.
Will freely admit that only law abiding citizens will follow the law, but denies that the law only restricts law abiding citizens.
Edited to save fail: I have accurately represented Buck's position.
Bloomberg has the right to limit guns but not soda size according to the constitution.
Going after handguns is not necessary because everyone has one and it's a level playing field but Bloomberg was in his rights because then nobody would have one which is still a level playing field but we can't do it nationally because everyone has one.
We can restrict the rights of people based on what YOU feel they need, smokes pot.
There has been only a small fraction of high capacity mags used in murders but that's what you want to focus on because what what is used 98% of the time in gun deaths everybody has one (except in NYC, which is cool because you can't ban soda, gotta ban something for our own protection).
Acts as if the scotus is omniscient and is never wrong, but they have ruled that blacks can't be afforded the same rights as whites or they would be able to carry arms anywhere they went according to the 2nd, and corporations are people.
Will freely admit that only law abiding citizens will follow the law, but denies that the law only restricts law abiding citizens.
Edited to save fail: I have accurately represented Buck's position.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
Damnit!
I accurately represent your position. Now that part is there too.
Thanks man.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
mass murderers extend their thanks to you for making it so easy for them to acquire the tools needed to wipe out a classroom full of kindergarteners.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
mass murderers extend their thanks to you for making it so easy for them to acquire the tools needed to wipe out a classroom full of kindergarteners.
Because a mass murderer would never think to bring extra mags or guns. Or couldn't get one of the millions that already out there. Or couldn't find somebody making them illegally, because THIS is the law everyone will follow.
I'm going to go ahead and give you the last word on this. It's becoming circular again and we are boring the forum. Make it count.
Totally controvertible. Show me factual data that shows exactly how many extra people livewhen shooters have to reload. go ahead, you made the claim, now back it up.
Actually 75% of those murders are gang related inner city killings, 10% are justified homicide, while the last 15% (or about 1400 people) are actually "murdered". Which makes guns the number 2 object used to murder people, right after knives at 1800 a year.
Its like when buck says that statistics show that you are more likely to be harmed by a gun in your home than an intruder. Take out the suicides from the numbers and your more likely to be killed by lightning while riding on a dolphin in the Caspian sea.
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Yet we need the Voter Rights Act, because by the time the Supreme Court deems it unconstitutional, the black man was harmed. But all those other things you poo poo affect white people too. I think you're racist, bro.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Red1966
Well-Known Member
I saw some libtard "news" broadcast where they went on and on about the "dramatic" drop in gun related violence. They were very careful to say "gun related violence", but not once did they ever even hint that the amount of total violence barely declined, if at all. After about the tenth "gun related violence" quote, I began to become suspicious that they were cherry-picking statistics.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Rabbits are tasty any time of year. They're not seasonal like, say, produce.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
And yet they produce, seasonally. cn
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Yeah, like only 40 million without insurance. Gee.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Ginsberg isn't going to last 20 years. Hell, she looks like she won't last two years.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
You must spend a lot of time looking at peckers.
